VULNERABILITY TO VOTE THEFT BUILT INTO DOMINION MACHINES

3 years ago
3.21K

Mr. Hursti has spent the past 15 years trying to draw attention to the weaknesses in America’s voting systems. Last month, he was featured in an HBO documentary called “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections,” about far-reaching security breaches that he says have gone unfixed. He warns that both the American political establishment and the public are far too complacent. “Once you understand how everything works, you understand how fragile everything is and how easy it is to lose this all,” Mr. Hursti says in the film.

In 2005, a concerned Florida election supervisor Hursti to hack into one of the state’s commonly used voting machines to test its vulnerability. The verdict wasn’t reassuring. By modifying just a few lines of code on the machine’s memory card, Mr. Hursti says, he could change the results of a mock election. That same model, he adds, will be among those used in the 2020 elections.

Diebold, the manufacturer of the voting machines which Hursti so easily hacked, also went after Ion Sancho, the courageous Election Supervisor who had allowed us to hack his county’s Diebold system in Florida. Mr Sancho was perilously close to losing his job.

Then California’s Secretary of State commissioned the top computer scientists at UC Berkeley to investigate our vote rigging hack, which was exposed by our hacker, Harri Hursti. The special report from UC Berkeley states: “Mr. Hursti’s attack on the AV-OS is definitely real. He was indeed able to change the election results by doing nothing more than modifying the contents of a memory card.”

In 2009, Diebold sold its voting machine business to Dominion Voting, which services 28 states, including most battleground swing states, and provides essentially the same machines which were used in 2005.

(A spokesperson for Dominion Voting, says that these weaknesses were fixed in 2012, but Mr. Hursti says that he has tested the new version and found the updates insufficient. The Recent ‘glitch’ of 6,000 votes mysteriously appearing for Biden in one county alone, says otherwise.

We note that on Election Day in Detroit in 2016, more than 80 voting machines malfunctioned. An audit later allegedly revealed there was no evidence of fraud, .

Hursti showed that in the very same Dominion Voting machines, any one inserting what appears as a standard memory card to convey data out of the voting machine, could, at the same time, by introducing a script determining how many votes would be stolen from Trump to Biden and doing so seamlessly so only a hand recount could reveal fraud

When vote theft is done by the techniques readily available in Dominion machines used in 28 states, including all the battleground states, the data is seamlessly integrated into tabulations so that only a ballot hand count can reveal it.

Here we have a situation where Dominion machines, wide open to vote shift are in play in all the battleground states. So the Supreme Court will have to eventually rule for recounts based on the same defect being present in other states…and having been exploited by election officials aiming to steal the election

Hursti shows how easy it is to morph the apparent vote by any data collection from the machine so that it yields totals completely different from those which would arise from ballots being scanned into it.

These Dominion machines were the same ones used in 2005 when the hack was first done, with Diebold, the company which produced those machines being sold to Dominion in 2009.

Any one of many more sophisticated ‘hacks’ could have achieved a similar distortion of the vote in the same machines. Even such a simple action as the collection of the data from a voting machine, would and could instruct it to shift the count seamlessly from Trump to Biden.

It may be that the Michigan officials needed extra time, as did PA, to generate hand ballots to go with the 1000s of fake votes introduced into machines...They found themselves generating votes before they had the ballots in hand. It may well be that they were waiting to get more ballots to then hand forge in order to match up in any future recount .

It seems that the massive Trump turnout drew the corrupt democrat electoral officials…(only one per county is needed in order to alter all the machines)..into a comedy of errors at the last minute.

It appears that they ran out of ballots needed to ‘fudge the vote”..and delays in ‘counting” were not ‘for counting’ but to arrange for the arrival of ballots to eventually match up with the totals needed to prevent their states to be called for Trump.

Did the two vans and the Ferrari which brought 130,000 ballots to Cobo Arena at 4AM have to go to a printer or some storage facility to obtain more blanks…and then did they have to actually fill them in-- in order to roughly match the fraudulent totals that their machines were producing at 5AM….so that the state would not be called for Trump

Loading comments...