Presentation of Dr. David Mantik on JFK 'Three Headshot Scenario' Followed by Doug Horne Re Same

Summary of "Presentation of Dr. David Mantik on JFK 'Three Headshot Scenario' Followed by Doug Horne Re Same:

This document provides a timestamped summary of the key points from the presentations by Dr. David Mantik and Doug Horne on the "Three Headshot Scenario" concerning the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Dr. David Mantik's Presentation Summary (00:00:01 - 00:01:13)

• [00:00:01,560] The presentation will discuss the three successful headshots scenario, which Dr. Mantik views as the standard model to explain what happened to JFK.

• [00:00:08,942] The "three successful headshots" model was first proposed by Doug Horne a decade prior.

• [00:00:28,880] The first shot is accepted as a bullet entry near the GOP (likely referring to the posterior scalp/occipital area), consistent with the initial statements of Dr. Humes and his colleagues.

• [00:00:45,547] The fragment trail seen in the X-rays must be due to a bullet entering at a different location, indicated by a "red arrow" (visually shown in the presentation, but described as a separate entry point).

• [00:00:57,507] The third shot is identified as a temporal bone entry, which is distinct from the other two.

• [00:01:00,184] The temporal bone entry likely caused the blood found at the back of the hip.

• [00:01:09,182] Dr. Mantik directs the audience to his ebook for a detailed table and further information on the topic.

Transition Point

[00:01:14,841] Dr. Mantik's presentation ends, and Doug Horne's presentation begins.

Doug Horne's Presentation Summary (00:01:14 - 00:06:38)

• [00:01:14,841] Doug Horne and Dr. Mantik agree that President Kennedy was shot in the head three times: once from behind and twice from the right front.

• [00:01:27,471] The shot from behind entered low in his skull and was traveling almost horizontally, suggesting it probably came from the Dal-Tex building.

• [00:01:40,667] One of the two shots from the right front entered high above the right eye, at the hairline.

• [00:01:46,181] Horne concludes this shot probably exited the upper left rear of the skull, based on the autopsy photograph.

• [00:01:57,483] The second shot from the right front entered just forward of and just above the right ear (temporal bone area).

• [00:02:06,713] This second shot from the right front caused the large blowout scene at the rear of his head.

• [00:02:21,966] This wound was almost a tangential wound, an opinion shared by Dr. Kemp Clark, the head of neurosurgery at Parkland Hospital.

• [00:02:49,281] Horne presents a schematic of the three entry points for the audience to examine.

• [00:04:03,289] The shot from behind (low in the rear of the skull) probably did not exit.

• [00:04:12,551] The non-exiting rear shot explains the cracked orbit of the right eye, displaced right eye, and crushed vomer (bone in the middle of the nose), as noted in Dr. Boswell's notes.

• [00:04:31,957] This bullet likely stayed in the body and was probably removed during surgery prior to the autopsy.

• [00:04:42,788] The shot from the immediate right front (causing the blowout) came from near the corner of the stockade fence on the Grassy Knoll.

• [00:04:52,091] The shot that entered high above the right eye came from much farther down the fence line (near the overpass).

• [00:05:04,208] The entrance wound high above the right eye had to be excised during the postmortem surgery, resulting in the large red V-shaped incision seen in the autopsy photos.

• [00:05:16,471] Horne emphasizes that no one at Parkland Hospital saw the bright red triangle/bloody damage above the president's right eye.

• [00:05:32,124] Jackie Kennedy testified to the Warren Commission that "From the front there was nothing."

• [00:06:24,761] Horne concludes that the bright red triangle in the autopsy photographs is an incision made to remove the third entrance wound (the dime-sized wound in the hairline).
____________________________
Original Source Attribution:

'JFK’s Head Wounds' | The Future of Freedom Foundation | Apr 27, 2021 | https://youtu.be/NfIDau5PP18?si=OV3KR5gTmjNdNWkC

This talk by Dr. David Mantik is part of the online conference The National-Security State and the Kennedy Administration.

Imagine: The dilemma for the autopsy pathologists on 11-22-63
Their Solution:

“Improving” the autopsy photographs and X-rays
Writing a misleading autopsy report (multiple times)
Elusive consistency on the posterior skull entry site
Pretending not to know about the throat wound
Including “eyewitness” statements in the autopsy report
Also: They did not see the Harper Fragment

The Autopsy Radiologist: John Ebersole—my recorded interview (now at NARA)

The Radiology Technologist: Jerrol Custer

Subsequent Government Radiologists:
How they misled us
What they missed

The Harper Fragment: 15 Clues for its Occipital Origin
These are all consistent with a frontal shot.
------------------------------
'Altered History: Exposing Deceit and Deception in the JFK Assassination Medical Evidence' | The Future of Freedom Foundation | Sep 18, 2014 | https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZR0GejpbM8EKI0q_wd9Spclygtkf749H&si=yaXg-tHMcEMqpY-4

In this 5-part video, Douglas P. Horne, who served on the staff of the Assassination Records Review Board and who is the author of the five-volume book Inside the Assassination Records Review Board: The U.S. Government’s Final Attempt to Reconcile the Conflicting Medical Evidence in the Assassination of JFK, discusses deceit and deception in the official autopsy of John F. Kennedy. See FFF president Jacob Hornberger’s article “Altered History: The FFF Video Project on the Autopsy of John F. Kennedy,” which introduces the launch of this video and two related e-books (99 cents each): JFK’s War with the National-Security Establishment: Why Kennedy Was Assassinated by Douglas P. Horne andThe Kennedy Autopsy by Jacob G. Hornberger
___________________________
*** COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER: This video and channel content are for educational purposes and use copyrighted material (clips) under the Fair Use Doctrine (Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107). This channel IS NOT MONETIZED, and all content is used for commentary, criticism, news reporting, or educational purposes, and falls within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement is intended. All rights to the original content belong to the respective copyright holders. If you wish to have your content removed, please email us through your channel's email address, or contact me directly at [email protected]. ***