Danesh Noshirvan Flees Questions on Federal Courthouse Steps Over 2257 Violations

4 days ago
6

On May 20, 2025, outside the Fort Myers Federal Courthouse, TikTok agitator and self-styled “accountability activist” Danesh Noshirvan faced the one question he has never been able to outrun: Why hasn’t he complied with the federal age-verification laws that govern commercial pornography producers under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2257 and 2257A?

The moment reporters raised the issue, Noshirvan — who openly runs an OnlyFans commercial pornography account — panicked. Cameras captured him freezing, stammering, and physically retreating behind his lawyer, Attorney Nicholas Chiappetta, while legal assistant Vicki Modaffari tried to block the press. It was a stunning public collapse for a man who normally bullies others into answering his questions.

But the questions aren’t optional. Under §§ 2257 and 2257A, every sexually explicit content producer must maintain verified model releases, including government-issued identification, date-of-production logs, and accessible record-custodian information for law enforcement inspection. These laws were enacted, as the Congressional Record states, “to prevent minors from appearing in pornography by forcing producers to verify and document proof of age.” Congress placed the burden squarely on producers because they are “in the best position to confirm age at the time of production.”

In 2006, Congress expanded these protections under the Adam Walsh Act, creating § 2257A to shut down loopholes used by “secondary producers” — website operators, compilers, distributors, and digital remixers who attempted to avoid compliance while circulating explicit images. Congress emphasized that every entity involved in production or distribution must maintain traceable records, ensuring law enforcement could verify ages and investigate suspected child-exploitation efficiently.

Noshirvan’s refusal to answer questions raises the unavoidable issue: Has he failed to obtain legally required age-verification records for individuals appearing on his content, including any minors depicted, referenced, or reposted during his campaigns of online harassment?

With his history of posting explicit material of others, his admitted use of OnlyFans, and prior allegations of doxxing, cyberstalking, and AI-assisted harassment, the public has every right to demand clarity. His silence on the courthouse steps spoke louder than words.

This story is not going away. And until Noshirvan produces the legally required 2257/2257A documentation, questions about possible child-exploitation violations will only grow louder.

Loading comments...