TRUMP’S NETANYAHU Shift Sets Off a Legal MELTDOWN

Right, so Donald Trump has always seemed to treat the law as something of a minor inconvenience to him and so in line with that way of thinking, he has decided that after everything Benjamin Netanyahu has done — the mass killing in Gaza, the starvation documented by aid agencies, the three active corruption indictments, the ICC warrant for starvation and murder — the real problem is the Israeli legal system daring to keep his trial running. He put that in writing. A formal letter to Israel’s President Isaac Herzog, demanding a full pardon. Political case. Unjustified prosecution. Netanyahu leading Israel into peace. The language is his. The request is real. Herzog’s answer is on the record as well. A pardon needs a formal application. Netanyahu hasn’t filed one. Netanyahu won’t admit his guilt. Likud’s nineteen ministers still lined up behind him and called the charges trivial, all have backed Trump’s demand as well, because the law isn’t for them, its for everyone else apparently. None of it touches the ICC case though. None of it touches Netanyahu’s record of genocide or his corruption allegations themselves either. And Trump is pushing the line that the obstacle to lasting peace in Gaza, is Netanyahu’s legal bothers at home.
Right, so the letter arrived with the weight of the United States behind it. It carried the presidential seal. It carried the voice of Donald Trump. It was addressed to Isaac Herzog. It asked for a full pardon for Benjamin Netanyahu. There was no ambiguity in the wording. There was no diplomatic softening. Trump told Herzog that Netanyahu was guiding Israel into a time of peace. He told him the prosecution was political. He told him the trial was unjustified. He told him Netanyahu must not be diverted by legal proceedings. The letter was released by Herzog’s office and it entered the news cycle as a result, Herzog seemingly deciding that the world should actually see what the US President is trying to pull. The letter hit in the middle of a Gaza ceasefire that hadn’t stopped the funerals. Children still starving. Aid agencies still reporting hunger. The ICC warrant on Netanyahu already published. Three corruption indictments still sitting on the Israeli calendar. None of that paused. None of it moved. Trump still pushed his letter across Herzog’s desk and called it a case that shouldn’t exist. Public. Deliberate. Cameras already rolling. Nothing subtle about it. The law stayed where it was. The trial stayed open. The ceasefire stayed fragile. The paperwork kept piling up around Netanyahu and Trump still acted like one signature from Herzog could wipe five years of evidence. It didn’t move a thing. It just showed who was trying to move it. Herzog responded in the manner a president boxed in by procedure is required to respond. He thanked Trump for his support. He referred Trump back to the law. He stated that anyone seeking a presidential pardon must submit a formal request. He stated that the office would follow established legal procedures. Herzog did not promise a review, nor did he hint at cooperation, he did not open a political door here for Trump. He simply anchored himself to the legal process as it stands. He placed the responsibility for any next step on Netanyahu. Netanyahu had not requested a pardon. Netanyahu could not accept the terms of a pardon because the law does not let a president hand one out on command. A pardon in Israel only begins when the person who wants it files a written request. Not a hint. Not a signal. A formal application with their name on it. Without that document the presidency cannot move. The Justice Ministry has to receive it first. It has to open the file. It has to review the circumstances and send its recommendation forward. The presidency sits at the end of that chain, not the start. Most pardons only reach that stage after conviction, when the court has ruled and the sentence exists. The process normally includes an admission of guilt from the applicant before anything is signed. That is how the system protects itself from political interference. Netanyahu would have to request the pardon. He would have to accept the offence. Accept guilt. He’s done none of that. The indictments stay active. The evidence stays in the record. The trial stays open. The presidency stayed locked inside its legal boundaries. And Netanyahu’s silence remained the one fact the law cannot not move around, no matter how much Trump might shake his tiny orange fists at it. The indictments had been built over years. Case 1000 covered gifts from businessmen. Champagne. Cigars. Jewellery. Case 2000 covered conversations with a media mogul about manipulating coverage. Case 4000 carries the bribery charge. Regulatory favours for Bezeq Communications in exchange for favourable coverage. Hundreds of millions of shekels in benefits. These cases were not rumours. They were filed by the Attorney General all the way back in 2019 and Netanyahu has now been dodging this for 6 years. They were upheld by Israeli courts. The charges have survived several legal challenges. The trial had progressed through testimony. Former media executives had taken the stand. The court record is established fact itself now. Netanyahu faces three indictments. The police investigations had been public. The prosecutors had published their case summaries. Trump did not address those facts. Trump did not mention the evidence. Trump did not recognise the judicial independence of Israel, he’s too used to getting his own way in all things, a big, orange spoilt brat. He aimed his request at Herzog as if the presidency could wipe away five years of legal process, as if Trump could just skip to the end of the queue and the process could be done away with, because he demanded it be so.
And the Likud response arrived next. All nineteen ministers and deputy ministers signed a letter. They sent it to Herzog. They demanded that he pardon Netanyahu as well, emboldened as they were, as a party, clearly the law means nothing to them either. They said the prosecution harmed the unity of the people. They called the charges trivial. They said the cases were political. They argued that cigars and champagne were inconsequential. They argued that regulatory favours were defensible. They made the political case that the trials were an attack on the government itself. Their letter did not change the requirement for a formal request either. Their letter did not alter the need for an admission. Their letter did not affect the court record. It only created the impression of pressure. It attempted to frame the presidency as the obstacle. It attempted to frame the legal system as the problem. It attempted to frame Netanyahu as a victim. Him, a victim after what we’ve seen him order for the last two years in Gaza? It’s enough to make you physically sick.
Herzog moved in a different direction though. He met with Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara and reporting made clear that the attorney general’s position had not changed. The office would follow the law. The attorney general did not recommend intervention. Herzog also met relatives of former Gaza captives. One apparently suggested a pardon might give Netanyahu freedom to take political risks. Herzog listened. Herzog did not comment. Herzog did not indicate a shift. He simply gathered the views part of his office is expected to gather. The law stayed in place. The process stayed formal. The presidency remained tied to the framework that predated the war, predated the ceasefire, predated Trump’s request.
The ICC warrant sits under all of this like a weight nobody in power wants to mention. It was issued in November of last year. Starvation of civilians. Murder. Persecution. Crimes against humanity. The charges are public. The documents are still up. Israel tried to get the warrant thrown out. The judges rejected that back in July of this year. The warrant stayed in force. The obligations under the Rome Statute stayed in force. A domestic pardon in Israel can’t touch any of that. It won’t cancel an international arrest order. It won’t erase the accusations. It won’t stop an ICC member state from detaining him if he sets foot on their soil. Everyone involved knows that. Trump ignored it. Likud ignored it. They all behaved as if the corruption trial was the whole problem and the international case wasn’t sitting there unchanged, just because they choose not to recognise it.
Trump pushed his demand. Herzog pointed back at the law. Likud tried to add pressure. Netanyahu stayed silent. The attorney general held the line. The courts kept running. The ICC sat outside the entire performance, their arrest warrant still very much a factor regardless of what happens in Netanyahu’s corruption trial. The hostage families added their voices. Gaza stayed in the background of every sentence. The ceasefire stayed fragile. None of it shifted the legal machinery. Each event landed in order. Each contradiction built on the last. And the whole thing kept circling the one fact none of them could bend.
The first contradiction lay in Trump’s framing of Netanyahu as essential to peace. He described him as guiding Israel into a time of peace. The sentence implied that removing Netanyahu from office would jeopardise the ceasefire somehow, that this trial against the guy who had brought down and collapsed every previous ceasefire would collapse this one too. It implied that the prosecution was an obstacle to diplomacy. It implied that the legal system was interfering with foreign policy. None of that appeared in the reporting from Israeli institutions. None of that appeared in Herzog’s statement. Trump imported his narrative into a domestic legal crisis. He used the Gaza ceasefire as a lever. He used the language of peace to justify a legal intervention. The law did not respond to that rhetoric. The legal system responded only to the statutory requirements.
The second contradiction lay in Netanyahu’s position. He could not request a pardon without admitting guilt. Israeli pardons generally require an admission of guilt. They are usually granted post-conviction. Netanyahu denies all wrongdoing. He had denied wrongdoing since the investigations began. He had built his political identity around the claim of persecution, of it all being a witch-hunt. He had tied his survival to the claim of political targeting. He could not enter a process that required him to admit guilt. Trump asked Herzog to break procedure for someone who would never activate the process. Likud demanded Herzog override the law for someone who would never submit a request. The political pressure grew around an action that only Netanyahu could initiate and only Netanyahu would never take.
The third contradiction lay in the ICC warrant. The domestic trial could be ended through a pardon. The international case could not. Trump’s request did nothing to address the international criminal accusations. A domestic pardon for corruption would not affect the ICC’s charges. The starvation allegations would remain live. The murder and persecution counts would remain active. The warrant would remain issued. Netanyahu would remain internationally at risk. The idea that a domestic pardon would stabilise his position is just patently false. It remains false in every source. The Rome Statute obligations remained binding. Israel could act domestically, but it could never reach The Hague. Trump’s pressure ignored that reality. Likud’s pressure ignored it. They pretend it doesn’t exist because they don’t recognise it, but much of the rest of the world does. The international consequences stay outside their political structure.
The fourth contradiction lay in the political language. Likud called the charges trivial. They called the prosecution political. They called for unity. The regulatory favours in Case 4000 were in the hundreds of millions of shekels. The charges were not trivial. The indictments were not symbolic. The trial had admitted evidence. The judges had ruled on its admissibility. The political claims of triviality sat against a factual record that contradicted them. The political message targeted the public, not the law. The courtroom did not hear petitions calling the evidence trivial. The courtroom heard witnesses describing benefits granted to Bezeq. The courtroom heard testimony about editorial interference at Walla. The courtroom heard details about luxury gifts. The political language attempted to rewrite the scale. The legal system did not adopt that rewrite.
This story is less about the pardon and more about the nature of power in crisis. Trump’s letter used the authority of the presidency to pressure a foreign institution. Likud’s letter used the authority of the governing party to pressure the presidency. Netanyahu’s silence used the authority of his office to avoid triggering the conditions. Herzog used the authority of his role to maintain the boundaries. The attorney general used the authority of her office to uphold legal integrity. The ICC used its authority to maintain international accountability. The war in Gaza used its weight to shape the political landscape. The ceasefire created the timing. The pressure campaign exposed the machinery.
The timeline created its own rhythm. Trump’s letter arrived. The publications quoted it. Herzog responded. Likud escalated. Herzog consulted. The attorney general held the line. The ICC warrant remained unchanged. The Gaza ceasefire still holds for now, at least on paper if not in practice as Israel keep violating it. Netanyahu did not make a request. The system did not move. The political class continued to speak. The law continued to operate. Each sentence in the reporting built the picture. The pressure grew. The outcomes did not shift.
By the time the media cycle had processed the sequence, the contradiction had hardened into a simple reality. Trump had demanded something Israel could not legally provide. Likud had demanded something the presidency could not legally grant. Netanyahu refused to request the action they all claimed was essential. Herzog held the position that the law required. The attorney general stayed aligned with the court. The ICC remained separate. The ceasefire stayed fragile. The war crimes allegations remained open. The corruption case remained active. The Gaza context remained undeniable. The demand for unity remained political theatre. The demand for impunity remained the subtext.
These are the facts. Facts Trump does not acknowledge, or chooses to ignore. It cannot move beyond what the sources report. It cannot invent motive. It cannot create dialogue. It can only show the sequence. Trump demanded a pardon. Herzog explained the law. Likud joined the demand. Netanyahu stayed silent. The attorney general held the legal position. The ICC warrant continued to exist. The Gaza ceasefire framed the moment. The reporting documented each step. The law did not bend. The political class attempted to bend around it. The gap between demand and reality exposed the truth.
The truth was simple. The peace process did not hinge on the legal immunity of one man. The ceasefire did not depend on the cancellation of a trial. The presidency could not deliver what Trump demanded. The legal system could not provide what Likud wanted. The ICC could not erase the accusations. The state could not pretend the evidence did not exist. The timeline could not be rewritten. The narrative could not make impunity a diplomatic requirement. The reporting left no space for ambiguity. Every single source lines up.
The verdict lands where the facts sit. A peace deal that depends on the erasure of a criminal trial is not a peace deal. It is a demand for impunity. A presidency that refuses to break the law is not an obstruction. It is a line of defence. A governing party that calls evidence trivial is not defending unity. It is defending its leader. A foreign president demanding the dismantling of a legal process is not supporting peace. He is supporting a man. A domestic pardon cannot erase an international warrant. A courtroom cannot be replaced by political pressure. The ceasefire cannot be built on the denial of law. The final line remains as clear as the paperwork. The crisis is not the legal system. The crisis is the leadership trying to escape it. Netanyahu’s trial must stand, and by Israel’s own laws, it very much looks like it is going to.
The law is a convenience to these people, there for others, not to apply to themselves, not to serve the state, but to serve them and a classic example of this that has just come to light is that the state has decided that army radio is now too free with its opinions and language, the IDF shouldn’t be voicing their views, they should be just following orders and so Army Radio, the troop morale booster that has been in place since 1950, now has to go according to the deranged Defence Minister Israel Katz, so get the details of that assault on their own armed forces here.
Please do also hit like, share and subscribe if you haven’t done so already so as to ensure you don’t miss out on all new daily content as well as spreading the word and helping to support the channel at the same time which is very much appreciated, holding power to account for ordinary working class people and I will hopefully catch you on the next one. Cheers folks.