I replied to the retards

Support me ♥ https://www.patreon.com/leaflit
Watch me ♥ https://www.twitch.tv/Leaflit
Kick me ♥ https://www.kick.com/Leaflit
Follow me ♥ https://twitter.com/Leaflit
See me ♥ https://www.tiktok.com/@leaflitvt
Discord ♥ https://discord.com/invite/leaflit
TTRPG ♥ https://rpg.angelssword.com/
MERCH ♥ https://shop.angelssword.com/

Hey everyone — it’s Leaflit here. I’ve been seeing a lot of reaction on Twitter since my debate with NyaraVT. Some folks — especially from Nyara’s side — have called me a “N*zi,” a “f*scist,” and accused me of supporting segregation or hate simply because I argued for freedom of association and the right to choose who you associate with.

I want to set the record straight. This video is my response to those accusations. Here’s what I actually meant — and why I think many of the people attacking me are doing so deliberately, or because they misunderstand (or misrepresent) what I said.

What I actually stand for:

I believe in the right of individuals/groups to associate (or not associate) voluntarily — that means if a community wants to preserve its own space or identity, that’s their choice. I’m not calling for forced separation, persecution, or hate.

I’m defending liberty, freedom of association, and freedom of belief/values, not bigotry. I don’t believe in race-based supremacy, I don’t support violence or hate — I support the right of people to choose their social circles, cultural spaces, or political groups.

I’m not opposed to all interaction or mixing — I respect peaceful coexistence, cooperation, and mutual consent. What I oppose is forced integration or social pressure that erases difference under the guise of “diversity.”

Why the backlash stinks — and what’s really going on:

Social media “cancel culture” is real. People are quick to label any dissenting opinion as “hate,” “N*zi,” or “f*scist,” often without even reading what was said — just because they disagree.

This trend often uses labels and mob-shaming instead of actual arguments. Name-calling and false equivalences are becoming the default when someone challenges widely accepted narratives.

As a result, honest debates — about culture, identity, values, or association — get shut down before they even begin. Opinions get reduced to “hate vs anti-hate,” instead of nuanced discussion.

If you hear someone accuse another person of being a “N*zi” or “f*scist” just because they talk about preserving cultural identity or freedom of association — ask for what was actually said. Demand quotes. Demand context. Don’t let social-media mobs decide truth.

I’m not afraid of debate. I’m open to honest discussion, disagreement, critique. But I won’t accept slander for holding values I believe in.

If you believe in free speech, free association, and honest conversation — please like, subscribe, and hit the bell. And let me know: Have you ever seen someone get cancelled online for expressing unpopular beliefs? How do you think we should handle mis-labels and mob mentality?

freedom of association debate, cancel culture reaction, social media mob accusations, defending free speech YouTube, hate-accusations unjustified, cultural identity discussion, online backlash fake labels, Leaflit responds to cancel, online debate ideology, freedom association vs segregation, cancel culture, freedom of association, social media backlash, online cancel mob, defending free speech, hate-accusations false, cultural identity debate, free association vs segregation, online debate reaction, Leaflit commentary, cancel culture analysis, political labeling online, identity vs ideology, speech fairness, reaction to Twitter hate, Leaflit defends free association, social media cancel backlash, online mobs calling people N*zis reaction, culture debate freedom of association, identity politics vs free speech reaction, hate labels online misused, cancel culture callout response, defending unpopular beliefs online

If you are the owner of the original video and you want this video removed, please contact: [email protected]

#gaming #vtuber #reaction