🔥Tony Greenstein vs Dr Phil Bevin: Is Defend Our Juries a Psyop?

Is Defend Our Juries legitimate Palestine solidarity activism — or a Deep State psyop designed to get activists convicted and neutralize the movement?

In this explosive 90-minute Deep Dive Perspective debate, author and activist Tony Greenstein goes head-to-head with Dr Phil Bevin to answer the most controversial question dividing the UK Palestine solidarity movement right now. This isn't just political theatre — this debate has real consequences for activists risking prison to stop British complicity in Israel's actions in Gaza.

🔥 THE DEBATE THAT'S DIVIDING THE LEFT:

Defend Our Juries (DOJ) is Britain's largest civil disobedience campaign this century, supporting Palestine Action activists who've shut down Israeli arms manufacturing facilities across the UK. But explosive allegations have emerged claiming DOJ is actually controlled opposition — a psyop designed to funnel activists into the criminal justice system where they face conviction, criminal records, and neutralization.

Tony Greenstein and Dr Phil Bevin represent two completely opposite positions on this critical question. One argues DOJ is genuine grassroots resistance against UK complicity in Gaza genocide. The other presents evidence suggesting DOJ exhibits classic hallmarks of state infiltration and controlled opposition.

🔔 SUBSCRIBE to Deep Dive Perspective for more debates the establishment doesn't want you to see. / @deepdiveperspective

📌 WATCH NOW: • Middle East Conflicts • Political Exposures • DDP Clips

Timestamps and Highlights:
00:00:00 - Intro: A War of Words on the Left
00:02:49 - The Core Allegation: Is "Defend Our Juries" a Police Psyop?
00:06:21 - EXPOSED: The Letter Proving Police Encouraged Mass Arrests
00:08:12 - The Money Trail: Links to Former CIA Officers
00:09:07 - Tony Greenstein's Rebuttal: "Fantasy Conspiracy Theories"
00:12:28 - Defending the Defectors: Should We Welcome Traitors to the Ruling Class?
00:19:02 - Dr. Bevin's Case: The Campaign Has "Demonstrably Failed"
00:22:25 - BOMBSHELL LINK: How Roger Hallam is a US "Asset"
00:25:26 - The Technical Difficulties (And Tony Greenstein's Response)
00:33:04 - Tony Greenstein is Confronted with Evidence of Intelligence Involvement
00:50:39 - The Police Spy Playbook: Infiltration & "Creating a Legend"
00:55:23 - What's the Alternative? The Debate Over Strategy

This Deep Dive Perspective debate goes where mainstream media refuses to go. Tony Greenstein brings decades of Palestine solidarity activism and anti-Zionism organizing. Dr Phil Bevin provides critical analysis of movement strategy and state infiltration patterns. Both are deeply committed to Palestinian liberation — but they fundamentally disagree on whether Defend Our Juries helps or harms that cause.

🇵🇸 WHY THIS DEBATE MATTERS FOR PALESTINE SOLIDARITY:

The stakes couldn't be higher. Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed over 40,000 Palestinians according to Gaza health authorities. UK-manufactured weapons and components are being used in Israeli military operations. British activists are risking everything to physically shut down the arms supply chain through direct action against Elbit Systems and other Israeli military contractors.

But if Defend Our Juries is actually a psyop — controlled opposition designed to neutralize the most committed activists by funneling them into criminal convictions — then the Palestine solidarity movement is being systematically dismantled from within. Activists are getting criminal records, losing employment, facing prison time, and achieving minimal material impact on Israel's military capabilities.

#DefendOurJuries #PolicePsyop #Psyop #TonyGreenstein #PhilBevin #PalestineAction #protest

⚖️ IMPORTANT CONTEXT & DISCLAIMER:

This debate presents two opposing perspectives on Defend Our Juries and Palestine solidarity strategy. Tony Greenstein argues DOJ is legitimate resistance; Dr Phil Bevin presents concerns about controlled opposition patterns. Neither position represents Deep Dive Perspective's official stance.

Viewers should research multiple sources, examine the evidence presented by both debaters, and form their own conclusions about Defend Our Juries, Palestine Action, and effective solidarity tactics. This debate is intended to inform activist decision-making, not to provide definitive answers to complex strategic questions.

All references to Gaza casualties, UK arms sales to Israel, and Israeli military operations are based on publicly available reporting from human rights organizations, UK government data, and international media sources. Deep Dive Perspective does not independently verify these claims but presents them as context for understanding the urgency driving Palestine solidarity activism.