The world is watching.

Puppets> Deep State/CIA> PayPal Mafia (Musk, Theil)> Palantir (“Warp Speed” Data Death & Control)

Trump/Vance/Uniparty are just chumps feeding the Evil Machine fear and death for $$$$.

Our 1777 Articles of Confederacy and Perpetual Union are the last Lawful documents produced in “the united states for America”. Hell, they even had a secret meeting and came up with the Constitution; then, Evil acted as if it was validated by all.

Evil keeps playing the same game all over the world.

Russia is a testament to the power and will of God. The horror thrust upon the Russian people by Evil men is hell just to think about. Yet, they have survived and now prosper in God’s light.

I know the Evil machine as I experienced 911 firsthand as partner at Cantor Fitzgerald. We lost 658 loved ones.

Search for October 8, 2025, DECLARATION AND ORDER OF THE ALLIANCE OF INDIGENOUS NATIONS (AIN) INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL and read it.

King James Version (KJV) Galatians 6:7 “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

September 18, 2025
Affidavit:
I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, the Sui Juris Petitioner, demands a default judgment be entered by a Clerk of the Court as the Writ of Capias – Demand for Arrest was delivered and received by Certified Mail on August 27, 2025, for John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, (in his individual capacity); Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, (in his individual capacity); Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, (in his individual capacity); Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice, (in her individual capacity); Elena Kagan, Associate Justice, (in her individual capacity); Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice, (in his individual capacity); Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice, (in his individual capacity); Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice, (in her individual capacity); Ketanji Brown Jackson, Associate Justice, (in her individual capacity); pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes 54-170 - Arrest without warrant. As of September 18, 2025, all above have failed to plead or otherwise defend (see attached Writ of Capias and proof of service).
The Complicit Judges and Clerks engage in “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” (Title 18 US Code 2384) as an “ENEMY” (Title 50 U.S. Code 2204) executing “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (Title 18 U.S. Code 2331) and TREASON (Title 18 U.S. Code 2381) against “the People” of America by weaponizing judicial authority from top to bottom for any objective and/or target.
Legal Maxim: “The main objective of government is the protection and preservation of personal property, private rights, public liberties and upholding the law of God.”
Legal Maxim: “A claim not contested, stands true.”
Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”
Legal Maxim: “Failure to enforce the law does not change it.”
Legal Maxim: “A claim bought in law that is not contested or rebutted, then stands true. Hence silence to a controversy is considered consent to any judgment.”
Legal Maxim: “An Unrebutted Affidavit is Truth.”
Legal Maxim: “No one is judge in their own case.”
Legal Maxim: “Judicial notice is a form of evidence.”
The United States Constitution requires Due Care in recognizing Legal Maxims.

I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, demand the charges below be executed by the proper Authority of “We the People”, and demand Restitution (Five Bills of Complaint) for “We the People”, “The 658 Cantor Fitzgerald Employees Killed in 9/11”, “We the People of Connecticut”, Samuel A. Magliari, Jr., Joseph Budner Elad, and Andrew Hamilton Pritchard in the amount of $34,624,085,677,545 as required. See Below.

CHARGES - CGS 54-170 Arrest without Warrant:
The Complicit Participants named above are in violation of the following: the US Constitution; Title 18 U.S.C Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; Title 5 Administrative Procedure Act 1946; Title 18 U.S. Code 1509. Obstruction of court orders; Title18 U.S. Code 2076 Clerk is to File; Title 18 U.S. Code 2071 : Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed; Title 50 U.S. Code 2204 Definitions “ENEMY”, “SPOILS OF WAR”, etc.; Title 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1346 - Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”; Title 15 U.S. Code § 1122 - Liability of United States and States, and instrumentalities and officials thereof; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2331 – Definitions “Domestic Terrorism”; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2332b - Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason.

Dates of the Supreme Court Habeas Corpus Petitions (stated Restitution):

September 13, 2024 – RE: Samuel A. Magliari, Jr., [Bill of Complaint -$1,767,881,784]

September 13, 2024 – RE: Andrew Hamilton Pritchard & “We the People of Connecticut”. [Bill of Complaint - $725,781,907,128]

November 13, 2024 – RE: Joseph B. Elad & “We the People of America” [Bill of Complaint - $140,000,000,000]

December 16, 2024 – RE: “We the People of America” and Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. [Bill of Complaint - $33,755,862,000,000]

July 31, 2025 – RE: “The 658 Cantor Fitzgerald Employees Killed in 9/11” and Partner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. [Bill of Complaint - $673,888,633]

Restitution Total: $34,624,085,677,545

Please Note: 1998 US Tobacco Settlement $206 Billion, Alex Jones $1.5 Billion (26 families).

Supreme Court Case Law:
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).
Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52,
Conspiracy "A conspiracy may exist even if a conspirator does not agree to commit or facilitate each and every part of the substantive offense." Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 63 (1997). It is "the common-law principle that, so long as they share a common purpose, conspirators are liable for the acts of their co-conspirators." Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 64 (1997). "A conspirator must intend to further an endeavor which, if completed, would satisfy all of the elements of a substantive criminal offense, but it suffices that he adopt the goal of furthering or facilitating the criminal endeavor."
In Brown v. Vasquez, 952 F.2d 1164, 1166 (9th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1778 (1992),
The court observed that the Supreme Court has "recognized the fact that '[t]he writ of habeas corpus is the fundamental instrument for safeguarding individual freedom against arbitrary and lawless state action.'"
Picking v. Pennsylvania Railway, 151 F.2d. 240, Third Circuit Court of Appeal.
“The plaintiff's civil rights pleading was 150 pages and described by a federal judge as "inept". Nevertheless, it was held "Where a plaintiff pleads pro se in a suit for protection of civil rights, the Court should endeavor to construe Plaintiff's Pleadings without regard to technicalities."
Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
"The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better."

Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390 - Supreme Court 1923
Take judicial notice of an adjudicated fact by the Supreme Court, that writ of habeas corpus--may be invoked if the petitioner is free from bodily restraint and thereby the court is prohibited from dismissing this petition on the grounds the petitioner is not a prisoner or jailed.
As to LIBERTY, “While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”
Wild v. Fregein Construction, 68 P.3rd 855 (2003).
To falsify information is indisputably fraud. “If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.., even if it is holding a piece of paper that says it is a chicken”
American Communications Assn. v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382 (U.S. Supreme Court - 1950)
It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error. Rights are a subset of property. property. Government exists to secure and protect rights, NOT to conspire against and trample them. The primary fiduciary duties of oath taker public servants are to protect and secure such rights.
United States v. Sandford, Fed. Case No.16, 221 (C.Ct.D.C. 1806).
In the early days of our Republic, "prosecutor" was simply anyone who voluntarily went before the grand Jury with a complaint.

The world is watching.