Federal judge rules signatures on absentee ballots don't need to match records in South Carolina
3 years ago
14.7K
Voters will now be given the opportunity to correct their signatures, if an election board official finds an issue
Open configuration options
Loading 7 comments...
-
1:02
Just the News
1 hour agoDavid Bernhardt: Biden administration has ‘taken a sledgehammer’ to productive energy policies
9633 -
0:33
Newsy
3 years agoJudge: North Carolina Absentee Ballots Must Have Witness Signatures
758 -
0:40
Just the News
3 years agoFederal judge rules Wisconsin can count absentee ballots six days after election
43.1K17 -
0:29
Newsy
3 years agoJudge: South Carolina Can't Reject Ballots For Signature Mismatches
7241 -
0:27
Newsy
3 years agoHigh Court Rules Witness Signature Required On South Carolina Ballots
1.18K -
0:36
Newsy
3 years agoCourt Rules North Carolina Can Continue Counting Absentee Ballots
824 -
2:19
WTMJMilwaukee
3 years agoFederal judge extends deadline for Wisconsin ballots
7713 -
1:40
WTMJMilwaukee
3 years agoFederal judge extends deadline for Wisconsin ballots
2671 -
1:48
WEWS
3 years agoFederal judge rules CLE water lawsuit alleging discrimination can go forward
8 -
0:34
Newsy
3 years agoAlaska Voters Don't Need A Witness Signature On Absentee Ballots
699