The ‘Dangerous Narco-Terrorists’ They Just Let Go.

It’s easy to feel lost in the daily storm of news headlines, where government policies often seem contradictory and confusing. One day an individual is labeled a grave threat to national security, and the next, they are quietly released. A trade war launched to protect American interests ends up with America bailing out everyone involved, including foreign nations.

Let’s cut through the noise to highlight a few of the most surprising and revealing recent events. These are not just isolated oddities; they expose a deeper truth about the nature of the systems that govern us. Let’s unpack four counter-intuitive takeaways that reveal how these systems truly operate.

Takeaway 1: The ‘Dangerous’ Narco-Terrorists They Simply Let Go
The U.S. government has a policy of extrajudicially killing suspected drug smugglers on the high seas off the coast of Venezuela. To justify this, it labels them “narco-terrorists,” a term that allows the Pentagon and CIA to bypass the constitutional requirements of arrest and trial. Under this post-9/11 rationale, suspects are treated as “illegal enemy combatants” who can be killed on sight.

In a recent incident, the military blew up a submersible believed to be carrying drugs, but their “worst nightmare” happened: there were two survivors. This created a dilemma. These individuals were deemed so dangerous they were targeted for summary execution. Yet, after being taken into custody, they were simply set free.

The absurdity deepens when you see where they went. One survivor was sent to Colombia, whose government said they would prosecute him. The other was sent to Ecuador, where officials announced they would not prosecute him. So much for neutralizing a grave threat. This action completely contradicts the government’s own justification for lethal force.

It shows you the whole sham of this thing it’s just a lie they keep repeating: that these are dangerous threats to national security.

This incident suggests the “war on narco-terrorists” is less about stopping dangerous criminals and more about posturing. After fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq, the military needs easy “battles” to win against defenseless boats to boost its ego and justify its massive budget. It’s a sham operation from top to bottom.