Most Horrifying Acts Islamic Caliphates Did To 1,400-Year True History Of The Islamic Slave Trade

The True History Most Horrifying Acts Islamic Caliphates Did To 1,400-Year Of The Islamic Slave Trade. Horrific True Realities Ten Of Millions Of White Women And Other Skin Colors Faced For Over 1400 Years In The True Islamic Caliphates Empire Raped Daily By Different Men And Yes Boys Too... You Maybe Also Sold As Sex Slaves, Female Genital Mutilation & You Will Wish For Death? Yes This Is Still Going On Today All Over The World Right Now In 2026. Islamic Death Cult? Islamic Men Raping Kids Of Both Sexes'? Truth About Honor Killings? Its Not About This Life You Live Today? Its About Death To The Whole World Today? Its All About Allah And The After Life Only?

Show more

So We See The Muslim Peoples Dark Future As A New Islamic State Of Death Of The World Today? The Islamic Caliphate, an institution established after the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632 AD-CE, spanned over 1,300 years as a political and religious entity governing the Muslim world. The Ottoman Empire existed from approximately 1299 to 1922. It was founded by Osman I around 1299 and officially dissolved after World War I, with the abolition of the sultanate on 1 November 1922.

Everything you learned about slavery in school is a fraction of the story. This documentary dives into the 1,400-year history of the Islamic slave trade a system of conquest that dwarfed the Atlantic trade in duration and scale. We uncover the evidence from Ottoman archives and medieval texts that has been systematically ignored and suppressed. From child levies that turned sons into soldiers against their own people, to the economic warfare that crushed civilizations, this is the history they don't want you to know.

There is the story of a boy, that was kidnapped as a child from an Albanian Christian family, was trained and raised by the Turks and became the greatest general of the Ottoman empire, they even named him Lord Alexander (after alexander the great) or Skanderbeg in Turkish. That boy, who became a great general, never forgot what happened to him, He escaped the Empire with his troops, returned to Albania, gathered all Albanian lords into a kingdom and fought against the Ottomans, holding them back from conquering Europe for 25 years. Even Mehmed the second who conquered Constantinople couldn't conquer Albania and defeat Skanderbeg. The Vatican, Rome and Venedic called him Protector of Europe and Christianism. His statues are found all over Europe. This is the story of Gjergj Kastrioti Skanderbeg . The greatest Albanian who ever lived, and one of the greatest generals the history has known.

What's the appeal of a caliphate?
In June the leader of Islamic State declared the creation of a caliphate stretching across parts of Syria and Iraq - Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi named himself the caliph or leader. Edward Stourton examines the historical parallels and asks what is a caliphate, and what is its appeal?

When Islamic State (IS) declared itself a caliphate in June this year, and its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi claimed the title of caliph, it seemed confirmation of the group's reputation for megalomania and atavistic fantasy. Al-Baghdadi insisted that pledging allegiance to this caliphate was a religious obligation on all Muslims - an appeal which was immediately greeted by a chorus of condemnation across the Middle East.

But is it dangerous to underestimate the appeal of IS? Al-Baghdadi's brutal regime does not, of course, remotely conform to the classical Muslim understanding of what a caliphate should be, but it does evoke an aspiration with a powerful and increasingly urgent resonance in the wider Muslim world.

The last caliphate - that of the Ottomans - was officially abolished 90 years ago this spring. Yet in a 2006 Gallup survey of Muslims living in Egypt, Morocco, Indonesia and Pakistan, two-thirds of respondents said they supported the goal of "unifying all Islamic countries" into a new caliphate.

Why do so many Muslims subscribe to this apparently unrealisable dream? The answer lies in the caliphate's history.

The Arabic khalifa means a representative or successor, and in the Koran it is linked to the idea of just government - Adam, and then David and Solomon, are each said to be God's khalifa on earth. And when the Prophet Mohammed died in 632 the title was bestowed on his successor as the leader of the Muslim community, the first of the Rashidun, the four so-called "Rightly Guided Caliphs" who ruled for the first three decades of the new Islamic era.

These four were, according to Reza Pankhurst, author of The Inevitable Caliphate, all appointed with popular consent. He argues that their era established an ideal of a caliph as "the choice of the people… appointed in order to be responsible to them, apply Islamic law and ensure it's executed". He adds that the true caliph "is not above the law".

Shia Muslims challenge this version of history - they believe that the first two caliphs effectively staged a coup to frustrate the leadership claims of the Prophet's cousin Ali - and this dispute about the early caliphate is the source of Islam's most enduring schism. But to today's Sunni Muslims, many of them living under autocratic regimes, the ideal of a caliphate built on the principle of government by consent is likely to have a powerful appeal.

Another significant source of the caliphate's appeal today is the memory it stirs of Muslim greatness. The era of the Rightly Guided Caliphs was followed by the imperial caliphates of the Umayyads and Abbasids.

"Seventy years after the Prophet's death, this Muslim world stretched from Spain and Morocco right the way to Central Asia and to the southern bits of Pakistan, so a huge empire that was all… under the control of a single Muslim leader," says historian Prof Hugh Kennedy. "And it's this Muslim unity, the extent of Muslim sovereignty, that people above all look back to."

This Islamic Golden Age was also marked by great intellectual and cultural creativity - the Abbasid court in Baghdad valued literature and music, and fostered world-changing advances in medicine, science and mathematics.

Yet these dynasties extended their rule so far, and so fast, that it became increasingly difficult for any one lineage to control all Muslim lands. As power fragmented, it was not just a political dilemma for any particular dynasty, but also a theological challenge to the very idea of the caliphate. The power of unity was closely linked to the idea of a caliph - yet it only took just over a century of the Muslim faith for the world to see parallel - and even competing - caliphates emerge.

The Sunni theologian Sheikh Ruzwan Mohammed argues: "While you do have two caliphs on earth proclaiming that they're the representatives of the Muslim community at this point, and more deeply that they are the shadow of God on earth, Muslims at that point were very pragmatic, and they acknowledged the fact that there could be more than one caliph representing the benefits and the concerns of the Muslim community - and that was also understood and accepted by Muslim theologians."

The Abbasid caliphate lasted for half a millennium before coming to a brutal end in 1258. When Baghdad fell to the Mongols, the last of the city's caliphs was rolled in a carpet and trampled to death under the hooves of Mongol horses - this was, bizarrely, a mark of respect, as the Mongols believed that people of rank should be killed without their blood being shed.

The institution of the caliphate, however, survived. Members of the Abbasid family were installed as titular caliphs in Cairo by the Mamluks, the main Sunni Islamic power of the day. They were more ornaments to the Mamluk court than anything else, but merely by existing they preserved the ideal of a single leader behind whom all Muslims could unite. So the title was still there for the taking when a new Islamic empire arose. Early in the 16th Century it passed - in slightly murky circumstances - to the Ottoman sultans, who ruled a new Islamic world power for a further 400 years.

The caliphate was finally extinguished by Kemal Ataturk, the father of modern Turkey, in 1924. He believed the abolition of the institution was essential to his campaign to turn what was left of the empire into a 20th Century secular nation state. The last Ottoman caliph was expelled from Istanbul to live out a life of cultured exile in Paris and on the Cote d'Azur.

But the institution he represented had by then existed for nearly 1300 years, and the impact of its abolition on Muslim intellectual life was profound. Salman Sayyid, who teaches at Leeds University and is the author of Recalling the Caliphate, compares it to Charles I's execution, which opened up so many profound questions about the roles of parliament and the crown. In the same way, he says, Muslim thinkers in the 1920s suddenly found they had to ask fundamental questions they had never confronted before: "Do Muslims need to live in an Islamic State? What should that state be like?"

By the mid 20th Century leaders like Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser had come up with an answer to those questions - the ideology known as pan-Arabism offered a kind of secular caliphate, and during the 1950s Nasser even established something called the United Arab Republic, which joined Egypt and Syria.

But everything changed in the Middle East with the foundation of the State of Israel, and Pankhurst argues that Pan-Arabism was wrecked on the rock of Israeli military might. "Pan Arabism drew its legitimacy from the fact that it was going to return the Arabs to their position of glory and liberate Palestine," he says. "When we had the abject defeat of 1967 (the Six Day War) it exposed a hollowness to the ideology."

Pankhurst belongs to Hizb ut Tahrir, an organisation founded in the 1950s to campaign for the restoration of the caliphate, and he argues that the revival of the idea has been driven by a general disenchantment with the political systems under which most Muslims have been living. "When people talk about a caliphate… they are talking about a leader who's accountable, about justice and accountability according to Islamic law," he says. "That stands in stark contrast to the motley crew of dictators, kings, and oppressive state-security type regimes you have, which have no popular legitimacy at all."

The regimes that dominated the Middle East during the late 20th Century did not like Hizb ut Tahrir - unsurprisingly, in view of its ideology. Pankhurst spent nearly four years in an Egyptian jail.

In the early days of the Arab Spring, the revolutions in countries like Tunisia, Egypt and Libya were interpreted in Western capitals as evidence that the Muslim future lay with democracy. Then in Egypt came the overthrow of the democratically-elected Muslim Brotherhood government by the army under General Abdel Fatah al-Sisi - and then came the horrors of Islamic State amid the bloody chaos of civil strife in Syria and Iraq.

"Many people will say that IS begins with al-Sisi's coup," says Salman Sayyid of Leeds University. "We right now have a growing gap of legitimacy in most governments that rule the Muslim peoples - and that gap isn't closing… One way of thinking about the caliphate is really a quest for Muslims to have autonomy. The idea that you should have capacity to write your own history becomes very strong and for Muslims I think the caliphate is the instrument for trying to write their own history."

Many classical Sunni scholars challenge the very notion that the caliphate is a political project. Sheikh Ruzwan Mohammed, for example, argues that the key to the caliphate is really spiritual. "I think the Islamic State should come from within," he says. "It should be an Islamic State first and foremost of mind and soul." And the overwhelming majority, even of those who do believe that a new caliphate is a realistic political objective, completely reject the violence espoused by the self-styled Islamic State.

But IS has skillfully exploited the elements in the caliphate's history which best serve its purposes. The historian Hugh Kennedy has pointed out, for example, that their black uniforms and flags deliberately echo the black robes the Abbasids adopted as their court dress in the 8th Century, thus recalling Islam's Golden Age. And their original title - the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant - harks back to the days when there was no national border between the two countries, because both territories were part of the great Islamic caliphate.

The success of IS does, in a grim way, reflect what a powerful and urgent aspiration the Caliphate has become. The IS project is certainly megalomaniac and atavistic, but it is building on an idea that is much more than a fantasy.

Introduction
The Islamic slave trade also known as the Arab slave trade, Trans-Saharan slave trade, or the East African slave trade represents one of the most enduring and underdiscussed systems of human bondage in world history. Spanning over 1,300 years, this network of slavery involved the trafficking of millions of Africans, Europeans, and Asiansacross the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, and parts of India. While the transatlantic slave tradehas been extensively studied and condemned, the Islamic slave trade remains comparatively obscure in popular discourse, despite being older, longer-lasting, and in some regions, more brutal.

This blog post seeks to uncover the real historyof the Islamic slave trade its origins, methods, religious justifications, demographics, and lasting legacy while confronting the silence that often surrounds it.

The Origins of the Islamic Slave Trade
The Islamic slave trade began during the 7th century, following the rise of Islamunder the Prophet Muhammad. Slavery was already prevalent in pre-Islamic Arabia, but Islam formalized and institutionalized the practice. The Qur’anand the Hadiths(sayings and actions of Muhammad) include numerous references to slaves, including guidance on how they should be treated, rules for manumission, and conditions under which slaves could be taken.

Islamic law, or Sharia, did not prohibit slavery; rather, it regulated it. Slavery was seen as a natural institution, particularly in the context of jihad holy war where non-Muslims captured in battle could be enslaved. This concept would fuel the enslavement of millions across centuries.

The Scope and Scale of the Islamic Slave Trade
Historians estimate that between 11 million and 18 millionpeople were enslaved through Islamic networks between the 7th and 20th centuries. Some scholars suggest the number could be even higher when accounting for undocumented cases.

Slaves were trafficked from:
Sub-Saharan Africathrough the Trans-Saharan slave trade
East Africavia the Indian Ocean slave trade
Europe, particularly from Slavic, Greek, and Caucasianregions
Central Asiaand even India

Unlike the transatlantic slave trade, which focused heavily on labor in the Americas, the Islamic slave trade had a broader spectrum of uses: domestic servitude, military conscription, concubinage, and eunuch service.

The African Toll: Slavery in the Islamic World
One of the most devastating aspects of the Islamic slave trade was its impact on Black Africans. Millions of men, women, and children were taken from the Sudan, Niger, Mali, Tanzania, Mozambique, and beyond.

The Zanj Rebellion
A major example of resistance was the Zanj Rebellion(869–883 AD), when thousands of East African slaves (Zanj) in present-day Iraqrevolted against their Arab masters. The rebellion lasted over 14 years and highlighted the brutalityand inhumanityof slave conditions in the Islamic world.

Castration and Eunuchs
One of the most brutal practices inflicted upon enslaved African boys was castration. In an effort to create eunuchs castrated males who could be trusted to serve in royal harems or as palace guards young boys were subjected to horrific mutilation. This was especially common in certain Islamic and Eastern societies, where eunuchs were considered more loyal and less threatening to the elite. The procedure was excruciating and perilous, often carried out without proper medical knowledge or hygiene. As a result, the mortality rate was shockingly high many boys did not survive the operation, succumbing to blood loss, infection, or trauma. For those who did survive, the physical and emotional scars lasted a lifetime.

Islamic Justifications for Slavery
The institution of slavery in Islamic civilization was not just culturally accepted it was religiously sanctioned. Several Qur’anic verses and Hadiths reference slaves:

Surah An-Nisa (4:24)permits sexual relations with "those whom your right hand possesses" (i.e., slave women).

Surah Al-Baqarah (2:178)allows for financial compensation or the freeing of a slave in the case of accidental murder.

Hadith Sahih Muslim 1665details Muhammad himself buying, selling, and owning slaves, including African slaves such as Bilal ibn Rabah.

While some modern Islamic scholars reinterpret these passages metaphorically or argue that Islam encouraged the manumission of slaves, the historical record overwhelmingly shows that slavery was normalizedin Islamic society for over a millennium.

Slave Markets of the Muslim World
Throughout the Islamic empire, slave marketswere prominent and bustling. In cities like: Zanzibar - Cairo - Baghdad - Istanbul - Mecca
Slaves and sex slaves were bought and sold in the open. European travelers from the Middle Ages through the 19th century often recorded shocking scenes of African men in chains, women displayed for sexual purposes, and children auctioned like livestock.

Women and Sexual Slavery
While the transatlantic slave trade primarily focused on men for labor, the Islamic slave trade disproportionately targeted women and girlsfor sexual slaveryand concubinage.

Many Muslim men owned harems collections of concubines acquired through conquest or purchase. These women were not wives and had no legal rights.
Their children, if born, could be freed but the women themselves often remained sexual propertyfor life.

This is particularly evident in the Ottoman Empire, where the Imperial Haremconsisted of thousands of female slaves from across Africa and Europe. Some rose to prominence, but most lived in isolation and servitude.

A Comparison With the Transatlantic Slave Trade
While both the Islamic and transatlantic slave trades were horrific, there are some key differences: The Silence Around the Islamic Slave Trade

One of the most troubling aspects is the modern silencesurrounding the Islamic slave trade. Western academia, media, and even some Black activistsoften avoid the topic. This omission raises important questions:

Why is the transatlantic slave trade remembered while the Islamic slave trade is marginalized?

Why do discussions of reparations rarely address Arab involvement in African enslavement?

Why are former Muslim slaveholding societies not held accountable or asked to apologize?

The Legacy of the Islamic Slave Trade
The legacy of the Islamic slave trade lingers in several disturbing ways:
Racial hierarchiesin Middle Eastern and North African societies persist, where Black Africansare still seen as inferior.

In countries like Mauritaniaand Sudan, slavery continues to exist, often rooted in Islamic justifications.

Afro-Iraqis, Afro-Iranians, and Afro-Pakistanisface discrimination and marginalization.

Islamic textshave not been reformed or reinterpreted to universally denounce slavery, unlike the strong abolitionist movements within Christianity.

Conclusion
The Islamic slave trade is a dark, deeply embedded, and tragically under-discussedchapter of world history. Lasting over a thousand years and impacting millions of lives across Africa, Europe, and Asia, it reveals uncomfortable truths about the religious, racial, and economic forces that shaped civilizations.

To honor the memory of its victims, truth must be told without selective outrage. We cannot truly confront slavery’s legacy without addressing all forms of it, regardless of the perpetrators’ religion or ethnicity.
Understanding the Islamic slave tradeis not about vilifying Muslims or Islam—it’s about facing historical reality, seeking justice, and ensuring that no form of human bondage is forgotten.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a custom that is carried out to control girls' and women's bodies and their sexuality. Among other things, the abuse has to do with the notion that men's and families 'honor is linked to girls' and women's reputation and sexuality. In some countries, for example, it can be difficult for a girl to get married if she has not undergone female genital mutilation.

UNICEF estimates that more than 200 million girls and women around the world have been subjected to some form of genital mutilation. Over 40 million of these are girls under the age of 15.

FGM is a very old custom and tradition with no connection to any particular religion. It occurs in Christian and Muslim groups in several countries in Africa, in some countries in the Middle East and in Asia.

Girls are most often subjected to genital mutilation between the ages of 4 and 14, but genital mutilation also occurs in younger children and can also be repeated several times later in life.

Four forms of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)
Female genital mutilation (FGM) means that larger or smaller parts of the external female genitalia are removed or damaged. There are different forms of FGM. According to the WHO, they are classified into four different types:

The foreskin of the clitoris is cut off. Sometimes the clitoris, or parts of the clitoris, are also cut off.

The entire clitoris is cut off, along with all or part of the inner labia.

All external parts of the genitals, i.e. the clitoris and inner and outer labia are cut off.

Then what is left of the outer labia is sewn together so that the vaginal opening is covered. A small gap is left for urine and menstrual blood to seep out. Also called infibulation.

Other harmful procedures such as tingling (jabbing of the clitoris with a sharp object), cutting, scraping or burning of the clitoris and surrounding tissue.

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a violation of Swedish law as well as human rights. All types of genital mutilation of girls and women have been banned in Sweden since 1982.

According to the National Board of Health and Welfare's survey from 2015, it was estimated that approximately 38,000 girls and women in Sweden live with the consequences of FGM, of which approximately 7,000 are girls under 18 years of age. However, the unofficial number is believed to be larger and among those who are active in the issue, new surveys are expected to show significantly higher figures.

The largest groups of girls and women in Sweden who have been subjected to FGM come mainly from countries such as Somalia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Gambia.

A report from the National Board of Health and Welfare on the care of FGM (2020) states that approximately 5,000 women diagnosed with FGM have sought care in specialist or obstetric care in Sweden from 2012 to 2018. 97 percent of women originally come from an African country and 87 percent are between 18 and 39 years old. In 2018, 52 girls with FGM, aged 0 to 17, sought care and received a diagnosis. There are about 10 girls born in Sweden who sought care and received a diagnosis linked to FGM during the years 2012 to 2018.

Medical facts
For many women, genital mutilation has medical consequences in both the short and long term. Immediate effects are bleeding, infections, damage to nearby organs, shock and, in the worst case, death. In the long term, it can be about abdominal pain, cysts, difficulty urinating, menstrual blood clots in the vagina, pain during intercourse and complications in connection with pregnancy and childbirth.

Girls and women who have been genitally mutilated can be traumatized and suffer from various forms of psychosocial factors. Some girls and women may feel depressed or unwell. Memories of the procedure may remain, even if it happened far back in time. Some girls and women may become depressed, perhaps depressed without understanding that it may be due to the actual genital mutilation. Some girls and women do not know, or may not remember, that they have been mutilated.

Female Genital Mutilation

The distinguishing characteristic of mankind, according to the Quran, is the dignity bestowed upon it by God: “We have dignified the children of Adam ... and favored them over much of creation.” Human dignity is, therefore, a fundamental tenet of the Islamic worldview. It should be no surprise then, that Islam’s emergence and presence in the world has been one which has placed a very high regard on the protection of human rights. This concern is heightened considerably when one turns to the most vulnerable members of society. Indeed, one of the first missions of the Prophet Muhammad was to express his outrage and denunciation at the pre-Islamic Arab customs surrounding newborn girls, customs which saw them as less than human and a source of embarrassment to the family.

These are long-standing and unshakable principles which are representative of the enduring spirit of Islam. It is crucial, therefore, that at this stage in our historical development, they be understood within the context of modern social conditions and the state of scientific knowledge today.

Paraphilias of the Day: Pedophilia, Hebephilia, Ephebophilia, and Pederasty.
What the heck is hebephilia? At times it can be difficult to keep over 500 paraphilias straight, since so many of them run together. Heaven forbid that we confuse any of this the spelling and/or the age brackets.

A recent post at NWO included this line:

Pedophilia…also spelled paedophilia; often confused with hebephilia, ephebophilia, and pederasty.

The efforts to break down common sense moral barriers is being chronicled on this website, and in an article published at NWO, “Promoting Pedophilia,” contributor Muehlenberg writes:

Andrew Gilligan has written an important piece looking very closely at the attempt to make paedophilia fully normal and acceptable. He begins:

“Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

Was this statement from some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties era of abusive celebrities or the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Was it made by an anonymous commenter on some underground website? No again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made last July. It was made as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organizers, to key experts at a conference held by the University of Cambridge. Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”

In The Name Of Allah We The Muslim Of America All Female Most Get Clitoris Removal Per Quran? - https://rumble.com/v70844y-in-the-name-of-allah-we-the-muslim-of-america-all-female-most-get-clitoris-.html

All Female Most Have Genital Mutilation? Or Get Clitoridectomy Per Islamic Laws?. So All Person's Live In U.S.A. Pre-Teens, Girls, Women Most Have Female Genital Mutilation Done by Sept 30, 2030 Per UN Agenda 21 and UN Agenda 2030.

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger. As a medical diagnosis, specific criteria for the disorder extends the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years of age, but adolescents who are 16 years of age or older must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.

Hebephilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in pubescent individuals approximately 11-14 years old, and is one of several types of chronophilia (sexual preference for a specific physiological appearance related to age). It differs from ephebophilia, which is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction to individuals in later adolescence (generally ages 15-19), and differs from pedophilia, which is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children (with the prepubescent age range extending to 13 for diagnostic criteria).

Ephebophilia is the primary or exclusive adult sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19. The term was originally used in the late 19th to mid 20th century. It is one of a number of sexual preferences across age groups subsumed under the technical term chronophilia. Ephebophilia strictly denotes the preference for mid-to-late adolescent sexual partners, not the mere presence of some level of sexual attraction. Some authors define ephebophilia as a sexual preference for pubescent and adolescent boys.

Pederasty or paederasty (US /ˈpɛdəræsti/ or UK /ˈpiːdəræsti/) is a (usually erotic) homosexual relationship between an adult male and a pubescent or adolescent male. The word pederasty derives from Greek (paiderastia) “love of boys”, a compound derived from παῖς (pais) “child, boy” and ἐραστής (erastēs) “lover”.

It’s who they are, right? It’s about love, isn’t it?

That’s enough for today. As promised, click here to read through our important list of questions. Just fill in the blanks with today’s paraphilias and put on your thinking cap.

In the meantime, join us next when we’ll take a look at another paraphilia. If America is to be truly free, shouldn’t all sexcentric-identified individuals be treated equally under the law?

Honor killings are acts of violence, typically murder, committed by family members against a relative, most often a woman, perceived to have brought dishonor upon the family through actions such as refusing a forced marriage, being a victim of rape, seeking divorce, engaging in premarital or extramarital relations, or simply being seen with a man outside of familial or marital bonds.

These acts are not sanctioned by Islam; religious authorities and scholars consistently state that honor killings have no basis in the Quran or Islamic law, and that such violence is a cultural practice, not a religious mandate.

The practice is rooted in patriarchal norms where a woman's body is seen as the repository of family honor, and her actions are believed to reflect on the entire family's reputation.

The decision to commit an honor killing is often made publicly and deliberately, sometimes after consultation within the family, with the intent to cleanse the family's honor in the eyes of the community.

The perpetrators, often male relatives like fathers, brothers, or sons, may view the act as a duty, even while acknowledging their love for the victim.

In some cases, the killer may even turn themselves in to authorities, as seen in documented instances where the perpetrator announced the killing publicly and handed over the weapon.

Honor killings are not confined to a single region or culture. They are reported in countries across the Middle East, South Asia, Europe, North America, and other parts of the world, including Jordan, Iran, Pakistan, India, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

In Jordan, honor killings accounted for one-third of all murders of women in 1999, and despite legal reforms, including the establishment of a special court for honor crimes in 2009, the practice persists.

In Iran, reports indicate that between 2010 and 2014, at least 8,000 honor killings were documented, with the actual number likely higher due to underreporting and deaths disguised as accidents or illness.

The rise in such killings in Iran has been linked to a growing awareness among women of their rights and a resistance to patriarchal control, which some men perceive as a threat to their authority.

Pedophile and A Pizza Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Evidence - https://rumble.com/playlists/bmEJG7NLY1c?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_pl

Legal systems in some countries have historically provided leniency to perpetrators. In Jordan, minors involved in honor killings may receive only a seven-and-a-half-month sentence due to juvenile law, and the average sentence is short, reflecting a broader pattern of impunity.

In Iran, Article 630 of the Penal Code allows a man to kill his wife and her lover if he witnesses them together, and Article 301 protects fathers and grandfathers from retaliation for killing their children, reflecting a legal framework that enables such violence.

Muhammad Married A 9-Year-Old Lady Ayesha Because Messenger of God Said So - https://rumble.com/v2q351m-muhammad-married-a-9-year-old-lady-ayesha-because-messenger-of-god-said-so.html

Is it true that Muhammad married a child bride by the name of Ayesha when he was 53 and she was 9 years old? If so, how do Muslims justify this from their “exemplary” Prophet? The well-established, but not altogether agreed upon, tradition of Lady Ayesha’s age at the time of marrying Prophet Muhammad comes from a hadith in one of the most authentic collections – Sahih al-Bukhari in which Ayesha, herself, states: “The Messenger of God married me when I was six, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.”

Of all the criticism that Islam has endured since it appeared on the scene as a new religion fourteen centuries ago, the marriage of Muhammad to Ayesha was not one of them until fairly recently. Muslim apologists, those who defend the Islamic tradition, would argue that a reason for the absence of such criticism is that marriage and age are so historically and culturally contextual. So, for example, it means something very different to be 9 years old in a society in which life expectancy is short as opposed to long life expectancies in the modern West. In reality, the idea of young girls marrying and even conceiving was quite common in the medieval period. In Christianity, for example, it is commonly accepted that Lady Mary was between 12-14 years of age when she was married to Joseph and when she conceived Jesus of virgin birth. So, the Prophet’s marriage to Ayesha was nothing out of the ordinary for the time in which this marriage took place. Insisting on 21st century (Western) ideas on morality and marriage, which evolved in their own right, for a very different time and place is an ahistorical approach.

Furthermore, the argument goes, there was a great wisdom in the Prophet marrying Ayesha at such a young age. By every historical account, Ayesha grew up to be a very intelligent woman with a sharp memory and was quite bold in asserting herself during and after the Prophet’s life as a scholar, opinionated community leader and diplomat (far from anything you would expect from a supposedly oppressed child bride). According to the same hadith collection, Ayesha was only 18 years old when the Prophet died. She knew the Prophet inside-out, sharing an intimate space and home with him for 9 years and being at his side during major events. As such, Ayesha’s recollection of the Prophet’s Way (sunnah) was considered to be among the most reliable. Much of the authenticated hadith collection in Sunni Islam comes from the narratives of Ayesha, including some of the most intimate affairs of home life. In Sunni Islam it is often said that “one-third of the Shari’ah [sacred law] comes from Ayesha.” After the Prophet’s passing, Ayesha was considered one of the most important early scholars of the developing Islamic tradition until her death four decades later.

Muslim Grooming Gangs have been operating in Britain for decades. In Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child grooming scandal, a Sunday Mirror investigation has revealed that tens of thousands of young girls in thousand's town all over Great Britain were beaten, raped and sold for sex and some have been be-headed too. Despite repeated warnings, the authorities failed to act against the perpetrators and root out the abuse. According to Mirror, the grooming gangs have been operating in Great Britain since the 1980s. As many as a 960,000 thousand girls are feared to have fallen prey to the gangs over the years. Similar heinous crimes had rocked Britain when organized sexual abuse of children, sometimes as young as 9 years old, had emerged all over Great Britain country now. Unfortunately, the establishment in Britain is still not prepared to prioritize the safety and security of their children over hurt sentiments of certain groups.

Why Some Muslim Are Secret Pedophile's "Bacha Bazi" Watching And Having Sex With Children - https://rumble.com/v5jg2tx-why-some-muslim-are-secret-pedophiles-bacha-bazi-watching-and-having-sex-wi.html

So Why Some Men And Millions Other Muslim Are Secret Pedophile's Having Sex With Young Boys And Selling Young Girl As Sex Slaves Too. Bacha bāzī (Persian: lit. 'boy play') is a practice in which men (sometimes called bacha baz) buy and keep adolescent boys (sometimes called dancing boys) for entertainment and sex. It is a custom in Afghanistan and in historical Turkestan that has spread all over the Muslim world and often involves sexual slavery and child prostitution and even ritual murder by older men of young adolescent males. According to German ethnographic research, the phenomenon is up to a thousand years old. As far back as the 9th or 10th century, the mountainous regions that are now northern Afghanistan were known for this practice.

The practice of pedophilia exists in every country, so it is no surprise that in most Muslim country with such men and a lot of corrupt regime and country, it exists there too. At no time did the author of this piece provide the viewers with a sense of the frequency when compared to other countries or a sense of how often this is a matter of slavery vs. a matter of consent. I am disturbed by this video, but not simply because of its presentation of this terrible practice of sexual slavery, rather in this case because the purpose of this film can only be to discredit all the government of Islam in a manner that will motivate even the hard right. If this was a real exposé on pedophilia the focus would have extended beyond Islam.

It is amazing how people can miss the big picture and get off on tangents. We need to remember these are human children that are being taken advantage of. We treat dogs with more respect than these humans. There are people responding here who would rather help some animal than see beyond there selfish and perverted desires and help a defenseless child. Instead of blaming Christian or Muslim religions, why don't we think about these HUMAN children and think of the nightmare they are going through. Whether you are a Catholic priest or a Muslim pedophile who rapes children you are wrong. Being denied the natural use of a woman, or choosing to turn away from the natural affection of the woman, this is where your appetites will end, in perversion! I can't believe the people who try to justify this injustice, by stating history and culture and whatever nonsense they can come up with. This is wrong and perverted and every old kind of filthy, nasty ,reprehensible degradation that can be leveled on an innocent. I wish i was a superhero who could come to the rescue of these innocents, thinking about this too much will make you want to cry! i guess all we can do is pray to God that there will be some justice.

Terror Slavery Chronicles & Other Woman Escapes Sexual Slavery Auction - https://rumble.com/v2d58c4-terror-slavery-chronicles-and-other-woman-escapes-sexual-slavery-auction-gr.html

So Terror Slavery Groups ISIS and U.S.A. and Others Wide World Groups Now Has Sex Slave Rape and Death Guidelines and Slavery Chronicles and There is maps of underground sex-slave bars in the American. Always fascinated by the concept of human slavery and how it worked. (So far I've have seen over 60,000+ ISIS or Muslim and Others auction-block sex slave ad) How was it own a human and see him/her as just a property. How was it to be owned, right-less by law, being bought and sold side by side to other animals. How was it to be part of a community where, by pure luck mostly, you might own every thing and live as a king without any effort, or you might own nothing even yourself So Here I Imagine a world where slavery became legal again. I write some times as a master/mistress, sometimes as a slave and some times as just an observer. I will even share some posts of interest, and write some true historical excerpts about slavery. Excuse my English, I am not a native speaker P.S. It is pure fantasy Just when you thought ISIS couldn’t get any worse, they have now put out guidelines for how to rape your sex slaves. "Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when "owners" of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

Originally A Sufi War Dance ? - So US Rep. Ilhan Omar Say This Is True Freedom Of Religion With Sharia Law In America - https://rumble.com/v463jd3-rep.-ilhan-omar-say-this-is-true-freedom-of-religion-with-one-nation-under-.html

Wow, I don't know how people can do this to children. It is depressing that this is not just happening in this region of the world but it is virtually part of every culture.

Something has to be done and while I agree that this is in part caused by the oppression of women, I would disagree. These people are just sick, because even in Western culture this takes place. It is just more subtle and in the shadows of our society.

UK Grooming Gangs How Minor Girls As Young As 9 Yrs. Old Were Groomed, Raped, Beaten, And Killed By Muslim Predators Across Cities As Authorities Turned A blind Eye !

UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now.

Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

The day of Ashura is marked by Muslims as a whole, but for Shia Muslims it is a major religious commemoration of the martyrdom at Karbala of Hussein, a grandson of the Prophet Muhammad.

It falls on the 10th of Muharram, the first month of the Islamic lunar calendar.

It is marked by Muslims with a voluntary day of fasting which commemorates the day Noah left the Ark, and the day that Moses was saved from the Egyptians by God.

For Shia Muslims, Ashura is a solemn day of mourning the martyrdom of Hussein in 680 AD at Karbala in modern-day Iraq.

It is marked with mourning rituals and passion plays re-enacting the martyrdom.

Shia men and women dressed in black also parade through the streets slapping their chests and chanting.

Some Shia men seek to emulate the suffering of Hussein by flagellating themselves with chains or cutting their foreheads until blood streams from their bodies.

Some Shia leaders and groups discourage the bloodletting, saying it creates a backward and negative image of Shia Muslims. Such leaders encourage people to donate blood.

Today, Shias Comprise About 18% Of The Total Worldwide 1.8 Billion Muslim Population. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3287819/Spilling-blood-religion-Tiny-Shi-ite-Muslim-boys-whip-sharp-blades-mourn-death-Prophet-Muhammad-s-grandson.html

Spilling blood for their religion Shi'ite Muslim men and boys whip themselves with sharp blades to mourn the death of Prophet Muhammad's grandson. Shi'ite Muslims all over the world have been beating themselves with sharp blades, covering their bodies in mud and lighting bonfires in the streets to mourn the death of the Prophet Muhammad's grandson today.

The ruling on castration. What is the ruling on eunuchs? What are the laws that apply to them? Should they pray with the men or with the women?

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

Firstly:

Castration is removal of the testicles. The Arabic word translated here as castration may also refer to removal of the testicles and penis.

Some scholars differentiated between the two and said: If his testicles only are cut off, then he is a eunuch; if his penis is cut off, then he is emasculated.

It is haraam for a person to do that deliberately to himself or to someone else.

In al-Mawsoo‘ah al-Fiqhiyyah (19/120, 121) it says:

Castration of the human is haraam, whether he is a child or an adult, because of the prohibition on that, which we will see below:

Ibn Hajar said: it is prohibited, therefore it is haraam, and there is no difference of opinion concerning that in the case of the sons of Adam (i.e., humans).

Among the reports that confirm this prohibition is the following:

‘Abdullah ibn Mas‘ood said: We were on a campaign with the Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), and we had no women with us. We said: Why don’t we get ourselves castrated? But he forbade us to do that.

Narrated by al-Bukhaari (4787) and Muslim (1404).

According to the hadeeth of Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqaas: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) forbade ‘Uthmaan ibn Maz’oon to be celibate. If he had given him permission, we would have gotten ourselves castrated.

Narrated by al-Bukhaari (4786) and Muslim (1402).

Ibn Hajar said, commenting on these hadeeths:

The wisdom behind the prohibition on castration is that it is contrary to what the Lawgiver wants of increasing reproduction to ensure continuation of jihad against the disbelievers. Otherwise, if permission had been given for that, then many people would have done that, and reproduction would have ceased, and the numbers of Muslims would have become less as a result, and the numbers of disbelievers would have increased, and that is contrary to the purpose for which the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) was sent.

It also has a number of negative consequences: self-injury, deformity and causing harm that may lead to death. It also eliminates the quality of masculinity that Allah created in the man, and it is changing the creation of Allah, and is a kind of ingratitude for blessings. Moreover it is an imitation of women and choosing that which is imperfect over that which is perfect.

End quote. Fath al-Baari (9/119).

Secondly:

The eunuch who has lost all desire for women comes under the same heading as “old male servants who lack vigour”, who are the ones for whom it is permissible to see a woman’s adornment as her mahrams are allowed to see it.

Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc.) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like palms of hands or one eye or both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer dress like veil, gloves, head-cover, apron, etc.), and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms, etc.) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands fathers, their sons, their husbands sons, their brothers or their brothers sons, or their sisters sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e. their sisters in Islam), or the (female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who lack vigour, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex. And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful.”

[an-Noor 24:31].

Ibn al-‘Arabi al-Maaliki (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

Ashhab said: Maalik was asked: Can a woman take off her head cover in front of a eunuch? Is he one of those who “lack vigour”? He said: Yes, if he is her slave or the slave of someone else. But in the case of one who is free, then no.

Ahkaam al-Qur’an (6/73).

The Hanafis differed concerning that – according to one of their views – but the most correct view is that of the majority.

In al-Mawsoo‘ah al-Fiqhiyyah (3/8) it says:

The more correct view according to the Hanafis is that with regard to looking at a non-mahram woman, the eunuch, the emasculated man, the old man, the slave, the effeminate man, the feeble-minded man, and the simpleton are like the one who possesses vigour, because a eunuch may have intercourse and his child may be attributed to him, and the emasculated man may feel pleasure and ejaculate, and the effeminate man is an evildoer who possesses vigour. As for the feeble-minded man and the simpleton, they feel desire, and they may speak of what they see.

The Maalikis, Shaafa‘is and Hanbalis – and one view among the Hanafis – say that the ruling on men who “lack vigour” is the same as the ruling on mahrams with regard to looking at women: they may see of them the places where adornment is worn, such as the hair and forearms; they also come under the same ruling as mahrams with regard to entering upon them, because Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning): “… or old male servants who lack vigour...” [an-Noor 24:31].

End quote.

The scholars of the Standing Committee were asked: What is meant by “… or old male servants who lack vigour...” [an-Noor 24:31]?

They replied:

What is meant by those who lack vigour is those who serve the people of a household by bringing food and the like and have no need of women because they are impotent or feebleminded, so they pay no attention to that which may provoke desire of adornment and beauty, or old men whom age has weakened to the point that they pay no attention to women, and others who have lost all desire for women for various reasons, so they are safe to be with, and there is no fear of temptation from them. So women may show before them whatever adornment it is permissible for them to show in front of their mahrams as mentioned in the verse, and those who come under the same rulings, such as women and young children who have not reached the age of discernment whereby they can understand what a woman’s ‘awrah is and be provoked by it.

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn baaz, Shaykh ‘Abd ar-Razzaaq ‘Afeefi, Shaykh ‘Abdullah ibn Ghadyaan, Shaykh ‘Abdullah ibn Qa‘ood.

Fataawa al-Lajnah ad-Daa’imah (4/264, 265)

In the case of one who is thought not to be one of those men who lack vigour, and appears to be otherwise, he is to be regarded like other men who possess vigour, and he is not to be allowed to see the adornment of non-mahram women.

It was narrated that ‘Aa’ishah said: An effeminate man used to enter upon the wives of the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him), and they regarded him as one of those who are without desire. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) came in one day when he was with one of his wives, and he was describing a woman. He said: She shows four folds when facing you and eight when she turns her back. The Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “I see that he knows about these things. He should not enter upon you.” She said: And they observed hijab before him.

Narrated by Muslim (2181).

An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

With regard to the effeminate man initially entering upon the Mothers of the Believers, the reason for that is explained in this hadeeth, which is that they thought that he was one of those who lack vigour and that it was permissible for him to enter upon them. But when these words were heard from him, it became known that he was one of those who possess vigour, so the Prophet (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) forbade him to enter upon them.

From this we learn that it is forbidden for any effeminate man to enter upon women and it is forbidden for them to appear before him, and it is clear that he comes under the same ruling as men who possess vigour and feel desire for women in this sense. The same applies to the eunuch and the emasculated man (one whose penis has been cut off).

Sharh Muslim (14/163).

Thirdly:

With regard to wearing ihram, praying, and other rulings, they come under the same ruling as men. So they should not enter the women’s prayer halls or pray next to the women, and they should wear what men wear in ihram. There is no difference of opinion among the scholars concerning that.

Ibn al-Mundhir (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

(The scholars) are unanimously agreed that the rulings on eunuchs and emasculated men, with regard to covering the ‘awrah during prayer, leading the prayer, garments to be worn when in ihram, shares of inheritance, and shares of war booty, are the same as the rulings on men.

Al-Ijmaa‘ (p. 78).

And Allah knows best.

15 ‘rules’ from Islamic State’s fatwa on ‘sex with female slaves’.
Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when “owners” of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when “owners” of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

The ruling or fatwa has the force of law and appears to go beyond the Islamic State’s previous known utterances on the subject, a leading Islamic State scholar said. It sheds new light on how the group is trying to reinterpret centuries-old teachings to justify the sexual slavery of women in the swaths of Syria and Iraq it controls.

The fatwa was among a huge trove of documents captured by US Special Operations Forces during a raid targeting a top Islamic State official in Syria in May. Reuters has reviewed some of the documents, which have not been previously published.

Among the religious rulings are bans on a father and son having sex with the same female slave; and the owner of a mother and daughter having sex with both. Joint owners of a female captive are similarly enjoined from intercourse because she is viewed as “part of a joint ownership.”

Here are 15 points from the fatwa:

1) It is not permissible for the owner of a female captive to have intercourse with her until after she has had menstrual cycle and becomes clean.

2) If she does not menstruate and is pregnant, he is not allowed to have intercourse with her until after she has given birth.

3) It is not permissible to cause her to abort if she is pregnant.

4) If the owner of a female captive releases her, only he can have intercourse with her and he cannot allow someone else to have intercourse with her.

5) If the owner of a female captive, who has a daughter suitable for intercourse, has sexual relations with the latter, he is not permitted to have intercourse with her mother and she is permanently off limits to him. Should he have intercourse with her mother then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her daughter and she is to be off-limits to him.

6) The owner of two sisters is not allowed to have intercourse with both of them; rather he may only have intercourse with just one. The other sister is to be had by him, if he were to relinquish ownership of the first sister by selling her, giving her away or releasing her.

7) If the female captive is owned by a father, his son cannot have intercourse with her and vice-versa. Moreover, intercourse with his wife’s female captive is also not permissible.

8) If a father had intercourse with his female captive then gave her away or sold her to his son, he is no longer permitted to have intercourse with her.

9) If the female captive becomes pregnant by her owner, he cannot sell her and she is released after his death.

10) If the owner releases his female captive then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her afterwards because she has become free and is no longer his property.

11) If two or more individuals are involved in purchasing a female captive, none of them are permitted to have sex with her because she is part of a joint ownership.

12) It is not permissible to have intercourse with a female captive during her menstrual cycle.

13) It is not permissible top have anal sex with a female captive.

14) The owner of a female captive should show compassion towards her, be kind to her, not humiliate her and not assign her work she is unable to perform.

15) The owner of a female captive should not sell her to an individual whom he knows will treat her badly or do unto her what Allah has forbidden.

IS issues fatwa on when female slave ‘owners’ can have sex with them.
Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when “owners” of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

Islamic State theologians have issued an extremely detailed ruling on when “owners” of women enslaved by the extremist group can have sex with them, in an apparent bid to curb what they called violations in the treatment of captured females.

The ruling or fatwa has the force of law and appears to go beyond the Islamic State’s previous known utterances on the subject, a leading Islamic State scholar said. It sheds new light on how the group is trying to reinterpret centuries-old teachings to justify the sexual slavery of women in the swaths of Syria and Iraq it controls.

The fatwa was among a huge trove of documents captured by US Special Operations Forces during a raid targeting a top Islamic State official in Syria in May. Reuters has reviewed some of the documents, which have not been previously published.

Among the religious rulings are bans on a father and son having sex with the same female slave; and the owner of a mother and daughter having sex with both. Joint owners of a female captive are similarly enjoined from intercourse because she is viewed as “part of a joint ownership.”

The United Nations and human rights groups have accused the Islamic State of the systematic abduction and rape of thousands of women and girls as young as 12, especially members of the Yazidi minority in northern Iraq. Many have been given to fighters as a reward or sold as sex slaves.

Far from trying to conceal the practice, Islamic State has boasted about it and established a department of “war spoils” to manage slavery. Reuters reported on the existence of the department on Monday.

In an April report, Human Rights Watch interviewed 20 female escapees who recounted how Islamic State fighters separated young women and girls from men and boys and older women. They were moved “in an organized and methodical fashion to various places in Iraq and Syria.” They were then sold or given as gifts and repeatedly raped or subjected to sexual violence.

Dos and don’ts

Fatwa No 64, dated Jan. 29, 2015, and issued by Islamic State’s Committee of Research and Fatwas, appears to codify sexual relations between IS fighters and their female captives for the first time, going further than a pamphlet issued by the group in 2014 on how to treat slaves.

The fatwa starts with a question: “Some of the brothers have committed violations in the matter of the treatment of the female slaves. These violations are not permitted by Sharia law because these rules have not been dealt with in ages. Are there any warnings pertaining to this matter?”

It then lists 15 injunctions, which in some instances go into explicit detail. For example:

“If the owner of a female captive, who has a daughter suitable for intercourse, has sexual relations with the latter, he is not permitted to have intercourse with her mother and she is permanently off limits to him. Should he have intercourse with her mother then he is not permitted to have intercourse with her daughter and she is to be off limits to him.”

Islamic State’s sexual exploitation of female captives has been well documented, but a leading IS expert at Princeton University, Cole Bunzel, who has reviewed many of the group’s writings, said the fatwa went beyond what has previously been published by the militants on how to treat female slaves.

“It reveals the actual concerns of IS slave owners,” he said in an email.

Still, he cautioned that not “everything dealt with in the fatwa is indicative of a relevant violation. It doesn’t mean father and son were necessarily sharing a girl. They’re at least being ‘warned’ not to. But I bet some of these violations were being committed.”

The fatwa also instructs owners of female slaves to “show compassion towards her, be kind to her, not humiliate her, and not assign her work she is unable to perform.” An owner should also not sell her to an individual whom he knows will mistreat her.

Professor Abdel Fattah Alawari, dean of Islamic Theology at Al-Azhar University, a 1,000-year-old Egyptian center for Islamic learning, said Islamic State “has nothing to do with Islam” and was deliberately misreading centuries-old verses and sayings that were originally designed to end, rather than encourage, slavery.

“Islam preaches freedom to slaves, not slavery. Slavery was the status quo when Islam came around,” he said. “Judaism, Christianity, Greek, Roman, and Persian civilizations all practiced it and took the females of their enemies as sex slaves. So Islam found this abhorrent practice and worked to gradually remove it.”

In September 2014 more than 120 Islamic scholars from around the world issued an open letter to IS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi refuting the group’s religious arguments to justify many of its actions. The scholars noted that the “reintroduction of slavery is forbidden in Islam.”

Pedophile and A Pizza Secret Human Trafficking and Child Sex Ring Evidence - https://rumble.com/playlists/bmEJG7NLY1c?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_pl

Islamic Proof Sharia Law Is The Real Threat Death To American Freedom And Its Way Of Life The Chilling Statistic: Over 47,000 Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11 Across 70+ Countries 1979 Thru 2024

https://www.fondapol.org/app/uploads/2024/10/enquete-terrorisme_2021_gb_2024-09-30_w.pdf

The Death To America Crusade And Iranian Revolution Started (1979 - 2030) A culminated in the overthrow of the Pahlavi dynasty and the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The process began with widespread protests and strikes against the rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, fueled by discontent over his regime's perceived corruption, repression, and reliance on foreign powers, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom.

https://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/america-sharia-law.html

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that speak of war with nonbelievers, usually on the basis of their status as non-Muslims.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims and Other who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

https://answering-islam.org/Authors/Wood/pedophile.htm

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad's own martial legacy - and that of his companions - along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.

Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1001+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

Show less