Newt Gingrich - Our Votes Were Moved thru Barcelona and Counted in Frankfurt, Germany

OPINION Election Crimes: The Mountain of Evidence

Show more

The News Media REPEATEDLY DECLARED THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF ELECTION illegalities BEFORE ANY EVIDENCE was presented. In fact, they purposely created a psychological climate where any judge who doesn't have the courage of Columbus or Galileo (or Maria Bartiromo), would be afraid to draw any other conclusion than is being telecast to them by the news media.

Newt Gingrich Says Our Votes Traveled thru Barcelona and Were Counted in Frankfurt, Germany

Video – See former Speaker of the House Gingrich say this on the Sean Hannity Show here:
https://rumble.com/vc0cin-newt-gingrich-our-votes-were-moved-thru-barcelona-and-counted-in-frankfurt-.html

Three Star Lieutenant General McInerney (retired), reports that U.S. Special Forces have conducted a raid in Frankfurt, Germany, seizing computer servers from a “server farm” implicated in vote rigging in the 2020 election. General McInerney served as a military analyst on Fox News for 16 years.

Listen to an audio clip of General McInerney saying it here:

https://rumble.com/vbzo2p-general-mcinerney-in-his-own-words-about-the-special-forces-raid-in-frankfu.html

General McInerney says what happened to our election was conducted by a mixture of foreign actors and U.S. citizens; the act was treason and calls for drastic measures.

See the video of him saying it here:

https://rumble.com/vc0cwj-general-mcinerney-it-is-not-dirty-politics-or-tricks-it-is-treason.html

Page 2 of 24

An organization called the Blazing Press, characterized it this way:

"At this very minute, a covert war is raging across the globe, pitting Trump’s DoD and DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) against black hat deep state factions running the CIA.

"The good news is: President Trump is winning.

"As you know by now, the DoD launched a raid on a CIA-run server farm in Frankfurt, Germany, to secure servers that contain proof of CIA interference with the 2020 election (i.e. backdoor manipulations of election results via Dominion voting machines). But new information is now surfacing that indicates there was a firefight at the server farm facility, involving US Army Special Forces units, engaging with CIA-trained paramilitary units that were flown in from Afghanistan in an emergency effort to defend the facility.

"One CIA officer was killed during the firefight, and he is now being reported across the mainstream media as being “killed in Somalia.”

Five US Army soldiers were also killed, and they are being explained away as dying in a “helicopter crash” in Egypt.

"Despite the deaths, the servers were successfully acquired by the DoD, and those servers were turned over to President Trump’s private intelligence group, which is now once again led by Gen. Michael Flynn, recently pardoned and now allowed to process top secret information, since his security clearance has been restored. ...

"There were also server farm raids in Barcelona and Toronto, we are told."

The Detroit News (2016): Detroit's Voting Irregularities Spur State Audit

Please see the enclosed Detroit News article. In addition, below are some key excerpts from the article.

Page 3 of 24

"The recount problems were the worst in Detroit, where discrepancies meant officials couldn't recount votes in 392 of the city's 662 precincts.”

“"The Detroit News last week was first to report that more than half of Detroit would be ineligible for the recount because of the irregularities. The results were based on county reports obtained by The News.”

"Republican state senators last week called for an investigation in Wayne County, including one precinct where a Detroit ballot box contained only 50 of the 306 ballots listed in a poll book.”

Also, here is RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel (the former Michigan chair for the Republican party), speaking on the Sean Hannity show about what happened in the Detroit area in the 2020 election (for comparison to 2016).

https://youtu.be/2yOVSJ_xeT4

Wayne County (Detroit area) Canvasser Who Voted “No” to Certification – The statement from her press conference, where she said she was told she “Did not have the discretion to vote no,” she said she was lied to, bullied, her child threatened, and her signature may have been forged on the certification – she did not sign it.

Here is the link to video of her statement/press conference:

https://rumble.com/vbwce3-wayne-county-detroit-canvasser-press-conference.html

Antrim County Michigan: 6,000 votes cast for President Trump were suspiciously FLIPPED to JOE BIDEN by Dominion Machine.

President Trump won Antrim County by nearly 30% in 2016. So, poll workers were very suspicious when Joe Biden was initially found to have won their county by a substantial margin in 2020. So, they reportedly conducted their own hand recount, and discovered that 6,000 votes had mysteriously been flipped from President Trump to Joe Biden. (There were roughly 17,000 votes cast in Antrim County in total.)

Antrim County posted the following PRESS RELEASE (see hard copy enclosed):

Page 4 of 24

ANTRIM COUNTY, Mich. – “Working with Election Source, the voting software vendor, the Clerk’s Office has traced the cause of the original errors on the posted Unofficial election results. Late in the election preparation process, a minor correction was made to a ballot that caused compounding changes to how the software totals and presented the data [sic]. The skewed Unofficial results were a result of procedural misunderstanding that the Clerk’s Office had never before experienced.”

Is it possible the ANTRIM COUNTY, Michigan poll workers inadvertently stumbled across how a coded ballot may be used to flip votes from one candidate to another, as is reportedly a feature in Smartmatic’s manual? (In addition, manual instructions are reportedly provided for how to weight votes unequally, such as 0.75 for President Trump to 1.25 for Joe Biden.)
See below for more details.

BREAKING NEWS: Forensic Audit of Dominion Voting Machines in Antrim County Michigan Just Released

The audit was performed by Allied Security Operations Group which, according to the report, is staffed by professional from the following groups: "ASOG is a group of globally engaged professionals who come from various disciplines to include Department of Defense, Secret Service, Department of Homeland Security, and the Central Intelligence Agency."

ASOG "provides a range of security services, but has a particular emphasis on cybersecurity, open source investigation and penetration testing of networks."

Here are some highlights from the beginning of their report:

"PURPOSE AND PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS"

"1. The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election."

"2. We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully

Page 5 of 24

designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud."

Go here to see their full report:

https://www.scribd.com/document/488105156/Antrim-County-Forensics-Report-on-Dominion-Voting-System

ELECTION: Shocking NEW Evidence out of MICHIGAN

As I began sifting through video of the 11 hour election fraud hearing in ARIZONA, what I stumbled upon appears to be potentially the MOST Compelling, Persuasive EVIDENCE of Election Fraud to date. 289,866 ILLEGAL VOTES cast in the state of MICHIGAN, to be precise. Conclusive Proof. Irrefutable. (Or is it?)

How? And, from WHO?

The witness's name is Senator Richard Colbeck. He is a former two term state senator from the state of Michigan. He testified for about 20 minutes at the Arizona hearing on Monday.

Who is Senator Colbeck, and why does what he said matter? First of all, he served on the Michigan Elections and Government Reform Committee. In addition, he served as a "Poll Challenger" on the AV Counting Board in Detroit (AV stands for Absentee Vote) on election day from 5:00 pm until into the evening on the following day on November 4th. (He also trained poll challengers.) He is also a Microsoft certified small business specialist. And, he said he did "cabling design for the International Space Station." According to his bio at Ballotpedia, he has a B.S. and M.S. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan. He also studied at the International Space University in Strasbourg, France. He has worked in the aerospace, defense,

Page 6 of 24

pharmaceutical, healthcare, telecommunications, automotive, information technology and financial services fields.

(Michigan has the 4th ranked graduate Engineering program in the country according to U.S. News & World Report, just behind MIT, Stanford, and Cal Berkeley.)

He used statistical and graphical analysis. One graph he referred to is titled "The BIG SWITCH," which is enclosed. If you take a quick, close look at it, you will see exactly the point. To preface it, think of this example. Everyone is familiar with a typical ink jet printer. Each of them has a particular printing speed. One might print at a speed of 5 color ppm, or 5 pages per minute.

However, if someone came up to you, knowing that speed or print capacity, and told you they just printed 600 color pages a minute on that same printer, you would be incredulous. You wouldn't believe them because you know it is impossible. That printer can only print 5 color pages per minute. No way it could do 600.
Now, take a closer look at that slide titled The BIG SWITCH (enclosed). It shows a HUGE SPIKE in the number of votes counted during a two hour and thirty-eight minute period of time in FOUR COUNTIES in MICHIGAN (that include the City of Detroit). It shows that during that 2 hour and 38 minute period of time, 384,733 ballots were counted. However, that is impossible.

The problem is, the machines being used only had a CAPACITY to count 94,867 votes during that same period of time. Which means, 289,866 votes were created OUT OF THIN AIR! They had to be. That's like saying a printer that can only print 5 color pages per minute, suddenly had the capacity to print 600 pages per minute.

It is a PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Criminals are so stupid/arrogant. Hubris. That's how they get caught. There is always something they didn't think of. Something their hubris blinded them to. Plus, no one has ever checked before. They likely were complacent.

Page 7 of 24

Apparently, these machines keep track of everything they do. During that spike in votes (which was detected using a statistical technique called "Bedford's Law," which graphically revealed the HUGE spike in votes counted). Please see the enclosure labeled "Vote Tally Anomalies Identified" to view this spike graphically.

One other major discovery: See the enclosure labeled Non-Integer Reports. On that report you will see six lines of data, each timestamped a few minutes apart from 6:54 to 7:03. And, on each line you will see the number of votes.

Did you know that votes are counted in fractions of votes nowadays?(Facetiousness intended.)

Recall Sydney Powell's contention that the Dominion voting machines can be programmed to count votes in fractions, say 1.25 for each Biden vote to only 0.75 for each Trump vote.

Well, if you take a close look at the enclosure labeled Non-Integer Reports, you will see that the votes are counted with two digits past the decimal point. Like 1.23 or 5.67. However we only count votes 1,2,3,4,5 .... Not by fractions of votes. So where are these partial decimal votes coming from?

It has to be because the machine is not using whole numbers, they are using fractions of a vote.

Please see the enclosures. To see the full video of Senator Colbeck's testimony, please follow this link: https://youtu.be/vX34GiIGpyg

WISCONSIN RECOUNT: The TRUMP CAMPAIGN Identified 150,000 Unlawfully Case ballots

According to Kenosha, Wisconsin native, Reince Priebus, the Trump campaign has identified 150,000 unlawful ballots cast

Page 8 of 24

in Wisconsin, more than enough to recover the 21,000 votes needed to reclaim the lead and win the state. Priebus is also an attorney and the former RNC Chair when President Trump was elected in 2016.

Here's a portion of what he had to say on the Sean Hannity Show:

"The difference in Wisconsin compared to a lot of the other states you all are talking about is that this is a straight up question of state law. And the question is, 'Can clerks in the state of Wisconsin create their own system of early voting, which is not lawful in the state of Wisconsin?'

But, they created their own system of absentee ballot voting in person. And they said, 'Well, you can come in in-person and vote absentee, but we're just going to use this envelope as their application.' In Wisconsin, that's not allowable under the law. It's unequivocal.

"The application has to be filled out. And, the application, the law says, the application has to be stored with the municipal clerks and the envelopes have to be stored with the county. It's two different pieces of paper and it wasn't done.

"That's just one of the arguments. There's others, of course." Sean Hannity: "And, how many votes, Reince?" Priebus: "Over one hundred and fifty thousand."

Watch a video of the conversation here:
https://youtu.be/Vm4XNsLcL3I

OPINION FULTON COUNTY, GA: Wait Until You Get A LOAD of THIS!

Two Georgia women, from the overhead suitcase surveillance video, appear to be caught discretely passing a USB flash drive to one another, in a vote counting area, while looking around to see if anybody else is watching.

Note: Col. Waldron, in his testimony

Page 9 of 24

from the Arizona hearing (below), said a Dominion machine could be changed to flip votes from one candidate to another, delete votes, to unequally weight votes, using a simple thumb drive (or USB drive).

Please see the video here:
https://youtu.be/6Za3OKNKG-8

Remember the black-cloth-draped table and the “suitcases” purportedly full of ballots that were pulled out from under the table in Georgia after most were asked to leave (caught on overhead surveillance video)?

Get this: Two of those same women in that overhead surveillance video, after all of the others were asked to leave, were reportedly caught in a cell phone video, by an observer on election day, engaged in more suspicious behavior. Please see the attached photos for a primer of what I am talking about. Also, refresh your memory of the hidden ballot, suit case surveillance video here:

https://youtu.be/pwMi76cwEo0

Note: The woman in the overhead surveillance video with a larger, light colored Afro (for lack of a better term), and the one with the long blonde dreadlocks, are reportedly MOTHER-and-Daughter. And, the one with the blonde dreadlocks (the daughter) is reportedly the Supervisor for Voter Registration.

See: https://youtu.be/6Za3OKNKG-8

A Stack of Counterfeit Ballots - Found by a 20 yr Veteran Poll Manager in Georgia

Previously, footage of this woman's testimony was aired on cable news, but the meat of her testimony, the most important parts, were left out.

Page 10 of 24

Watch the riveting testimony of this experienced, 20 year, vote-counting veteran before a Georgia State Senate Committee here (or read the transcript of her testimony below):

https://youtu.be/u7ykoszTx_Q?t=80

(It starts at the 1:20 mark.)

Keep in mind (as you watch the video), there are claims (and purported videos of) ballots being prematurely shredded outside of a vote counting facility in Cobb County, Georgia. And, attorney Sidney Powell also claims to have a HUGE bag of those prematurely shredded ballots in her office

(NOTE: Where there is one stack of counterfeit ballots, there are likely hundreds or thousands more. Where there is smoke, there is usually fire. I doubt whoever did it, would risk going to prison, just to counterfeit or forge one stack of 100 ballots. Plus, what would be the point? One stack of 100 ballots would hardly make a difference. There are likely thousands more that slipped by, undetected.)

Video Transcript:

Reporter: "A polling manager in Fulton County, Georgia told state legislators, that while she was counting ballots, she came across a batch that were 'pristine.' None had been folded, and all appeared to be exactly the same. She says they could have been scanned copies."

Reporter: "Susan Boyle has worked as a poll manager for over 20 years. She told the Georgia Senate Committee, during a hearing Thursday, about an odd batch of absentee ballots that caught her attention during the Georgia recount."

Susan Boyle: "Most of them are pretty worn. Until we came up to a batch, that is, um, my words were 'pristine.' It was white. It was So white. And, this is a typical absentee ballot."

(She holds one up. it is folded in several places.)

Susan Boyle: "You can see how, when it comes to you in the mail, how it’s got many folds in it."

Susan Boyle: "These had no folds." (She is referring to the batch of counterfeits.)

Reporter: "Boyle said what first struck her about these ballots was the feel of the paper. She said when you have counted and held ballots for as long as she has, you know the feel of them - and compared it to the feel of a fake versus a genuine dollar bill."

Boyle: "But the thing that REALLY Jumped out at us, besides the feel of these ballots, besides there were no folds, was the fact that the first one that was bubbled in" (referring to the Presidential vote) "had almost a little eclipse of white in the bubble, where you would bubble in."

Editor’s NOTE: See Col. Waldron’s testimony below, where he mentions that forensics can be done on suspected forged or counterfeit ballots, on the paper and the ink, to be compared to authentic ballots. Also, he said they have affidavits from witnesses in

Page 11 of 24

Pennsylvania, who said the Democrats had semi trailers staged all over the country to deliver more “ballots” wherever “needed.”

Reporter: "She noticed that the markings on the ballots all looked exactly the same, with the white eclipse around the filled in marking. Boyle had also written a sworn affidavit that 98% of the batch in question were for joe Biden."

(Editor’s NOTE: That's the exact same ratio of votes counted after everyone was kicked out of that precinct in Fulton County, where, what looked like suitcases of ballots were rolled out from under a black-cloth-draped table, and caught on overhead surveillance video.)

Boyle: "What we began to notice was an overwhelming amount were exactly, not possibly, but exactly the same."

Reporter: "And, in the middle of the stack, Boyle said they found a single ballot that appeared to have been pulled from a printer or a copier too soon., because the image wasn't aligned properly on the paper. A state lawmaker questioned Boyle on whether the pristine nature of the ballots could be explained by the duplication process?"

Lawmaker: "Couldn't that be explained by the fact that they were all personally replicated and duplicated with observation by individuals working that same poll?"

Boyle: "Well, the probability of that, I would think, is very slight because, why would 98 ballots have that little white eclipse on the very first Presidential, um ballot?" (She was searching for the right word, she meant the first oval filled in on the Presidential selection.)

Boyle: "Why would ALL OF THEM look Exactly the same? It was very easy to see that A (single) BALLOT had been Replicated MANY times."

Reporter: "She said it looked like the rest of the ballots were copies that had been marked by a printer or scanner, which could explain why the markings weren't properly aligned - leaving the white eclipse inside the bubble."

GEORGIA: Cell Phone Video of MILITARY BALLOTS Being Pulled out of a Dumpster

Watch this video of a group gathered around a dumpster pulling Military ballots out of a dumpster, with one girl actually standing in the

Page 12 of 24

dumpster with, what appears to be, a large bag of ballots in her hands.

https://rumble.com/vaympt-georgia-election-fraud.html

Senator Rand Paul – Senate Hearing on Election Results

“The courts have NOT decided the facts. The courts NEVER looked at the facts. … The fraud happened. The election in many ways, was stolen.” – Rand Paul

Senator Paul: “Ken Starr, it’s been alleged that 60 courts have refused to hear these cases, therefore there was no fraud in the election. Um, I guess another way of looking at this is that the court cases have been refused for procedural and technical reasons. When you see the 60 court cases rejected, do you think that the conclusion by our court system, that there is no fraud? Or, do you think that the court cases were primarily rejected for procedural reasons?

Ken Starr: “Right, Senator Paul, it is my understanding that the vast majority of these cases were rejected [as you] rightly stated, procedural reasons – as opposed to a merits based or substantive based evaluations [sic].

Ken Starr: “And, of course, we saw that very recently, and I think most dramatically, by the Supreme Court’s unanimous rejection of the Bill of Complaint filed by the Texas Attorney General, my home state here. And, the entirety of the decision was based upon the legal concept of standing. You just don’t, Texas, have standing to object to what happened in Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, or whatever. And, that is a reasonable ruling. There are those who would quarrel with it, in that we are a United States of America. And, if something bad happens in one state, then it ends up having an effect in another state. …

"The argument is quite reasonable, and I think others think it’s quite reasonable, that at least the matter should have been heard.

Senator Paul: “Yeah, and I think it’s important, though, that we look at this and understand What courts are saying and not saying. The courts have not said there wasn’t fraud. The courts simply did not rule on, or hear from the fraud. […]

Page 13 of 24

Senator Paul: “There is another important aspect to this, though, that is a legal aspect, that I think does need to be heard by the courts. And, I don’t know if it can be heard beyond the election. But, I think it should. This is the question of whether or not people who are non-legislators can change the election law. And, this happened in many, many states. Probably two dozen states decided to accept ballots after the election. Two dozen states decided they could mail out applications or mail-out ballots. All without the will of the legislature. Do you think there is any hope for any of this being heard,

Judge Starr, outside of the concept of changing the election, is there any possibility any court is ever going to hear this and say that it was wrong that Secretaries of State changed the law in the middle of this pandemic without the approval of the legislature? […]

Senator Paul: “I think the legal question there is a very easy one to decide. I think even as a physician I can figure out that the Secretary of State cannot create law. …We can’t just say it didn’t happen. We can’t just say, “Oh, 4,000 people voted in Nevada that were non-citizens,” and we are just going to ignore it? We are going to sweep it under the rug and say, “Oh the courts have decided the facts?” The courts have NOT decided the facts. The courts NEVER looked at the facts. The courts don’t like elections. They stayed out of it by finding an excuse. … But, the fraud happened. The election in many ways, was stolen. …And, the only last comment I would say, What Mr. Krebs, he can speak for himself. But, I think his job was keeping the foreigners out of the election. And, “it was the most secure election” based on the security of the Internet, and technology. But he never has voiced an opinion, … on whether or not dead people voted. I don’t think he examined that. Did he examine non-citizens voting? So to say it was the safest election, sure, I agree with your statement, if you’re referring to foreign intervention. But, if you’re saying it’s the safest election, based on no dead people voted, non non-citizens voted, no people broke the absentee rules, I think that’s false. And, I think that’d what upset a lot of people on our side, is that they’re taking your statement to mean, Oh, there was no problem in the election. I don’t think you’ve examined any of the problems that we’ve heard here. So really, you’re just referring to something differently, is the way I look at it. Thank you Mr. Chairman.”

To see the rest of Senator Paul’s performance at the Senate Hearing on Election Results, please follow this link:

https://youtu.be/hDMPmNbhCQA

Page 14 of 24

See similar statements by Senators Lankford and Hawley here:

https://youtu.be/EXminByXWq4

And here: https://youtu.be/8i2zVEiD4Wk

GEORGIA: Staggering List of Illegal Votes Alleged by Witness at State Senate Hearing

Keep in mind, Joe Biden is alleged to have won Georgia by only 11,779 votes.

See the video: https://rumble.com/vc1uut-georgia-staggering-list-of-illegal-votes-alleged-by-witness-at-state-senate.html Witness
:
• 2,506 felons voted illegally in Georgia.
• 66,248 underage, and therefore, ineligible people to illegally register to vote before their 17th birthday, when the law requires seventeen and a half years old.
• At least 2,432 individuals to vote who were not listed as registered.
• 1,043 individuals to cast ballots who had illegally registered to vote using a post office box.
• 4,926 individuals voted in Georgia who had registered to vote after their Georgia registration date, thereby canceling their Georgia registration.
• 10,315 or more individuals to vote who were deceased by the time of the election.
• 395 individuals to vote in Georgia who had cast ballots in another state, which is illegal in BOTH states.
• 15,700 individuals to vote in Georgia who had filed national change of address with the United States postal service, prior to November 3rd, 2020.
• 40,279 individuals to vote who had moved across county lines at least thirty days prior to Election Day and who had failed to properly reregister to vote in their new county after moving, also in violation of Georgia law.

Page 15 of 24

Sidney Powell: The Supreme Court has Agreed to Hear TWO of Her Cases (Michigan and Georgia)

@SidneyPowell1 ·
Dec 17 The #SupremeCourt electronic filing system shows our EMERGENCY Petitions docketed for #Georgia & #Michigan but SLOW-walking w/ state response not due until JAN 14!

https://twitter.com/SidneyPowell1/status/1339670820629729280/photo/1

Listen to Sidney Powell’s interview with Mark Steyn who sat in for Rush Limbaugh (Rush Limbaugh announced many months ago that his weekly radio audience had increased to 50 MILLION unique listeners):

https://youtu.be/J9ecsRDfP1U

Sidney Powell on Maria Bartiromo's Show on Fox News: https://youtu.be/55z0atWG9oE

Sidney Powell on Lou Dobbs Show on Fox News - Part 1: https://youtu.be/3DeF_t6OQLA

Lou Dobbs with Trump Lawyer Sydney Powell – Part 2: https://youtu.be/glwr94gnMqk

https://youtu.be/ivaoC7NCFec

Justice Alito's Said the PA. Supreme Court's Election Law Ruling is Likely Unconstitutional (See below)

Justice Samuel Alito: "That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."

Page 16 of 24

Reuters (Dec. 21, 2020): “In a statement issued by the campaign, Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani said the campaign had filed a petition asking the high court to reverse three rulings by a Pennsylvania state court interpreting the state's rules for mail-in ballots.

“The Campaign’s petition seeks to reverse three decisions which eviscerated the Pennsylvania Legislature’s protections against mail ballot fraud," Giuliani said in a statement. Giuliani said the filing sought all "appropriate remedies," including an order allowing Pennsylvania's Republican-controlled legislature to award the state's 20 electoral votes to Trump. Biden won the state by more than 80,000 votes.

"The petition is "frivolous" and is not going to stop Biden from becoming president on Jan. 20, said Joshua Douglas, an election law professor at the University of Kentucky."

The Professor apparently hasn't seen Justice Alito's statement (joined by Justices Gorsuch and Thomas) about the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Ruling regarding Election Law.

OPINION Supreme Ct: Don't be confused - there are TWO Pennsylvania Cases The Supreme Court case just dismissed (The Kelly case) has nothing to do with the other. The other case, REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA is about ballots turned in after the 8:00 pm election day deadline, required by statute in Pennsylvania. In the Kelly case, they're asking the Supreme Court to strike down a law PASSED by the Pennsylvania legislature (2019 Act 77) because, they allege, it violates the Pennsylvania constitution.

The Kelly case was doomed from its inception. The Kelly case is the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Rudy Giuliani has been arguing all over the country, while speaking before the various state legislatures. Giuliani has been telling state legislatures, that Under Article II, section 1,

Page 17 of 24

clause 2, state legislatures have PLENARY power when it comes to choosing electors for their respective states. What is Plenary Power? Plenary power is defined as "A plenary power or plenary authority is a complete and absolute power to take action on a particular issue, with no limitations. It is derived from the Latin term plenus ("full")." In tossing the Kelly case, the Court is, essentially, agreeing with Giuliani. The Kelly case incorrectly argued that the PA legislature's plenary power is subordinate to the Pennsylvania Constitution. However, the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution means that when any state law, constitution, etc. conflicts with the United States Constitution, the U.S. Constitution reigns supreme. It trumps any state law (or state Constitution) to the contrary. For example, suppose a state amended its constitution to prohibit freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Could they get away with that?

No, of course not. The U.S Constitution reigns supreme. The Bill of Rights, if you will, trumps a state constitution that contradicts it. That's the flaw in the Kelly case.

The state legislatures, under Article II, section 1, cause 2 provides "Each State SHALL appoint, IN SUCH MANNER as the LEGISLATURE THEREOF MAY DIRECT, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress".

The Kelly case, in effect, is ass-backwards. They claimed the Supreme Court should overrule 2019 Act 77, passed, on October 31, 2019, by the Pennsylvania state legislature, because they claimed it violated the Pennsylvania state Constitution. However, the Kelly case was a no-brainer. it was an quick and easy toss by a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court (for the same reasons that Rudy Giuliani is arguing that the various swing states in question, violated the plenary power granted to the various state legislatures, when election officials and the various secretary of states, made up their own rules, in effect, overriding the plenary power granted to their legislatures by the U.S. Constitution - to Direct the Manner in which the electors are chosen by their respective states.

The hearts of the petitioner's attorneys in the Kelly case were in the right place. They just made the wrong legal argument.

Page 18 of 24

Ordinarily, the Kelly case might have been a pretty good argument. However, not, in this case, when a specific U.S. Constitutional provision (Article II, section 1, clause 2) overrides it, or as Rudy Giuliani characterized it, the state legislators have PLENARY power:

"Each State shall appoint, IN SUCH MANNER as the LEGISLATURE THEREOF MAY DIRECT, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress".

That's where the REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA case is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the Kelly case. (Giuliani and the Texas AG case, joined by 17 other state attorney's general, essentially agree with Justice Alito's statement, below.)

In the 2019 Act 77 passed by the Pennsylvania Legislature, it specifically amended Pennsylvania law to say this (requiring all absentee and mail-in ballots be received BY 8:00 p.m. on ELECTION DAY): "An absentee ballot cast by any absentee elector as defined in section 1301(i), (j), (k), (l), (m) and (n), an absentee ballot under section 1302(a.3) or a mail-in ballot cast by a mail-in elector SHALL BE canvassed in accordance with this subsection IF the ABSENTE BALLOT or MAIL-IN ballot is RECEIVED in the office of the county board of elections NO LATER THAN eight o'clock p.m. ON THE DAY of THE primary or ELECTION." (emphasis added)

On October 28th, 2020, Justice Alito issued the following statement (also attached): Statement of ALITO, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL. ON MOTION TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
No. 20–542. Decided [October 28, 2020]

Page 19 of 24

He was joined in his statement by JUSTICE THOMAS and JUSTICE GORSUCH. Here are the key highlights (see also, the text of the official statement, enclosed.)

"The motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE BARRETT took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. Additional opinions may follow."

"The Court’s handling of the important constitutional issue raised by this matter has needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious post-election problems." (He got that right! :)

"The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has issued a decree that squarely alters an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature pursuant to its authority under the Constitution of the United States to make rules governing the conduct of elections for federal office. See Art. I, §4, cl. 1; Art. II, §1, cl. 2; Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76 (2000) (per curiam)."

"In a law called Act 77, the legislature permitted all voters to cast their ballots by mail but UNAMBIGUOUSLY REQUIRED that all mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on election day." (emphasis added)

"It also specified that if this provision was declared invalid, much of the rest of Act 77, including its liberalization of mail-in voting, would be void."

"The legislature subsequently made it clear that, in its judgment, the COVID–19 pandemic did not call for any change in the election-day deadline."

"In a law enacted in March 2020, the legislature addressed election related issues caused by the pandemic, but it chose not to amend the deadline for the receipt of mailed ballots."

"In the face of Act 77’s deadline, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by a vote of four to three, decreed that mailed ballots need not be received by election day."

Page 20 of 24

"Instead, it imposed a different rule: Ballots are to be treated as timely if they are postmarked on or before election day and are received within three days thereafter."

"In addition, the court ordered that a ballot with no postmark or an illegible postmark must be regarded as timely if it is received by that same date."

"The court expressly acknowledged that the statutory provision mandating receipt by election day was unambiguous and that its abrogation of that rule was not based on an interpretation of the statute."

"It further conceded that the statutory deadline was constitutional on its face, but it claimed broad power to do what it thought was needed to respond to a “natural disaster,” and it justified its decree as necessary to protect voters’ rights under the Free and Equal Elections Clause of the State Constitution."

"A month ago, the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and the Pennsylvania Senate leaders asked this Court to stay the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision pending the filing and disposition of a petition for certiorari."

"They argued that the state court decision violated the previously cited constitutional provisions, as well as the federal statute setting a uniform date for federal elections."

"Respondent, Democratic Party of Pennsylvania (DPP), agreed that the constitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision was a matter of national importance and urged us to grant review and to decide the issue before the election."

"Instead of doing what either party sought, the Court simply denied the stay."

"Although there were four votes to enter a stay, the application failed by an equally divided vote."

"Now, in a last ditch attempt to prevent the election in Pennsylvania from being conducted under a cloud, we have been asked to grant a petition for a writ of certiorari, to expedite review, and to decide the constitutional question prior to the election."

Page 21 of 24

"It would be highly desirable to issue a ruling on the constitutionality of the State Supreme Court’s decision before the election."

"That question has national importance, and there is a strong likelihood that the State Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution."

"The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election."

"For these reasons, the question presented by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision calls out for review by this Court—as both the State Republican and Democratic Parties agreed when the former applied for a stay."

"But I reluctantly conclude that there is simply not enough time at this late date to decide the question before the election."

"That does not mean, however, that the state court decision must escape our review."

"Although the Court denies the motion to expedite, the petition for certiorari remains before us, and if it is granted, the case can then be decided under a shortened schedule."

"In addition, the Court’s denial of the motion to expedite is not a denial of a request for this Court to order that ballots received after election day be segregated so that if the State Supreme Court’s decision is ultimately overturned, a targeted remedy will be available."

"Petitioner represents that it will apply to this Court to obtain that modest relief, ...

"Although the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected Petitioner’s request for that relief, we have been informed by the Pennsylvania Attorney General that the Secretary of the Commonwealth issued guidance today directing county boards of elections to segregate ballots received between 8:00 p.m. on November 3, 2020, and 5:00 p.m. on November 6,

Page 22 of 24

2020. Nothing in the Court’s order today precludes Petitioner from applying to this Court for relief if, for some reason, it is not satisfied with the Secretary’s guidance."

Please Justice Alito’s statement, attached/enclosed.

See: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-542_i3dj.pdf

And: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/legis/li/uconsCheck.cfm?yr=2019&sessInd=0&act=77

See also: NEWSWEEK Supreme Court Intervenes in Pennsylvania Vote Count as Alito Orders Late Ballots Separated

https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-intervenes-pennsylvania-vote-count-alito-orders-late-ballots-separated-1545684

https://www.aol.com/news/trump-campaign-again-ask-u-211900159-131713084.html

NOTE: If the courts were to say, Well, it is too late. The voters have relied on the unlawful misinformation put out by election officials.

The problem with that notion is that would be true every time they unlawfully (and unconstitutionally) amended the voting/election regulations. Thereby, rendering ALL election laws obsolete. The election officials announce illegal changes to their legislature’s voting regulations right before an election. The voters rely on them. The courts say too late. No election laws would ever need to be adhered to. There must be a penalty to dissuade election officials from making up their own election laws in violation of the United States Constitution, which grants that power solely to the respective state legislatures. Otherwise, this cycle will perpetually repeat itself.

Senator Lankford – Senate Hearing on Election Results

"In December, 2016, there was a poll that was done on if the American people believed that the Russians interfered and changed our election. At that time, 32% of the people believed that the Russians had influenced the outcome of the election, in December of 2016. …

Page 23 of 24

"A few days ago, another poll asked the question, Do you believe there was election and voter fraud in the presidential election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump? This December, 46% of the voters in America have said YES. 45% saying No. Interestingly enough, Trump voters saying there was fraud, 80%. Biden voters also said 16%, that they believe there was voter fraud. … In 2016, the question was, Is there a potential for a problem? The answer was YES, there is a potential, and we ought to fix that. Now, amazingly, after this election, all kinds of issues have come up and said there are potentials for problems, and everyone seems to be saying, “MOVE ON.” The only reason I can think that would be different, was because the election outcome seemed to be different. And, one side is now saying, let’s just move on and ignore this. In my state on election night, like 27 other states in the country, by that evening, we were counting votes and all absentee ballots had been received. There was much less opportunity for accusations of fraud because all of our ballots were in.

Amazingly enough, a week after the election was completed, this November, Oklahomans were listening to other states, that were saying things like, “We don’t know how many more ballots there are left to count.” …

"The obvious answer is, if you mail a ballot to everyone in the state, even if they didn’t ask for it, does it provide an opportunity for fraud? Especially when the state did not first purge or verify those addresses? And, they sent THOUSANDS of ballots to people that no longer lived there. I’ve talked to Nevada residents that received MULTIPLE BALLOTS at their home, for people that no longer lived there. That’s a problem. And, we should at least admit that’s a problem. And, for some reason the other side was very focused on, We’ve gotta fix the potential for problem from 2016, but in 2020, when there’s potential for problem, and things that have been shown, everyone seems to say, move along. Let’s not discuss this. …

"Mr. Binnall, 42,000 people in Nevada, voted more than once according to your work in this. 42,000 people. 1,500 people voted in Nevada that were dead. 19,000 people voted though they did not live in Nevada, and they weren’t a college student. 8,000 people voted from a non-existent address. 15,000 people voted, though they were registered to a commercial address or vacant address. And, 4,000 people voted in Nevada that are non-citizens.

Page 24 of 24

"My question to you is, in my state, when someone votes twice, and we do have that occasionally, about 50 times a year, that actually occurs in our state. We prosecute individuals that vote twice. In these one hundred and thirty thousand instances that you have identified, from the 2020 election in Nevada, Do you know of ANY prosecutions currently going on in Nevada? For any voter fraud? …

"Mr. Chairman could I ask for one additional moment? Judge Starr, you’ve raised twice, this issue about Pennsylvania, and that the laws in Pennsylvania were changed. In Oklahoma, we did state bill 210, and state bill 1779, because we saw with the pandemic, there were going to be problems. So, our legislature came into session, made a change to be able to adjust for how we were going to do early ballots, and early voting. Because we knew that was the law that needed to be followed. Was that done in Pennsylvania? And, does it matter who sets the law and the rules for elections?

Kenneth Starr: “No, it was not done, unfortunately, in Pennsylvania. The Governor sought to change the law. The General Assembly in Pennsylvania had met, reviewed and made various and sundry changes and reforms. And then, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, building on what the Governor had done, made additional changes. And, those, in my judgment, were complete violations of the United States Constitution, and flagged as such, preliminarily, by Justice Samuel Alito.

See: https://youtu.be/EXminByXWq4

See: Senator Josh Hawley – 74 MILLION Americans are NOT “Going to SHUT UP”

https://youtu.be/8i2zVEiD4Wk

Show less