Complicit Participant Meghan Gatt of William Raveis Real Estate.

Below is the Public Notice and Judicial Notice with Affidavit for Complicit Participant Meghan Gatt of William Raveis Real Estate, REALTOR RACKETEER.

FROM THE DESK OF Andrew-Hamilton:Pritchard, Beneficiary in Equity-Executor
DOCKET NO. FST-CV15-6026844-S : SUPERIOR COURT
DOCKET NO. NWH-CV22-6006923-S
DOCKET NO. FST-CV23-5028567-S;
DOCKET NO. FST-CV23-5029576-S;
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. : J.D. STAMFORD/NORWALK
LD PROPERTIES LLC; LUTHY, THOMAS E.
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
S01S-CR22-0169490-T; S01S-CR23-0250191-S;
S01S-CR23-0251706-S; S01S-CR23-0251708-S;
S01S-CR23-0251790-S
V. : AT STAMFORD
PRITCHARD, ANDREW H., ET AL : NOVEMBER 12, 2025
PRITCHARD, BRIDGET R., ET AL

Notice to All Parties:

PUBLIC NOTICE & JUDICIAL NOTICE

Affidavit, a statement of truth:

I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris, Living American, Beneficiary in Equity-Executor of 9 Sylvester Court, Norwalk, Connecticut deliver testimony to identify and arrest pursuant to Connecticut General Statute (CGS) 54-170 Arrest without Warrant the complicit participant, Meghan Gatt, as to her role in the following claims and charges.

Meghan Gatt - The Coastal Collective of William Raveis Real Estate
Meghan Gatt - The Coastal Collective, Luxury Properties Specialist - Rowayton Office
159 Rowayton Avenue, Rowayton, CT 06853
Email: [email protected] | Cell: 203.904.8064 | Office: 203.655.1423 | Website: https://thecoastalcollective.raveis.com
“A top producer for more than 18 years with over $250 million in closed transactions, I bring experience, market knowledge and outstanding service to my clients. Creating a smooth process during the sales transaction is important for both buyers and sellers. I understand it's not just a house you're buying and selling it's your HOME and that makes it all the more personal.”

Please Note: William Raveis Real Estate broker Ted Sibilia is named as a complicit participant of the Racketeering. William Raveis Real Estate is a significant participant in Foreclosure Racketeering. Management is aware of this case and claims; and has left all affidavits uncontested.

Based on the listing of 9 Sylvester Court, Norwalk, Connecticut, Meghan Gatt listed it in May 2025. I phoned and emailed Ms. Gatt around that time to notify that I am the owner with proof of Federal Claims and more. I demanded she take the listing down. She did not.

On June 5, 2025, I filed in Case FST-CV15-6026844-S EXHIBIT Doc. #1127 which displays the $4.95mm Listing by Meghan Gatt.

Meghan Gatt as a real estate professional of 18 years must have skills to recognize red flags just off of pricing history, house bought in 2022 for $2mm lists $4.95mm in 2025.

Yet, even after contact by the owner she chose to continue with the listing with its big commission.

Attached are the following:

Meghan Gatt - The Coastal Collective Agent Profile - William Raveis
9 Sylvester Ct, Norwalk, CT 06855 Realtor Price History NO SALE Dec. 2021at $1255000 .5.19.2025
Gmail - Fwd_ FEDERAL CLAIM_ 9 Sylvester Court, Norwalk, Connecticut Meghan Gatt May 2025
Gmail - William Raveis Realtor Meghan Gatt_ 9 Sylvester Court, Norwalk, Connecticut 11.09.2025
Gmail - August 29, 2022, Connecticut, the ENEMY, RAID & SEIZURE of the Pritchards Video Links_ Megan Gatt and CT Realtors
Lucky 13 Federal Reserve Act 13-13 11.09.2025

Meghan Gatt willfully participates in the following:

CLAIMS, CHARGES:
LOSS OF AUTHORITY FOR JUDGES, STATE REFEREES, AND JUDGE TRIAL REFEREES due to WILLFUL VIOLATIONS of the Connecticut Practice Book Section 11-18; WILLFUL VIOLATIONS of the Administrative Procedures Act; WILLFUL VIOLATIONS of Title 18 U.S.C Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights; WILLFUL VIOLATIONS of Title 18 U.S.C Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; FRAUD UPON THE COURT by FALSE REPRESENTATION of court record by signing ORDER as JUDGE when you are not a Judge; WILLFUL VIOLATION of Civil Procedure as to establishing a Trial by Jury due to the many obvious legal issues raised; WILLFUL VIOLATIONS of CGS 52-434 State Referee which requires “Written Consent” by both parties; FRAUD UPON THE COURT by False Representation with the statement “JUDGE” on ORDERS throughout Court Records which on the face of it is a FALSE STATEMENT; Complicit Judge Trial Referee without “Written consent” is a Complicit Participant in the massive Racketeering network to enable the “Fraud & Swindle”, “Railroading”, “Racketeering”, “Seizure” and “Treason” by “War against the Constitution” and by obvious violations of the Administrative Procedures Act of 1946.
NO STANDING AND NO SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION with obvious NO DUE PROCESS as confirmed by the following violations TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT; CONNECTICUT GENERAL STATUTES CHAPTER 952 Section 53a-119 Larceny; CGA SEC. 53a-121 Value of Property; CGA SEC. 42a-9-109(a)(3); CGA SEC. 42a-9-203(b);CGA SEC. 42a-9-607(b) 12 CFR 1026 Truth in Lending Act (TILA) Regulation Z, 12 USC 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) Section 6; CGS Sec. 53- 379(a) Residential Mortgage Fraud; CGS 47-30 Ejectment. Set-Off of Defendant's Improvements; CGS Sec. 52-434 State Referees; CGS Sec. 53a-138 Forgery in the First Degree; CGS Sec. 53a-139 Forgery in the Second degree; CGS Sec. 53a-142a Filing a False Record; CGS Sec. 8- 265ee Notice to Mortgagee of Foreclosure; CGS Sec. 49-8a Penalty for Recording False Information; CGS Sec. 49-10 Assignment of Mortgage Debt-Requirements­ Sufficient Notice of Assignment; CGS Sec. 47-36aa Validations re Conveyancing Defects of Instruments Recorded after January 1, 1997, Insubstantial Defects-Defects re Power of Attorney-Defects re Conveyance by Fiduciary; CGS Sec. 47-5 Requirements re Conveyance of Land-Conveyance pursuant to Power of Attorney; CGS Sec. 53a-129a. Identity theft defined; CGS Sec. 53a-129b. Identity theft in the first degree: Class B felony; CGS Sec. 53a-129c. Identity theft in the second degree: Class C felony; CGS Sec. 53a-129d. Identity theft in the third degree: Class D felony; CGS Sec. 53a-129e. Trafficking in personal identifying information: Class D felony; CGS Sec. 52-571h. Action for damages resulting from identity theft; CGS 53a-130 Criminal Impersonation; CGS Sec. 53a-157b. (Formerly Sec. 53a-157). False statement: Class A misdemeanor; CGS Sec. 54-64a. Release by judicial authority; CGS Sec. 53a-180. Falsely reporting an incident in the first degree: Class D or C felony; CGS Sec. 53a-180b. Falsely reporting an incident concerning serious physical injury or death: Class D or C felony; CGS Sec. 53a-183. Harassment in the second degree: Class C misdemeanor; CGS 54-82m Speedy Trial; CGS Sec. 7-254. Delinquent assessments. Liens. Assignment of liens; CGS Sec. 52-215. Dockets. Jury cases. Court cases; CGS Sec. 52-218 Jury May Try Facts in Equitable Action; the Connecticut Corrupt Organizations and Racketeering Activity Act (CORA) CGS 53-393 et seq.; no DUE PROCESS as per the Constitution of Connecticut, the 5th Amendment, the 7th Amendment and 14th Amendment of the US Constitution; plus, The Right to Privacy' addressed in the 1st Amendment, 3rd Amendment, 4th Amendment, 5th Amendment and the "Liberty" Guarantee of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution; 18 US Code 4 Misprision of felony; 18 U.S. Code § 3 - Accessory after the fact; Title 18 US Code 153 Embezzlement Against Estate; Title 18 U.S.C Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights; Title 18 U.S.C Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; Title 42 US Code 122203 Prohibition Against Retaliation and Coercion; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees; Title 9 18 U.S.C 1951 Hobbs Act; Title 5 Administrative Procedure Act 1946; Executive Order 13818 Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption; Executive Order 13848 Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election; Title 50 U.S. Code 2204 Definitions “ENEMY”, “SPOILS OF WAR”, etc.; Title 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1918 - Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the Government; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1346 - Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”; Title 8 U.S. Code § 1481 - Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions; Title 22 U.S. Code § 611 – Definitions; Title 28 U.S. Code Chapter 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE; Title 22 U.S. Code § 286 - Acceptance of membership by United States in International Monetary Fund; Title 15 U.S. Code § 1122 - Liability of United States and States, and instrumentalities and officials thereof; Title 42 U.S. Code § 12202 - State immunity; Title 42 U.S. Code § 2000d–7 - Civil rights remedies equalization; Title 5 U.S. Code § 558 - Imposition of sanctions; determination of applications for licenses; suspension, revocation, and expiration of licenses; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2331 – Definitions “Domestic Terrorism”; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2332b - Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries; Title 18 U.S. Code § 175 - Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide; Title 18 U.S. Code 2441 War Crimes; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason; and CGS 54-170 Arrest without warrant.
The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice", Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954).
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966) "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them."

OBVIOUS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS

1. NO JURISDICTION
2. NO JURISDICTION FOR REMOTE HEARINGS
3. NO TRIAL BY JURY
4. GROTESQUE JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT
5. FRAUD
6. FRAUD UPON THE COURT
7. UN-CONSTITUTIONAL CONNECTICUT PRACTICE BOOK, NO DUE PROCESS AND VIOLATES THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT
8. UN-CONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH, NO GRAND JURIES VIOLATES FIFTH AMENDMENT
9. WILLFUL VIOLATIONS OF OATH AND DUTY
10. WILLFUL VIOLATIONS OF FIDUCIARY DUTY
11. SEIZURE OF PRIVATE PROPERTY
12. FALSE ARREST, KIDNAPPING AND ASSAULT
13. USE OF POLICE IN MILITARY ASSAULT IN CIVIL MATTER
14. USE OF MILITARY GRADE WEAPONS AGAINST AMERICAN PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS
15. MISPRISION OF FELONY
16. MISPRISION OF TREASON
17. IRREPARABLE HARM
18. RACKETEERING
19. ENEMY (DOMESTIC)
20. ACTS OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM

IMMEDIATE ACTIONS REQUIRED

1) ARREST COMPLICIT PERSONS.

Sec. 54-170. Arrest without warrant. The arrest of a person may be lawfully made also by any peace officer or a private person, without a warrant, upon reasonable information that the accused stands charged in the courts of a state with a crime punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, but when so arrested the accused shall be taken before such a judge with all practicable speed and complaint shall be made against him under oath setting forth the ground for the arrest as in section 54-169; and thereafter his answer shall be heard as if he had been arrested on a warrant.

2) Complicit participants must be brought before a unbiased Grand Jury of the People (not an Investigatory Grand Jury made up of one or three biased Judges) to determine that a Trial by Jury must commence for crimes and Treason.

3) Pay Restitution Claim to the Pritchard Family and the “People of Connecticut” $761,373,066 calculated as of May 22, 2024.

CASE LAW:

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, (1803)

"The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law."

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JARKESY, JR., 603 U. S. (June 27, 2024)
“I write separately to highlight that other constitutional provisions reinforce the correctness of the Court’s course. The Seventh Amendment’s jury-trial right does not work alone. It operates together with Article III and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to limit how the government may go about depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to trial by jury. Article III entitles individuals to an independent judge who will preside over that trial. And due process promises any trial will be held in accord with time-honored principles. Taken together, all three provisions vindicate the Constitution’s promise of a “fair trial in a fair tribunal.” In re Murchison, 349 U. S. 133, 136 (1955).”
That is why the Constitution built “high walls and clear distinctions” to safeguard individual liberty. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U. S. 211, 239 (1995). Ones that ensure even the least popular among us has an independent judge and a jury of his peers resolve his case under procedures designed to ensure a fair trial in a fair forum. In reaffirming all this today, the Court hardly leaves the SEC without ample powers and recourse. The agency is free to pursue all of its charges against Mr. Jarkesy. And it is free to pursue them exactly as it had always done until 2010: In a court, before a judge, and with a jury. With these observations, I am pleased to concur.

Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC, 143 S. Ct. 890 (2023) Nos. 21-86 and 21-1239 (April 14, 2023),

"Cases involving ... deprivations or transfers of life, liberty, or property constitute a core of cases that ... MUST be resolved by Article III courts—not executive adjudicators dressed up as courts".

Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
"The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better."

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Legal Maxim: “A claim not contested, stands true.”
Legal Maxim: “A claim bought in law that is not contested or rebutted, then stands true. Hence silence to a controversy is considered consent to any judgment.”
Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”
Legal Maxim: "An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in law."
If the government or any party fails to respond to an affidavit; then, the Affidavit is considered the binding truth between the parties involved.
See Sampson v. Channell, 110 F.2d 754, 762 (1st Cir. 1940): This case reiterates that an affidavit stands as truth unless specifically rebutted. The government, like any other party, is bound to respond to an affidavit in a timely and substantive manner. Ignoring it does not extinguish its validity; instead, it acknowledges the claims as true.
“Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . . We cannot condone this shocking behavior by the IRS. Our revenue system is based on the good faith of the taxpayer and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from the 1 government in its enforcement and collection activities.” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299. See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032; Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932

Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974)
Note: By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
Jurisdiction:
By the grace of God almighty, and through the supremacy clause of the Constitution (Article VI Clause 2 & 3) and the below-listed treaties of supreme law, it is I alone, who shall determine my status, standing, honor and jurisdiction.
I hereby invoke and stand upon all my natural rights, given by my God, which are written in the documents listed below. These, and all others, are universally known as the supreme law of the land:
• The Holy Bible, KJV 1611 GOD's Laws are Superior Law
• 1215 Magna Charta
• 1606 The First Charter of Virginia
• 1620 Mayflower Compact
• 1628 Petition of Rights
• 1639 Fundamental Orders of 1639
• 1641 Grand Remonstrance
• 1689 English bill of rights
• 1765 The Declaration of rights in congress at New York
• 1774 The Declaration of rights in congress at Philadelphia
• 1775 The Declaration of Arms
• 1776 The Virginia Declaration of rights
• 1777 the Articles of Confederation
• 1783 Treaty of Peace
• 1787 Northwest Ordinance
• 1789 The Constitution for the United States of America
• 1791 The Bill of Rights
• 1864, 1929 and 1949 The Geneva Conventions
• 1948 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
• 23 March 1976 The International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, Articles 1-27
I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, hereby and forever stand firm upon these natural rights listed above, giving the free man of God, one of "We the People".
The Supreme Court said that the "rights of life and personal liberty are the natural rights of man. To secure these rights ... governments are instituted among men" U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 2 Otto 542, 23 L. Ed. 588.
“Every State law must conform in the first place to the Constitution of the United States, and then to the subordinate constitutions of the particular state; and if it infringes upon the provisions of either, it is so far void." Houston v. Moore, 18 US 1, 5 L.Ed 19 (1840)
The constitution is the law of the land and there can be no statutes or rule making that would abrogate the constitution. The general principal is: anything that is repugnant to or abrogates the constitution is null and void of law.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966) "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them."
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, (1803) "The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law."
"An officer of the court may be held liable in damages to any person injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties connected with his office...The liability for nonfeasance, misfeasance, and for malfeasance in office is in his 'Individual Capacity' , not his official capacity..." see 70 Am. Jur. 2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil Liability "When lawsuits are brought against federal officials, they must be brought against them in their "individual" capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the shield of immunity." Williamson v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 815 F.2d. 369, ACLU Foundation v. Barr, 952 F.2d. 457,293 U.S. App. DC 101, (CA DC 1991). The same rule applies to state officials.
Summary:

Currently, our seized home of 30+ years is illegally listed for sale at $4,495,000. Please note: the fraudulent claim was for $200,000 approx.; the seizure happened on August 29, 2022; the fictious note had matured in 2018; and we have received nothing. Thus, one family was destroyed and at a minimum $4,295,000 was seized by traitors.

In the year 2000, Sheriffs were eliminated from the Connecticut Constitution and their power was abdicated, relinquished, returned to us, the people.
My authority as a living-breathing American Man, one of “We the People”, the Owners of Our Government, I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris, have the authority to address any felony that I witness firsthand (CGS 54-170 Arrest without Warrant).
Freedom requires justice.
Unlimited Power always corrupts.
Sui Juris Defendant, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, has filed multiple Writs of Habeas Corpus to arrest and charge complicit Judges, the Governor, the Attorney General and many complicit participants of the Government and the Public. All have been served.
Please note that Public Records such as Tax Records, Judicial Case Dockets, Impersonating State Marshals, Fraudulent Affidavits, Fraudulent Warrants, Excessive Force with Military Grade Weapons, and planned Assaults are used against Andrew Hamilton Pritchard and American Private Individuals.
I pray the State of Connecticut can find its way back to the foundation set by Reverand Hooker with the Fundamental Orders of 1639 which many historians believe to be a key component of the U.S. Constitution, “the Supreme Law of the Land”.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Respectfully,

Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris
Living American
Beneficiary in Equity-Executor
9 Sylvester Court
Norwalk, Connecticut
Phone: (203)858-7949
Email: [email protected]

August 29, 2022, Connecticut, the ENEMY, RAID & SEIZURE of the Pritchards Video Links:
70 Cops - Criminal Siege In Norwalk CT - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U1tH_tg5Mk
Police Assault An 80 Year Old. The Pritchard Family Matriarch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ey-f0i1tss
An arborist going to work is taken down by ten Norwalk Cops. Tackled him. Leaving a property. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3tHJdxG_Ls
Norwalk N@z!$ - "Just Following Orders" Illegal Seizure Of Property. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSJYxp6MotQ

Railroaded, Racketeering, Seizure & Treason, New Complicit Participants!
https://rumble.com/v2gaaia-railroaded-racketeering-seizure-and-treason-new-complicit-participants.html
Andy's $3.4mm home of 28+ years was seized by the Racketeering Judges (TREASON) and the "Straw Man Buyer" LD Properties, LLC; and sold today for $2mm to New Complicit Participants.
Fraudulent Claim for $200,000 approx. which was extinguished in 2018.
No liens have been satisfied.
No Disposition in the case.
There is no HUD closing by the "Straw Man Buyer" LD Properties LLC (aka. Le Ong, David Ong, David Vichea, David Chen).
There are no funds that were ever transferred.
Complicit Judge accepts a check that has nothing behind it.
Fiduciary?
Foreclosure is one of the biggest crimes in the World.