13 days ago

“FRAUD & SWINDLE”, “RAILROADED”, “RACKETEERING”, “SEIZURE” AND “TREASON”
TRUTH 1: Constitutional Oath and Duty mean nothing to “ENEMY” Judges and Lawyers.
Canon 3228
Public Service
2. The Presumption of Public Service is that all the members of the Private Bar Guild who have all sworn a solemn secret absolute oath to their Guild then act as public agents of the Government, or public officials by making additional oaths of public office that openly and deliberately contradict their private superior oaths to their own Guild.

TRUTH 2: The Complicit Attorneys Oath and Duty is to the “ENEMY” court
Corpus Juris Secundum (C.J.S.) legal encyclopedia, volume 7, section 4
§ 4 ATTORNEY & CLIENT 7 C.J.S.
“His first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the clients, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.”

Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 63,64 (1997)
Conspiracy "A conspiracy may exist even if a conspirator does not agree to commit or facilitate each and every part of the substantive offense."
It is "the common-law principle that, so long as they share a common purpose, conspirators are liable for the acts of their co-conspirators."

CONNECTICUT “RACKETEERING” IN THE OPEN.
Chief Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court, Chase Rogers (Ret. 2018), established the Bench Bar Foreclosure Committee in October 2007 which enabled "Racketeering" and "Railroading" with no restraints, rogue power.

“REASON WHY SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CHASE ROGERS SHOULD NOT BE
REAPPOINTED TO THE BENCH” by Vivian Winslow Thumser
Vivian Winslow Thumser gives a breakdown of how the corrupt Foreclosure Courts operate as a Connecticut Corrupt Organization & Racketeering Act (CORA) enterprise (the Hobbs Act, the Administrative Procedures Act).
The structure was created and developed by Chief Justice Chase Rogers (Ret. 2018) and continues today with most of the same complicit participants.
The following is Vivian Winslow Thumser's statement with links provided:

1. On October 23, 2007 Chief Justice Rogers issued a press release that she was creating a Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee. http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/news/press250.htm

EXTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION
231 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, Connecticut 06106
(860) 757-2270, Fax (860) 757-2215

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 23, 2007
Quick Links

Chief Justice Rogers Appoints Bench-Bar Foreclosure Committee

Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers announced today that she has appointed a Bench-Bar Foreclosure Committee that will review current practices and practices in the courts regarding foreclosure cases, and make recommendations on ways to improve those procedures and practices.

The Honorable Douglas C. Mintz, Administrative Judge for the Danbury Judicial District, will chair the committee. "The purpose of the committee is to promote cooperation between the bench and the bar in this sensitive area," Judge Mintz said.

'The number of foreclosure cases added in court during the 2005-06 fiscal year totaled 11,764. That number increased to 15,773 for the 2006-07 fiscal year," Chief Justice Rogers said. "Whether this is a trend that will continue remains to be seen, but I believe that our state courts must be as well prepared as possible to process these cases."

The first meeting of the committee will be Thursday, Oct. 25, 2007, at 2 p.m. in the Attorney Conference Room, located in the Supreme Court Building, 231 Capitol Ave, Hartford. The meeting is open to the public.

Committee members include judges, attorneys and Judicial Branch employees. Other members include: Judge Salvatore C. Agati; Attorney Ronald M. Bender; Attorney Adam L. Bendett; Attorney Jessica L. Braus; Attorney Denis R. Caron; Attorney Robert F. Frankel; Judge Samuel Freed; Attorney Peggy George; Judge Robert G. Gilligan; Judge Arthur A. Hiller, who is chief administrative judge of civil matters; Ms. Catherine Lapolla; Attorney Leanne M. Larson; Attorney Richard M. Leibert; Attorney Geoffrey Kent Milne; Judge Patty Jenkins Pittman; Judge Richard A. Robinson; Danbury Chief Clerk Therese Servas; Judge Theodore R. Tyma; Attorney Thomas W. Witherspoon; and Attorney Louis C. Zowine.

For further information, please contact Rhonda Stearley-Hebert, manager of communications, at 860-757- 2270.
2. The purpose of the Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee as stated in the press release was to "review current practices and practices in the courts regarding foreclosure cases, and make recommendations on ways to improve those procedures and practices."
3. In order to carry out this mission Justice Rogers handpicked members including Judges who presided over foreclosure cases and attorneys who prosecuted foreclosure cases.
4. On the list of handpicked attorneys were the owners and partners of the two largest foreclosure mill law firms Hunt Leibert Jacobson PC and Reiner Reiner and Bendett
PC1: Attorney Richard Leibert, Attorney Geoffrey Milne and Attorney Adam Bendett.
5. At the time Justice Rogers chose these attorneys and during their continued tenure on the Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee, the attorney firms have been charged, investigated and settled for running illegal kickback schemes, inducement schemes, double billing schemes and other fraudulent activities.
6. For instance, at the time Adam Bendett was chosen to sit amongst the Judges armed with the Constitutional Power of deciding foreclosure cases in this State, Reiner, Reiner and Bendett PC was charged, investigated and would eventually settled on December 10, 2007 with the Office of the Attorney General, the Insurance Commissioner and the Department of Consumer Protection of the State of Connecticut for running "Illegal kickback and Inducement Schemes."
See link: http://www.ct.gov/cid/lib/cid/Reinerkickbacksettlement.pdf

CHAPTER 4*
OATHS
*Cited. 176 C. 17; 180 C. 345.
It must be presumed that where the legislature prescribes that an acknowledgment be under oath, the oath should be administered in accordance with the provisions of chapter. 40 CS 151.
Table of Contents
Sec. 1-22. Ceremony.
Sec. 1-23. When affirmation may be used.
Sec. 1-24. Who may administer oaths.
Sec. 1-24a. Affiant may swear truth of document or other writing before proper officer, when.
Sec. 1-25. Forms of oaths.

Sec. 1-25. Forms of oaths. The forms of oaths shall be as follows, to wit:

FOR MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, EXECUTIVE
AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS.
You do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that you will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the state of Connecticut, so long as you continue a citizen thereof; and that you will faithfully discharge, according to law, the duties of the office of .... to the best of your abilities; so help you God.

FOR NOTARIES PUBLIC.
You do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that you will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the state of Connecticut; and that you will faithfully discharge, according to law, the duties of the office of notary public to the best of your abilities; so help you God.

FOR ELECTORS.
You solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that you will be true and faithful to the constitutions and governments of the State of Connecticut and the United States of America; that the statements made in your application for admission as an elector are true and complete; and that your privileges as an elector are not forfeited by reason of conviction of a felony; so help you God.

FOR ATTORNEYS.
You solemnly swear or solemnly and sincerely affirm, as the case may be, that you will do nothing dishonest, and will not knowingly allow anything dishonest to be done in court, and that you will inform the court of any dishonesty of which you have knowledge; that you will not knowingly maintain or assist in maintaining any cause of action that is false or unlawful; that you will not obstruct any cause of action for personal gain or malice; but that you will exercise the office of attorney, in any court in which you may practice, according to the best of your learning and judgment, faithfully, to both your client and the court; so help you God or upon penalty of perjury.

NO OATH TO THE CONSTITUTION BY LAWYERS!

WAR CRIMES - Title 18 U.S. Code § 2441
PUBLIC NOTICE & JUDICIAL NOTICE (10/14/2025):
All Officers, Agents, Clerks, Judges, Administrators, and Actors of the Corporations Doing Business as the STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE, and the GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES; plus, PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. have No Authority to Adjudicate, Govern or Legislate as they are “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION” and “ENGAGE IN ACTS OF TREASON”. They are the “ENEMY” of the American People executing “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” and “GENOCIDE” through “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” and use of “BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS”. This is “TREASON” as demonstrated by the obvious violations of their “OATH and DUTY”.
CHARGES & CLAIMS:
Title 18 U.S. Code 2441 War Crimes; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2331 – Definitions “Domestic Terrorism”; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2332b - Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries; Title 18 U.S. Code § 175 - Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason; and Title 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason by a weaponized the US Judicial Branch from top to bottom executing upon “We the People” of America through pirated power affirmed by “ENEMY” Courts. Plus, violation of the Justice for Victims of War Crimes Act & Geneva Conventions as affirmed by October 8, 2025, DECLARATION AND ORDER OF THE ALLIANCE OF INDIGENOUS NATIONS (AIN) INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL which states, “This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the 'COVID-19 nanoparticle injections' or 'mRNA nanoparticle injections' or 'COVID-19 injections meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction, according to the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, of 1989, 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023), Canada‘s Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention Implementation Act, 2004, and the International Biological Weapons Convention. This Tribunal finds and hereby declares that the COVID-19 injections, mRNA injections, or mRNA nanoparticle injections, are in fact biological and technological weapons of mass destruction.”
LEGAL MAXIM:
The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government.
AUTHORITY:
As a living-breathing American Man, one of “We the People”, the Owners of Our Government, I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris, have the authority to address any felony that I witness firsthand (CGS 54-170 Arrest without Warrant).
King James Version (KJV) Galatians 6:7
“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

The world is watching.

Loading comments...