Hillary's Emails Explained In 10 Minutes

Published November 10, 2020 2,446 Views

Rumble Originally published on Jul 9, 2019
In Hillary's Emails Explained In 10 Minutes I take 10 minutes to explain Hillary Clinton's emails. Hillary Clinton's emails were hacked by China and the FBI ignored the evidence. In this video the evidence is not ignored. This is a clip from Spygate The Movie. #hillaryemail #spygate You can support me at
https://www.subscribestar.com/RightLeftOfCenter
https://www.paypal.me/rightleftofcenter

The Hillary Clinton email scandal began when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton intentionally violated the Federal Records Act, and destroyed government property belonging to the National Archives and the American people.

Barack Obama knew of the illegal server and was at risk. Obama communicated with Hillary Clinton on the unsecure server, including from the territory of Russia where it likely was hacked, according to the FBI. Hillary had effectively compromised the President himself as her own "insurance policy" against prosecution, and to hide her pay-to-play schemes.

The Obama Department of Justice under Loretta Lynch and FBI under James Comey scuttled the investigation. Clinton was supposedly "exonerated" by Comey in an extraordinarily weird public press conference that violated DOJ regulations, processes, and chain of command. Comey's "absolution" a few weeks before the 2016 Democratic Convention gave the appearance of clearing her way for nomination as the Democratic party presidential candidate. America is not a police state, and the police neither determine guilt or innocence nor make the decision to prosecute based on investigatory evidence. Yet Democrat progressives believed the American people gullible enough to accept naked malfeasance and mis-administration of justice.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), Charles McCullough III - an Obama Appointee in 2011, found that virtually all of Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a “foreign entity.” According to McCullough, his attempts to bring this information to a higher level were met with threats to his job and family.[6] Vice Chairman of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations Rep. Louie Gohmert, in sworn statements at a July 12 House Committee on the Judiciary hearing, Gohmert did not reveal the entity’s identity, but said it was unrelated to Russia.[7]

The Boston Herald reported a Chinese-owned company operating in Washington, D.C., hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and obtained nearly all her emails. The Chinese firm obtained Clinton’s emails in real time as she sent and received communications and documents through her personal server, according to the sources, who said the hacking was conducted as part of a state sponsored intelligence operation. The Chinese wrote code that was planted in the server kept in Clinton’s residence in upstate New York. The code generated an instant “courtesy copy” for nearly all of her emails and forwarded those copies to the Chinese company.[8]

Echoing the ICIG report and Rep Gohmert, President Trump has accused China of hacking Clinton's emails as well.

The FBI has claimed they have no evidence of Chinese hacking. However, this claim pertains only to the FBI itself versus the intelligence community at large. If the intelligence had been developed by another agency - the NSA or CIA, for example, the information would have been compartmentalized and, therefore, would not have been passed along.
FBI director James Comey decided well in advance, before the investigation was complete but after he determined Sec. Clinton had committed felonies, not to recommend prosecution. His recommendation came on the heals of President Obama's high-profile intervention in the case. Comey perjured himself on numerous occasions about what, when, and why he made the recommendation not to prosecute Clinton.

Comey and Strzok conspired together to obstruct justice. Strzok suggested reducing Comey's finding of felonious gross negligence against Hillary Clinton with the obsequious characterization of extremely careless. On July 5, 2016 Comey echoed Obama's words that Sec. Clinton and staff were “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information," and "there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information…There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about the matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation."