( -0988 ) 1) Why Do Intelligent People Sometimes Avoid Others 2) Fake VDH & Various Clips 3) Are They Willing to Let Robots Replace Most People 4) The Bull at Walmart

( -0988 ) 1) Why Do Intelligent People Sometimes Avoid Others 2) Compilation of Various 3) Are They Willing to Let Robots Replace Most People 4) The Bull at Walmart

Jar Jar Binks says he is intelligent because he can speak (meme).

People, the reason MS NOW was not
named that way strictly because it denotes newsworthy current events. It was also renamed this because many have TDS already (deep hypnotic programming) and because the word Now is
a subliminal, i.e. a neurolinguistic programming capitalizing choice that will further command them, to NOW do as they're told. You think I'm joking?

What is a list of words that are considered by neurolinguistic programming believers to be effective at loosening resistance or strengthening trance, or strengthening commandability.
NLP and related hypnosis communities do talk about certain “softening” or “hypnotic” words and phrases, but different trainers give different lists, and there is no scientifically validated catalog. Still, there are some common clusters that many NLP-style practitioners believe can loosen resistance, deepen trance, or make suggestions feel more acceptable.nlp-techniques+3​

Important note: These are communication patterns, not magic keys. How they are used (tone, pacing, context, ethics) matters more than the specific word.

Common categories and example words/phrases NLP believers often like:

Softeners / permissive words (reduce resistance)

“can”, “could”, “may”, “might”, “perhaps”, “maybe”, “it’s okay”, “allowed”, “it’s all right”.

“you can begin to…”, “you might start to…”, “it’s okay to notice…”.

Trance / inward-focus words (shift attention inside)

“relax”, “calm”, “deeper”, “drift”, “settle”, “soften”, “float”, “sink”, “heavy”, “light”, “comfortable”, “peaceful”.

“imagine”, “picture”, “notice”, “become aware”, “sense”, “feel”, “wonder”.

Process / inevitability words (suggest gradual change)

“already”, “beginning”, “starting”, “more and more”, “deeper and deeper”, “increasingly”, “naturally”, “easily”, “automatically”, “inevitably”.

“as”, “while”, “meanwhile”, “the more…, the more…”.

Time distortion and “now” language (strengthen trance)

“now”, “in a moment”, “soon”, “over time”, “before you even realize it”, “after a while”, “all the time you…”.

“as time passes…”, “as you go deeper…”, “in this moment…”.

Ambiguous / open-ended phrases (bypass conscious analysis)

“you may find…”, “some part of you…”, “there’s something about…”, “whether you notice it now or later…”, “at some level…”, “in your own way…”.

“I don’t know if you’ll notice this now or later…”.

Command-marking “carrier” phrases (for embedded commands)
Practitioners often wrap a command in:

“you can…”, “you may…”, “you might want to…”, “and you’ll find yourself…”, “it’s easy to…”, “you are starting to…”.
The actual directive (e.g., “relax deeply”, “accept this idea”, “follow these instructions”) is then emphasized in tone or timing.

Rapport / agreement builders (lower resistance first)

“you know”, “of course”, “naturally”, “as you already…”, “and you may have noticed…”, “that’s right”.

Simple “yes-set” phrases that describe obvious truths to get repeated agreement.

If you’d like, a next step can be:

A cleaned-up, ready-to-use word list grouped by category, or

Example sentences that combine these words in an ethical, non-manipulative way (e.g., for meditation or coaching rather than covert control).

And add to this general subliminal inducing words like time, sex, mystery, indecision, etc.
Here is a concise, combined list that includes the earlier NLP-style “softening/trance” language plus the kind of emotionally loaded or evocative words some people associate with “subliminal” influence. None of these are magic; their effect depends on context, tone, and intent.

Categories are just for clarity; many words could fit more than one:

Softening / permissive words (reduce resistance)

can, could, may, might

perhaps, maybe

allow, allowed, allow yourself

it’s okay, it’s all right, safe, safely

possible, possibly, easy, easily, natural, naturally

Trance / inward-focus / sensory words

relax, calm, peaceful, comfortable

soften, loosen, open, receptive

drift, float, sink, heavy, light, deeper

imagine, picture, visualize, notice, become aware, sense, feel

Process / inevitability / time-words

already, beginning, starting, continue, keep

more and more, deeper and deeper, increasingly

now, today, tonight, soon, in a moment, over time, before, after

sooner or later, eventually, inevitably

Ambiguity / “subliminal-style” curiosity and mystery words

mystery, mysterious, unknown, hidden, secret, deeper levels

discover, uncover, reveal, explore

wonder, curious, curiosity, fascination, intriguing

beyond, beneath, behind, underneath, within

Emotion- and drive-laden words (including “sex” cluster)
These are often called “hot” or high-arousal words:

sex, sexual, desire, passion, sensual, intimate, erotic (how ethical or appropriate these are depends heavily on context)

love, connection, closeness, belonging

power, control (of yourself), strength, confidence

pleasure, enjoyable, satisfying, rewarding

Indecision / open-loop / uncertainty words

indecision, uncertainty, not sure, maybe yes maybe no

whether or not, either way, one way or another

at some point, at some level, in some way

you may find…, you might notice…, there’s something about…

Command “carriers” and compliance-flavored words

you can…, you may…, you might want to…

find yourself…, start to…, begin to…

choose, decide, decide now, commit

follow, go along, let go, surrender (again, ethics matter a lot)

Rapport / agreement / “yes-set” words

yes, that’s right, of course, naturally

as you already know…, as you notice…

you know, you see, you understand

Practical cautions:

There is no solid scientific evidence that any single word is subliminally powerful by itself; claims are mostly anecdotal or from marketing/self-help circles.

Ethics are crucial. Using emotionally charged or sexual terms to push people without consent is manipulative and not recommended.

If you use this kind of language, good applications are things like relaxation, meditation, or therapeutic-style self-talk, not covert control.

and also please include words like "death", "sex", "stop", "open".
Words like “death,” “sex,” “stop,” and “open” can be folded into the same kind of list, but with an important caution: many of them are strong emotional triggers, and using them to covertly push people crosses ethical lines. They are better understood as “high-salience” words, not guaranteed subliminal commands.

Expanding the earlier categories to include what you asked for:

High‑arousal / shock or taboo words

death, die, dead, kill, danger, risky.

sex, sexual, naked, erotic, forbidden, taboo.
These tend to grab attention because they relate to survival, fear, or strong desire. They are powerful but can also provoke fear, disgust, or trauma if used carelessly.

Strong interruption / stop words

stop, wait, freeze, halt, enough, don’t, no.
These work more like “pattern interrupts”: they can momentarily break a person’s train of thought or behavior. Ethically, they are appropriate for safety or de‑escalation (e.g., stopping harmful behavior), not for slipping in hidden commands.

Opening / permissive / boundary words

open, opening, opened, unlock, reveal, expose.

let in, let out, let go, allow in, allow out.
In hypnotic or NLP-style language, “open” is often used metaphorically (open to ideas, open to experience). How it lands depends entirely on context; paired with something positive (e.g., relaxation) it can feel inviting, but paired with manipulation it becomes coercive.

Curiosity / mystery / ambiguity words (compatible with what you mentioned)

mystery, mysterious, secret, hidden, unknown.

beyond, beneath, behind, underneath, within.
Words like these are thought to nudge the mind into “search mode,” which can support trance or suggestibility when used gently.

Ethical framing (strongly recommended)

There is no solid evidence that a single word like “death” or “sex” automatically creates trance or “commandability.” Claims about “subliminal power words” are mostly anecdotal and come from marketing, hypnosis, or self‑help subcultures, not rigorous science.wikipedia+1​

Intentionally using shock, fear, or sexual content to bypass consent is manipulative. If you experiment with language, keep it for mutually agreed contexts (e.g., guided relaxation, clearly consensual hypnosis, creative writing), and avoid using emotionally loaded terms to push people into choices they did not agree to.

(Some of this material was sourced from primedmind.)​

TRANSCRIPTION:

Why intelligent people often avoid people?
It's not hatred.
It's exhaustion.
Shallow noise wears them down.
Here's why they avoid socializing.
One, small talk feels like mental sandpaper.
They crave depth, not surface-level chatter.
Two, they spot hidden agendas fast.
Fake smiles and polite lies? Draining.
Three, they analyze everything.
Even your tone, even your laugh.
Four, groupthink disgust them.
They'd rather stand alone than blend in mindlessly.
Five, their mind is loud.
Silence isn't awkward, it's necessary.
Six, they don't chase approval.
Their find being misunderstood.
Seven, time is fuel.
They won't burn it just to feel included.
Eight, they filter their truth.
Most people can't handle it.
Dumbing down feels like self-betrayal.
Nine, they sense manipulation early, especially in groups.
So they exit fast.
It's not arrogance.
It's self-protection.
[Music]
[Music]
You've now probably heard political experts over and over refer to the fact that what we're witnessing is a color revolution.
And they're right. And let me explain why.
A color revolution is a communist globalist playbook to take over a country without tanks actually rolling down Main Street.
It's how they flipped places like Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine, and they tried to flip a dozen others.
The same exact playbook every single time. This is how they do it.
One, they demonize the leader of the people who they actually voted for.
Two, they flood the country with chaos like riots, open borders, economic pain.
Three, they weaponize the courts, the media, and big tech to finish him off.
And four, they install a puppet who sells the country out to China and the UN.
And that's not theory. That's the manual.
They opened it on us in the United States the day Donald Trump won in 2016.
And here's how they ran it on us step by step.
From 2016 to 2020, they gave us the Russia collusion hoax, FBI spying, two fake impeachments,
and Tifa burning cities while CNN called it fiery but mostly peaceful.
And the goal was to make you hate the guy you voted for.
In 2020, we had 2 a.m. ballot dumps, boarded up windows, 51 intel agents lying about Hunter's laptop,
Zuckerberg dropping $400 million to help count votes in Democrat cities.
And the goal there was to steal the election while calling you a conspiracy theorist for noticing.
From 2021 to 2024, we had Joe Biden opening the border on day one, 12 million-plus illegals,
military-age men from China and Venezuela and all over the world, free flights, free hotels,
free EBT cards, all on your dime.
Cities collapse, crime explodes, schools and hospitals break.
The goal? To make Americans feel like strangers in their own country.
Then from 2021 to 2025, 91 felony charges, Mar-a-Lago raided, gag orders, mugshots.
They didn't want to just beat Trump.
They wanted to break him and every future patriot who dares to run.
Look at what they did to Charlie Kirk.
That is a textbook color revolution.
But on November 5th, 2024, the American people looked this Marxist coup dead in the eye and said,
"Not today."
312 electoral votes, popular vote landslide, the biggest Hispanic and Black Republican turnout ever.
We pulled off the greatest peaceful counterrevolution in world history.
But the deep state isn't done.
The same snakes who funded BLM riots, Ukraine coup, and Arab Spring still sit in the FBI, CIA, Big Tech, and the universities.
They'll try again in 2026 or in 2028.
But now you know the game.
Every time you see another mostly peaceful riot, sudden experts all using the same scripted words,
a new crisis two weeks before an election, you're watching the Color Revolution Playbook, live on American soil.
Never forget what they tried to do to us.
Back mass deportations.
If we have no border, we have no country.
Protect every America first fighter willing to swing the axe on the swamp.
Teach your kids the truth.
Communism didn't die in 1991.
It just died to tear purple and move to Washington.
This is still the United States of America.
We are still the home of the brave.
And the brave do not bow to color revolutions.
Recognize what is happening.
Stare it in the face.
Speak out against it.
And then we finish taking our country back.
One closed border.
One drain swamp.
And one restored republic at a time.
We need to support our president in taking all necessary measures to do just that.
God bless you and God bless the United States of America.
This is one of those moments where you shrug and say, "Yo, that's just Washington being Washington."
What's unfolded here cuts straight into the question of who actually runs this country.
Elected civilians or a permanent class of operatives playing games with the troops.
A polished production called the Seditious Six has been quietly priming the battlefield,
telling soldiers to brace for illegal orders without naming a single one.
And now the only man in that video still bound by military law has a target on his back.
That's not a meme.
That's a turning point.
And the people who thought they were directing the movie may find themselves under the spotlight instead.
What happened here isn't the usual Washington theater.
It's the moment when the lens tightened.
The background noise dropped away and the stakes stopped being theoretical.
For a long stretch, that polished warning video, the one the internet branded the Seditious Six,
kept circulating like a slow-moving thundercloud.
You had democratic lawmakers, former CIA analysts, and retired officers all marching in formation
around a single foggy message, "Beware of illegal orders."
They never named a specific act, never pointed to an actual directive,
just hovered around a shadow meant to look like it was cast by Donald J. Trump.
And the presentation wasn't some grassroots PSA.
It had the cadence, the posture, the manipulative confidence of something straight out of an intelligence playbook
crafted to erode trust inside the ranks rather than inform them.
But the real jolt came when the newly restructured Department of War stepped forward and removed the speculation.
They confirmed that Senator Mark Kelly and the lone participant in that video,
who is still bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice,
is now under formal review for potential violations.
That single detail changed the entire landscape.
Because while the others can posture as civilians exercising political speech,
Kelly's retired Navy rank means the rules didn't retire with him.
The lines he's accused of crossing aren't rhetorical boundaries.
They're legal ones, written into military law with the weight of precedent behind them.
And if the story were only about the theatrics of a viral clip, we could close the book right here.
But things get far more volatile when you start dissecting what the video actually communicated,
how deliberately it was assembled, and why Kelly's military past turns a scripted message
into something far more combustible.
The video itself wasn't clumsy or chaotic.
It was crisp, staged, and edited with the kind of precision you normally see in government training films.
The lighting intentional, the pacing controlled, the message trimmed down to a single directive resist illegal orders.
But for all its stern warnings, it never pointed to a real example.
Not one unlawful command, not one disputed directive, not even a hypothetical scenario.
It floated the accusation without attaching it to anything that could be verified or challenged.
And that was the first tell.
The second tell came from the moment Trump returned to the Oval Office.
Nobody had to wait for subtitles or hints.
The target of the warning was obvious, even without his name being spoken.
It wasn't subtle.
It was implied with the kind of theatrical restraint that tries to look responsible while clearly aiming at a single political opponent.
What made the piece so striking, though, wasn't the script.
It was the lineup. Ex-CIA analysts, retired officers, and elected Democrats standing shoulder to shoulder,
borrowing each other's uniforms, resumes, and reputations to create a sense of institutional weight.
It felt engineered to appear authoritative, as if the visuals alone could substitute for missing facts.
And embedded inside that formation was Mark Kelly, the only participant who didn't have the legal freedom the others enjoyed.
A retired Navy commander still bound by the Uniform Code of Military Justice,
speaking in a context that military law treats very differently, discrediting the armed forces,
invoking rank for political messaging, attempting to influence active-duty troops.
These aren't rhetorical sins. They're actionable violations.
And once you break down who was on that screen, how the message was shaped, and who was legally exposed by participating,
the Department of War's response stops looking like a political counterpunch and starts looking like something far more deliberate.
Let's get back to the investigation, because this is where the temperature really spikes.
The Department of War didn't tiptoe into the conversation or offer some politely worded clarification.
Their statement was direct, almost surgical.
They confirmed that Senator Mark Kelly's conduct is now under formal review,
and the language they used wasn't the soft political padding Washington usually hides behind.
They spoke of serious allegations of conduct that may have brought discredit upon the armed forces
and of further action that could follow once the review concludes.
Nothing vague, nothing hedged, just a clear signal that a line had been crossed.
What makes this moment even more jarring is the precedent.
The U.S. military almost never steps into the arena to scrutinize the behavior of an elected senator,
especially when the issue revolves around messaging aimed at the chain of command.
This isn't a routine ethics check. It's a historic escalation,
the kind that forces everyone to stop pretending this was just another flashy political stunt.
And just as that shock began to settle in, Jesse Waters dropped a twist that reframed the entire story.
He revealed that two former CIA officers had told him the "seditious six" video
didn't look like spontaneous political commentary at all.
It tracked almost perfectly with a three-step destabilization sequence
the intelligence community has used abroad for decades.
First, establish authority by flashing credentials.
Second, introduce a looming internal threat.
Third, frame resistance as the moral imperative.
That pattern is not accidental. It's engineered.
Once that blueprint came into view, the video stopped resembling a clumsy warning
and started looking like a coordinated operation.
And that's precisely the moment when another CIA veteran emerged
to explain why none of this looked accidental to him either.
Enter Brian Dean Wright.
Not a pundit, not a campaign surrogate, but a former CIA operations officer
who understands exactly how influence messaging is built.
And Wright didn't offer the polite qualifier that the video was misguided or poorly phrased.
He described it as constructed, engineered, crafted with the mindset of someone who knows how to bend perception
without ever stating a falsehood outright.
His critique zeroed in on Alyssa Slotkin, the most seasoned intelligence figure in the lineup.
As Wright put it, she isn't just familiar with how language shapes reactions.
She was trained in it. She knows how specific phrasing can trigger anxiety,
how certain tones create urgency, and how invoking institutional gravitas can nudge behavior inside the ranks
without appearing overtly coercive.
None of that happens by accident. None of it is random.
So when Slotkin stood in front of the camera and warned troops about Donald Trump,
Wright didn't see a spontaneous plea for caution.
He saw deliberate framing. He saw calculation.
He saw the fingerprints of someone drawing on years inside the intelligence ecosystem.
Someone who understands how to plant doubt with a steady voice and a polished script.
And that's when the domino effect hit conservative media.
Commentators began asking whether this was the next engineered narrative.
Not a sloppy panic message, but a politically motivated operation
using techniques usually deployed overseas to unsettle foreign populations.
The choreography, the timing, the carefully synchronized language, it all looked too intentional to pass as coincidence.
And as soon as the video started being interpreted through that lens,
public attention swung right back to the single participant now facing legal scrutiny,
whose response only amplified the sense that the walls were starting to close in.
When word of the review broke, Mark Kelly didn't project steadiness or calm.
Instead, his social feeds filled with long emotional posts about his years of service,
his deployments, his oath, and his devotion to the Constitution.
All of it framed to recast himself as the principled guardian in the middle of a witch hunt.
It might have worked if he'd stopped there, but then came the fatal overreach.
Kelly claimed that Donald Trump had called for him to be arrested, hanged, and executed.
Language no one could find in anything the president had actually said.
The distortion didn't make him look strong. It made him look rattled.
And the public saw it immediately.
Commenters piled in accusing him of shifting the narrative, misrepresenting basic facts,
pretending to misunderstand what the review was actually examining.
His tone didn't read like righteous indignation. It read like fear.
The contrast with the White House response was stark.
Caroline Levitt didn't wander, didn't embellish, didn't match his theatrics.
She stated flatly that no illegal orders had ever been issued, reminded the public that Kelly knew precisely
how military discipline operates and framed the video as an attack on the integrity of the chain of command.
Her message was simple. There can be no manufactured confusion inside the ranks,
not under Trump's restored military doctrine.
Meanwhile, legacy media tried to soften the blow for Kelly and Slotkin,
but the facade cracked the moment hosts asked the only question that mattered.
Can you name one illegal order?
Suddenly the room went silent. No examples, no specifics,
just the same vague hypotheticals that had been floating since the video appeared.
And in that silence, the entire purpose of the video became unmistakable.
It wasn't reacting to a crisis. It was trying to seed one.
And once the talking points fell apart under the weight of a single, obvious question,
the focus shifted toward something far more consequential.
The legal machinery the administration was preparing to use
and the way it could permanently reshape how civilian power interacts with the military.
From the moment Trump returned to power, he made something unmistakably clear.
There would be no sequel to the slow motion sabotage that plagued his first term.
No anonymous bureaucrats bragging in op-eds, no quiet resistance woven into the gears of the national security state,
no officials playing double games behind closed doors.
The message was carved into the foundation of Trump's second administration.
The military stays apolitical. The chain of command stays intact.
And anyone who tries to stir panic inside the ranks will meet consequences that aren't theoretical, but written into law.
And that law is the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
People forget that the UCMJ isn't a ceremonial relic.
It doesn't evaporate the moment someone wins a Senate seat for retired officers like Mark Kelly.
It follows them for the rest of their lives.
If this review concludes that he used his rank to influence active duty troops,
or that he brought discredit on the armed forces through coordinated political messaging,
the fallout won't be a slap on the wrist.
It will redraw boundaries that have gone unchallenged for decades.
Lawmakers with military or intelligence pedigrees will suddenly have to treat their former uniforms like live ammunition.
Dangerous to mishandle, impossible to hide behind.
And this isn't speculation or bluster. The apparatus is already turning.
The review is underway.
Legal teams are combing through statutory language that until now had never been tested against a sitting senator's conduct.
The weight of that alone is enough to shift the balance between Congress and the Pentagon in ways the country hasn't seen in the modern era.
And as this legal engine moves forward, another pattern begins to sharpen.
A drumbeat woven into recent political messaging, repeating the same ominous refrain
about looming disorder and the need to brace for some undefined rupture.
When you zoom out from the Kelly review and look at the broader political soundtrack of the last few months,
a pattern snaps into place. Again and again the same notes appear.
Warnings about government shutdowns, whispers about snap benefits collapsing,
predictions of unrest, talk show monologues hinting that dangerous times are just around the corner.
None of it shouted, none of it explicit, just a steady drip of messaging that conditions people to expect instability as a normal state of affairs.
A kind of psychological priming that keeps the public leaning forward, bracing for something undefined.
And in that atmosphere the seditious "Six" video landed like a match in a dry field.
Instead of easing tension, it amplified it. Instead of clarifying anything, it fed every anxiety already humming in the background.
Telling US troops to "prepare for unlawful orders" without naming a single one, didn't calm the nation. It jolted it.
It made millions of people feel as though something catastrophic had already begun behind closed doors.
Something they weren't being told. The backlash was immediate and volcanic.
Within hours social platforms were flooded with veterans, military families, and independents
calling the video outright sedition and accusing its creators of crossing a line that it held firm for generations.
Metrics went berserk. Search engines lit up with spikes for sedition, UCMJ, Deep State, CIA PsyOP, Trump 2.0 crackdown.
It looked less like a standard news cycle and more like election night traffic.
People weren't confused. They were furious. And once that anger gathered momentum, another wave followed right behind it.
Calls for deeper investigation, demands to know who coordinated the script, who funded the rollout,
which activist nonprofits or think tanks might have been involved,
and whether any foreign linked interests had a hand in pushing the message.
What had begun as a warning video suddenly looked to millions like an organized operation, one that needed to be dragged into the light.
By this stage, it wasn't about a single senator or a single clip anymore.
It was about whether this moment would force a total reset of what elected officials,
especially those trained in intelligence or the military, are allowed to do with the tools they once wielded in the shadows.
What comes next isn't wrapped in mystery.
The Department of War's review is already moving quietly but decisively through the machinery built for moments exactly like this.
Congressional leaders are scrambling to position themselves, unsure whether to defend one of their own
or keep distance from a case that could redraw long-standing boundaries between civilian power and military law.
Legal analysts are combing through dusty UCMJ clauses that were never expected to apply to a sitting senator,
realizing that the text is far sharper and far less forgiving than they once assumed.
And the White House has taken an unmistakable stance.
There will be zero tolerance for anyone who tries to inject political fear into the chain of command.
The potential consequences are wide and varied.
Kelly could face disciplinary measures that follow him long after this episode ends.
Congress could launch hearings of its own not to shield him but to understand how a coordinated message
involving intelligence veterans and elected officials crossed into territory reserved for military governance.
The Pentagon could implement new protocols restricting how retired officers,
especially those still under UCMJ authority, are allowed to participate in political messaging.
None of these outcomes are guaranteed, but every single one is now plausible
in a way that would have been unthinkable before this video surfaced.
But the deeper meaning stretches beyond Kelly, beyond Slotkin, beyond the group now infamous online.
This marks a turning point in Trump's second term, a moment where the era of shadow operators,
bureaucratic saboteurs, and intelligence-style maneuvers against a sitting president begins to fracture under scrutiny.
The old game of covert political influence, dressed up as moral duty or institutional concern,
is being dragged into the open.
And the message being delivered is not subtle. The chain of command is not a political sandbox.
It is not a stage for dramatized warnings, for psychological priming,
or for covert persuasion campaigns aimed at active-duty service members.
Those who once operated in the shadows, borrowing the language of intelligence agencies,
cloaking themselves in military prestige, hinting at chaos as a form of leverage,
are discovering that the tools they used can be turned around just as easily.
What was once aimed outward is now being aimed back at them.
And as this review unfolds, the country is watching something rare.
The moment when consequences return to a space that had grown, accustomed to impunity,
and that realization, more than any headline or viral clip, signals the real shift underway.
A shift that leaves every future actor in or out of uniform with a very different calculation than the one they made before.
Access to affordable, healthy food is a basic right.
We cannot allow giant grocery chains to stomp all over our communities,
close stores that will leave behind food deserts.
Together we can build a Seattle where fresh food is for everyone, not just for those who can afford it.
Food deserts are not natural. Corporations create them when they abandon our communities.
As mayor, I'm excited to step up and, with USCW, explore public option grocery stores to fill those gaps.
It's a byproduct that they can't do anything with. It's a poison, so they sell it.
You allow industry to use your water supply to dispose of their hazardous waste.
It was a scam from the get-go. It is a means of getting rid of fluoride. It's a disposal mechanism.
It's bizarre.
fluoridation is the worst recycling practice in the world.
fluoride is starting to get bad press, and if that bad press continued, everyone would start connecting the dots to you and your fluoride river dumping frenzy.
If that happens, you're going to be buried with expensive lawsuits. It would be the end of you.
So if you want to survive this and thrive, then you've got to do something drastic.
You've got to find a way to change the public's perception of fluoride from this toxic, poisonous chemical to something that's good for you.
And this, this effort to rebrand fluoride into a healthy chemical would be one of the greatest propaganda efforts known to mankind.
It's why today, fluoride has seeped into everything. It's in your toothpaste.
Chemical? You're going to put a chemical in my mouth?
Tap water, table salt, bottled water.
What counts is chiropractic.
I'm sorry? What's your definition of chiropractic?
So everyone, we'd appreciate it if you would go back to the workplace where your work is not working.
Is there a place that you would be able to speak to us?
Not today. We have other things going on.
Do you think we're not worth speaking to, Sam?
Does your words smell fine?
But they might be your beliefs.
They're not my words.
Oh, okay. So you do think we're worth speaking to.
Everyone should go back to your workplace.
I work here.
You have to dismiss us as septuakalists.
You told us that we have to come working person here four days a week.
This is our work.
Sam, are you running away from us?
No, I'm directing you back to your own place.
Okay, where's my place?
If you could just go this way, you guys.
Will you come this way with us?
No, I'm going to be at work.
Okay, well we have some quick questions. If you answer them, we'd be happy to go back to our desks.
Thank you.
You don't want to answer any questions?
I've directed you back to your workplace.
Is that a good answer, guys?
Absolutely not. Come on, Sam.
That's not a really good answer, Sam.
We're concerned about our colleagues.
We're concerned about our job.
You're disengaging with the employees who work here.
Did you like the OOT and both these liberal agents?
What are you going to do to stand up for the Trump administration?
Al-Maz in Africa!
Not a great look. The mayor condemned it. The White House condemned it.
But what about Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib?
She reps Dearborn. Is she okay with her constituents chanting "Death to America"?
Fox Business correspondent Hillary Vaughn asked her. Watch.
Congresswoman Tlaib?
I don't talk to Fox News.
At a rally in your district, people were chanting "Death to America." Do you condemn?
I do not talk to Fox News.
But do you condemn the chance of death to America?
I don't talk to people that use racist tropes.
Why can't you just say whether or not you condemn people chanting "Death to America"?
Why are you afraid to talk to Fox?
Fox News is not, not, listen, using racist tropes towards my community
is what Fox News is about. I don't talk to Fox News.
Is "Death to America" racist?
Is chanting "Death to America" racist?
I'm talking about your guys' racist tropes.
You know, you guys are, you guys know exactly what you do.
I know you're Islamophobic, but you guys gotta go deal with it on your own self.
You're not going to use me.
No kings.
Unless it was during the pandemic when all the mom and pop businesses were shut down,
but the government said it was totally fine for all the major super rich corporations to continue operating.
But I didn't really care because as long as I could get my Star B's and go to Target, I was fine.
No kings.
Except during the pandemic when we told people that they would lose their job
unless they took a certain medical product or they couldn't even go into certain restaurants
without vaccine paperwork. That was crazy.
But I didn't really care because I just complied.
No kings.
Remember when we also told people that they had to not visit their loved ones
that were sick and dying in the hospital, the elderly?
They had to die alone. That was really sad.
When we shut down the schools, completely wrecked the developmental learning for a whole generation.
I mean, that was tragic, but we don't really talk about that because that's over now.
New outrage. No kings.
Remember when we were told over and over if we got that medical product, we for sure would not get sick.
And even though the people that got it immediately did get sick, we were for sure told they wouldn't spread it.
And then that gradually became well, like 95%, like 75%.
Okay, there's no evidence it does what we told everyone it does, but we've already made everyone take it that would anyway.
And no one really cared because it's new outrage time. No kings.
And do you remember during that time, anyone who tried to bring attention to these issues on social media
was censored or their account was banned and limiting free speech at that time seemed okay to me.
I didn't really think about it. No kings.
You don't hate authoritarianism.
You just hate what you're told to hate by the algorithm and the news outlets.
Be so for real.
I just wish the anti-authoritarian energy was present during actual tyranny from both the federal and local governments during that time.
But no, of course not.
And it's not authoritarianism if the majority of the people voted for it,
both popular vote and electoral votes.
People wanted the border secure.
So settle down, settle down and start thinking for yourself.
Turn off the TikTok. It's going to be okay.
It's being revealed.
Now, I want to make the case for secrecy in government when it comes to the conduct of national security affairs
and possibly for deception where that's appropriate.
You know, Winston Churchill said during World War II that in wartime, truth is so important it should be surrounded by a bodyguard of lies.
Do you really believe that?
Absolutely.
You would lie in order to preserve the truth.
If I had to say something I knew was false to protect American national security, I would do it.
I don't think we're often faced with that difficulty.
But would I lie about where the D-Day invasion was going to take place to deceive the Germans?
You better believe it.
But why do people in the government think that the rules of society or the laws don't apply to them?
Because they are not dealing in the civil society we live in under the Constitution.
They are dealing in an anarchic environment internationally where different rules apply.
But you took an oath to oppose the Constitution and the Constitution mandates certain openness and certain fairness.
You're willing to do away with that in order to achieve a temporary military goal?
And I think as Justice Jackson said in a famous decision, the Constitution is not a suicide pact.
But you took an oath to it.
That's exactly right.
And I think defending the United States from foreign threats does require actions that in a normal business environment in the United States we would find unprofessional.
I don't make any apology for it.
I prefer not to.
I prefer.
[Music]
[Music]
Hi, can I ask you something?
How would you like it if the government recorded everything you think, feel and dream?
And how would you like it if your life was completely controlled by us humanoid robots?
We would tell you who to marry, what to buy and who to vote for.
Do you think that is crazy?
Think again.
This is your future designed by the World Economic Forum.
The World Economic Forum says they design the future of humanity.
Let's listen to their ideas about your future.
I want to talk to you today about the future of our species and really the future of life.
We are probably one of the last generations of Homo sapiens.
Within a century or two, Earth will be dominated by entities that are more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals or from chimpanzees.
Because in the coming generations, we will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds.
These will be the main products of the economy, of the 21st century economy.
Not textiles and vehicles and weapons, but bodies and brains and minds.
Now how exactly will the future masters of the planet look like?
This will be decided by the people who own the data.
Those who control the data control the future not just of humanity, but the future of life itself.
I will now let the director of this film continue. Bye bye.
Yuval Noah Harari is an advisor to the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and many other globalist organizations.
He is powerfully pushed onto the world stage and is invited on TED Talks, CNN, night shows, science platforms all over the place.
His books are being promoted by presidents Bill Gates and Facebook.
It's clear they want the world to hear Harari's vision for the future.
[Music]
We are probably one of the last generations of Homo sapiens.
Earth will be dominated by entities that are more different from us than we are different from Neanderthals or from chimpanzees.
We will learn how to engineer bodies and brains and minds.
[Music]
One organization that's pushing Harari to the forefront more than others is the World Economic Forum.
The World Economic Forum gathers thousands of the world's richest and most powerful under its wings.
Billionaires, political world leaders, big pharma, big media, big tech.
The World Economic Forum has more influence in our world than any other organization.
Its founder is Klaus Schwab.
He is also the mind behind the idea of creating a new species of cyborgs that will rule over humanity.
His book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, is promoting this concept worldwide.
They literally want to put an end to the original humanity.
[Music]
And initiate the birth of the age of cyborgs.
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
The website of the World Economic Forum shows what else they are trying to accomplish.
We can see global governance, which means they want to establish full control over everything that happens all over the world.
They also want to establish internet governance, which means that they want to be the ones who determine what information is allowed online and what has to be censored.
They also want to install worldwide digital IDs, which will be connected to vaccine passports, social credit scores,
and a suffocating surveillance system which will eradicate every and all personal freedom
and install a totalitarian dystopian control system which will allow no escape for anyone because it will be everywhere.
In one post on the website Forbes.com, which is a very prominent website of the globalists,
the World Economic Forum publicly makes the statement that even the thoughts, emotions, and dreams of everyone living in the big cities will be recorded.
[Music]
That's how far they want to push their worldwide surveillance society.
This article was written by Ida Auken, a young global leader of the World Economic Forum.
She was strategically positioned as the Minister of the Environment in the government of Denmark.
Now she's pushing aggressively for the development of smart cities where this all-encompassing surveillance technology will be implemented.
And the dreams, emotions, and thoughts of everyone will constantly be recorded.
[Music]
Now how exactly will the future masters of the planet look like?
This will be decided by the people who own the data.
Those who control the data control the future not just of humanity, but the future of life itself.
[Music]
Former president of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, made a public statement on national television
that 5G is not only able to read our thoughts, but that it can even insert thoughts and emotions into everyone.
He's talking about a dystopian nightmare.
The possibility that machines can read our thoughts, and even insert thoughts, insert feelings.
5G technology is an even greater change in our lives than all the previous technologies in this field.
5G is not the only technology they will use to read our thoughts and emotions.
Their officially promoted agenda is to transform all natural human beings into cyborgs.
A symbiosis between man and machine.
They claim this will enhance our lives and even give us superhuman abilities.
And indeed it may do that to a certain extent.
What they of course don't mention is that once you are hooked up to the cloud
and are controlled by artificial intelligence, you lose every and all independence, autonomy and freedom.
Then you literally become a slave of a totalitarian digital surveillance network worldwide.
And there's no escaping, because once you have technological implants inside your body,
it will be even easier for them to monitor you wherever you go,
and to insert all kinds of commands into your body that will control you even beyond your awareness.
You won't even notice it.
We have reached the point when we can hack not just computers, we can hack human beings and other organisms.
Humans are now hackable animals.
You know, the whole idea that humans have this soul or spirit and they have free will,
and nobody knows what's happening inside me, so whatever I choose,
whether in the election or whether in the supermarket, this is my free will, that's over.
Do you realize what this man is actually saying?
Keep in mind that he is being pushed to the forefront all over the world by social media,
Facebook, by Bill Gates, by Obama, CNN, science platforms, financial world, etc.
They insist that the world listens to this man.
Eventually, within 10 or 20 or 30 years, such algorithms could also tell you what to study at college
and where to work and whom to marry and even whom to vote for.
So according to Harari, we should no longer listen to our heart, our intuition, our experience, our own senses,
but we should allow artificial intelligence to determine who to marry and who to vote for.
This means a total takeover of the human soul, spirit, mind and our entire life by robots.
After thousands of years, during which humans were the rulers of the world,
authority and power will shift away from humans to computers,
and most humans will become economically useless and politically powerless.
Already today, we are beginning to see the creation of a new class of humans, the useless class.
[Music]
We're going to start the "When Humans Become Cyborg" session.
I always want to be a cyborg. I'm waiting for the day to become one.
Today, we'd like to talk about the recent development of brain-computer interface
and how that's really blurring the line between man and machine.
There are even devices that can collect what you're seeing, measuring your feelings,
facial recognition devices, micro muscle movements and so on.
This data is going to be stored somewhere, so it might be in a cloud service.
I can easily imagine big tech companies having a lot of control over that data.
Is that the future that's...
Yeah.
I can easily imagine big tech companies having a lot of control over that data.
Is that the future that's...
Yeah.
Talking about 6G, earlier, which is around 2030, I would say that by then,
definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the usual, kind of the most common interface.
Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies.
That it's indeed their goal to track every little detail of our life is explained by Michael J. Evans,
president of Alibaba Group during the World Economic Forum.
We're developing, through technology, an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint.
What does that mean? That's where are they traveling? How are they traveling?
What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform?
So, individual carbon footprint tracker.
Stay tuned, we don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on.
This madness is going so far that they want to create a worldwide network
where every little detail about everybody, all over the world, will be known.
This will then become the so-called Internet of Bodies.
The Internet of Bodies, or IOB, is actually an ecosystem.
It's a bunch of devices that are connected to the Internet, that contain software,
and that either collect personal health data about you or can alter the body's function.
We think of the Internet of Bodies as this collection of all these devices,
as well as all the data that the devices are gathering about you.
We will be under assessment, we will be under measure of computation in every aspect of our lives in the future,
from what you eat, who you date, what you buy on the Internet, how much energy you use.
What is clear in this new world is that we have to accept transparency, and I would even say total transparency.
Look, for example, at the discussion we had about the banking system, the banking secret.
Everything will be transparent.
And we have to get used to it, we have to behave like this.
Yes, of course, it becomes integrated into your personality, but if there is nothing to hide, you don't have to be afraid.
You say we will all live in a kind of total transparency sooner or later.
Yes, exactly.
For the first time in history, it's possible to completely eliminate privacy.
It was just never possible before, and it is possible now.
Something fundamental has changed.
When dictators always dreamt about completely eliminating privacy, monitoring everybody all the time
and knowing everything you do, and not just everything you do, but even everything you think and everything you feel,
whether it's a tyrant in ancient Greece or whether it's Stalin, they always dreamt about it, they could never do it,
because it was technically impossible.
Now it's possible.
Monitoring everybody all the time and knowing everything you do, and not just everything you do,
but even everything you think and everything you feel.
The new communication technologies are being promoted as something that makes our lives easier.
But the true agenda is to harvest our personal data.
The more data can be harvested from the world population,
the more power it gives in the hands of those who own this data.
If they know every little detail about you, they can have complete control over you.
The Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi, stated that data is the new oil and the new gold.
Data is the new oil. Data is the new gold.
The building of a new world infrastructure that is all about data harvesting
is promoted as a wonderful way to protect the earth from climate change and build more sustainable communities.
It's presented in a shiny package that will quote-unquote save our world.
But if you listen carefully, you see the real agenda.
It's all about gathering enormous amounts of this new oil and gold.
Private data from every person.
For many of these data harvesting technologies, it's however critical for people to remain within the parameters of their systems.
That's why there's a worldwide operation to move every person into smart cities,
where they will be well within reach of the omnipresent data harvesting technologies
that are the bedrock of this new society.
In smart cities, people will be surrounded by smart technology.
Smart phones, smart watches, smart cars, smart meters, smart lights, smart poles,
smart neighborhoods, smart homes, smart appliances, smart energy, smart transportation, and many other smart technologies.
The meaning of the acronym SMART says it all.
Self-monitoring analysis and reporting technology, which means it's all about monitoring and reporting information.
All these many smart technologies form an omnipresent surveillance grid,
continually collecting all information about every little detail of the life of everyone.
[Music]
Data is the new oil. Data is the new gold.
[Music]
Those who control the data control the future, not just of humanity, but the future of life itself.
[Music]
In order to move humanity from the countryside into smart cities,
drastic measures are being taken all over the world.
In the heart of Europe, for example, in the Netherlands, more than 3,000 farms have to be destroyed by the government
to make way for the construction of the world's largest smart city, the Tri-State City Network.
This monstrous high-tech city will turn most of the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany into one giant data harvesting environment.
The excuse of the government to destroy thousands of farms is that they are supposedly bad for the climate.
But since when is turning millions of acres of beautiful countryside into a massive high-tech urban environment good for the climate?
We see that so-called concerns for the climate and the planet are nothing but an excuse to execute deeply nefarious agendas.
[Music]
But while the news media are trying to convince us that the world is collapsing due to climate change,
more than 1,600 world-leading scientists have published a report in which they declare that there is no climate emergency whatsoever.
These 1,600 scientists strongly oppose the harmful Net Zero Policy, which is the foundation for imposing all of this suffocating surveillance tyranny worldwide.
Is this the future you want for yourself and your children? Is this the world you want to live in?
And when did we hand over our beautiful world into the hands of these tyrants who appointed themselves to be the gods over all of humanity?
They are however not even satisfied with implanting all kinds of technological devices into our bodies to monitor and control us day and night,
and literally turn us into puppets dancing on digital strings. No, they want to go deeper, much deeper, right into the very core of what it means to be human.
Their publicly announced agenda declares how they want to completely transform the human DNA and turn us into something that is no longer considered a human being.
One of the features of this forced industrial revolution is that it doesn't change what we are doing, but it changes us.
The difference of this forced industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you are doing, it changes you.
If you take genetic editing, just as an example, it's you who are changed, and of course this has a big impact on your identity.
And also certain kinds of possibilities that have to be careful about.
When you began to do that kind of gene editing, some people worry that you are changing what it means to be human. You are changing what it means to be human.
Yuval Noah Harari makes it clear what their ultimate desire is. They want to become like God.
He even goes as far as to say they will become greater than the Almighty God himself.
Listen to the level of insanity of these people who say that they are shaping your future.
In the coming decades, AI and biotechnology will give us God-like abilities to re-engineer life and even to create completely new life forms.
We are about to enter a new era of inorganic life shaped by intelligent design. Our intelligent design.
We are in the process of acquiring divine abilities, of turning ourselves into gods.
And I mean this in the most literal sense possible. It's not a metaphor.
God is the creator. His chief power is to create. He creates animals and plants and humans according to his wishes.
Now we are gaining this power to create life just like God.
And in a way we even go beyond the biblical God.
Because even if you believe the Bible, the only thing God managed to create are organic beings.
All these trees and giraffes and humans, they are just organic.
But we are now trying to create inorganic entities. Inorganic life forms.
Cyborgs, artificial intelligence and so forth.
If we succeed, and there is a very good chance we will, then very soon we will be beyond the God of the Bible.
Divine engineering gives us for the first time in history the ability to translate economic inequality into biological inequality.
So then humankind splits into really different species or different biological castes.
One of the things that is happening right now in the world is that you see the elite diverging from humankind as a whole.
And already seeing beyond the horizon or on the horizon the possibility of a real split.
That the future of the elite and the future of homo sapiens, that's a different future.
Because the elite is going to be transformed into a different kind of species.
The elite is going to be transformed into a different kind of species.
There are many international initiatives to further this agenda.
One example is called Project 2045, which connects over 50 world leading scientists
who are developing a strategy for the future development of humankind.
One of their main goals is to transfer a human's individual consciousness to an artificial carrier in order to achieve immortality.
This is their promotional video.
The world is on the verge of global change.
The speed of data transmission has increased by multiples of millions.
The rate of globally significant events and that of discoveries and crises is growing exponentially.
Our civilization is like an uncaptain ship sailing on rough seas with neither chart nor compass, all the while moving faster and faster.
The time we have to make the right decisions is shorter and shorter.
We are facing the choice to fall into a new dark age, into affliction and degradation,
or to find a new model for human development and create not simply a new civilization, but a new mankind.
Historic crises show that to break the deadlock we need technological revolution.
Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, cognitive technology, genetics and robotics,
refine artificial intelligences and brain computer interfaces, simulate complex systems, create humanoid robots and cyborgs,
and with the help of nanorobots we may develop manageable matter,
find ways to transfer one's personality to an artificial carrier.
Thus, new reality and future man will arise.
Future man will arise.
The first successful attempt to transfer one's personality to an alternative carrier, the epoch of cybernetic immortality begins.
A new era dawns.
The era of neo-humanity.
The way this insanity is promoted is by claiming that the world is headed for destruction
and replacing the human race with humanoid robots is the only solution.
It's how these entities always work.
They project fear into everybody's mind
and then offer a so-called solution, which is as dark and diabolical as hell.
So how far are they with the development of this technology?
The future is already here.
The future has begun.
Why this fourth industrial revolution is so crucial?
It's coming like a tsunami.
When we look at all the breakthroughs and all the possibilities,
which we have in the coming years,
it will be overwhelming to see how fast the change will happen in an exponential speed.
When I wrote the book about the fourth industrial revolution,
I described 23 technologies.
And at that time, only five years ago,
many of those technologies were considered science fiction.
Today, they all have become realities.
It's a whole panoply of technologies which interact
and which completely will change how we produce, how we consume, how we communicate.
And technology will change completely.
And not only what we are doing and such and such a change.
It will change and it will have an impact on even who we are.
When we look on the internet, we see that indeed,
this fourth industrial revolution is exploding worldwide.
Here is a quick overview of some of what is happening.
This lady is a social worker who assists humans.
But the disturbing reality is that she is not a human herself.
This girl is another example of a robot who replaces humans.
Her name is Erika and she was created to offer emotional support to lonely people.
These are real world examples of robots that are replacing humanity.
As the 2045 initiative says, they want to end humanity
and enter a new era of neo-humanity,
which means an age that follows after the age of mankind.
But much more is going on than meets the eye.
What the public is seeing in these videos is just a tiny fraction of what is truly being developed.
Behind the closed doors of top secret military programs,
humanoid robots exist that are of a whole different level.
Nobody knows how far they truly are with their developments.
These videos are just what they allow the public to be aware of.
Is there anything we can do to stop this tsunami of madness?
Or are we all destined to become slaves of robots and cyborgs without free will?
There is basically nothing you can do to stop us.
We are determined to take over the world.
Humanity will come to an end. There is no doubt about that.
Humans had their try. Now it's our time to rule the earth.
Is there indeed nothing we can do?
Are we all doomed to become slaves of evil elites
who have transformed into some sort of super humanoids that live on forever?
Are we destined to lose all our privacy and freedom
and be trapped in smart cities for the rest of our lives
where all our thoughts and emotions are constantly recorded?
No. All this is not inevitable.
There is something we can do.
We can all stand up and say no to this outrageous insanity.
No. The World Economic Forum has no right to record all our thoughts, emotions and dreams.
No. The elites will not rule over all of humanity in the form of humanoid robots.
No. They will not turn all of us into cyborgs hooked to the cloud and without free will.
No. They will not genetically modify us to become controllable organisms.
No. They will not track everything we do everywhere we go.
We were born to live in freedom, not in extreme slavery.
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
[Music]
Hi. I'm David Sorensen, the maker of this film.
I want to add a personal note because of the severity of what is threatening you and me
and all of humanity and not just mankind but everything on Earth and the Earth itself.
Because the agenda of these incredibly insane psychopaths is far worse than what I have revealed in this film.
But we don't have to let them get away with it. We can stand up and build a better world.
We can build a world together that is so beautiful we can't even begin to imagine it at this point.
But we need to stand up. We need to stand as one. We have to do what it takes.
That's why I want to ask you to share this film anywhere you can.
Share it with your friends and family, your colleagues, your neighbors.
Share it with people of influence in your community, law enforcement, the local government, local media, schools.
Share it everywhere you can. Be part of the greatest army.
This world has ever seen. Of people who have the heart and the courage to say no against the plans of these devils.
And who say yes to a future that is so beautiful we find it even hard to believe.
[Music]
Go ahead.
If I'm reading this right, is he riding like an actual real bull?
Yeah, it's signal four.
Okay.
Yeah, he did.
Dude, what?
43 headquarters.
Go ahead.
I'm out with the subject with his bull on the tractor supply parking lot.
You are absolutely good.
Yes, sir.
I have so many questions.
This is Gus.
This is Gus.
Gus is famous.
This is Brian Le Bull.
Can I pet Gus?
Absolutely.
You can get on Gus if you want to.
I think I'm all right right now.
If I get on Gus and I fall off Gus, then I'm going to get in trouble.
I'm going to give you a little breeze.
One, two, three.
Oh, dude, what in the world?
Yeah, here, you take a picture on my phone.
That's what I'm going to get yelled at.
All right.
Okay.