THE CASE TO EXPOSE COVID TYRANNY. DOES 1-2 V. HORCHUL IS GOING TO SCOTUS?

Plaintiffs could argue that both state and corporate defendants made employment or regulatory decisions based on false or incomplete information provided by vaccine manufacturers or federal agencies.
This opens the door to follow-on civil suits for damages under theories like:
Negligent misrepresentation / fraud on the agency (if manufacturers concealed material facts),
Civil conspiracy (if regulators and corporations knowingly enforced mandates despite contrary evidence), and
Section 1983 liability (if state actors knowingly deprived citizens of rights under color of law using fraudulent premises).
4. Discovery & Spoliation Opportunities
The new FOIA materials could justify motions to reopen discovery or motions for relief from judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2)** (“newly discovered evidence”)** if the petitioners can show that key factual assumptions — vaccine efficacy, risk profile, or agency transparency — were materially false or concealed at the time of the original case.