JUAN O SAVIN- THE VIOLATION OF THE LAW & RICO STATUTES - SpaceShot76 10 17 2025

2 days ago
26.1K

PART TWO Juan and Tracie spend the time to inform the Public of the Laws around RICO statutes that involve the Governance of UTAH. You find out that many of these corrupt "good ol' Boy" States are actually greasing the hands of a very corrupt enterprise. Often a "Crime Family" exists to protect the interests of People in a wider interest for the WILL OF THE PEOPLE. This was collusion to the highest degree. The truth of this had to be brought forward! And thanks to the Team in Utah that Juan O Savin personally assisted they have now written a case that might be a Class Action Lawsuit used in YOUR STATE.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-109-rico-charges
Elements of a RICO violation
Enterprise:
A discrete entity, such as a corporation, that is engaged in or affects interstate commerce.
Pattern of racketeering activity:
A pattern of at least two "predicate crimes" committed within a 10-year period.
Predicate crimes:
A wide range of crimes, including but not limited to:
Murder
Arson
Bribery
Drug trafficking
Mail fraud and wire fraud
Extortion
Here is the PDF for the Suit that was submitted 10 14 2025 https://utahcorruption.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/01-Complaint.pdf
The Corruption is DEEP and ILLEGAL.
Juan further explains this on an INTERNATIONAL BASIS.
Ukraine. Wire Fraud. Social Media malfeasance that is CRIMINAL.
Phil Lyman discovered this over a series of incidences that would
make anyone ill. These PEOPLE are SICK.
Full SpaceShot show here: https://rumble.com/v70fql2-utah-rico-juan-o-savin-tracie-halvorsen-101725-7pm.html
A more expansive view holds that in order to be found guilty of violating the RICO statute, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment.
Legal Minds take a look.. because other STATES can use this for LAWSUITS for their deeper look at fraud. You can figure that this may be necessary to get to the bottom of some STATE PROBLEMS in order to discover the PIRATES that have taken over the HELM OF THE SHIP OF STATE.

Loading 38 comments...