Premium Only Content
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
The Supreme Court is hearing Louisiana v. Callais this week, a case that could upend American politics overnight. Since 1986, Democrats have used Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to draw majority-minority districts through racial gerrymandering, gaining an estimated 30-seat edge in the House. Now, the conservative Court is questioning whether these race-based maps violate the 14th and 15th Amendments. A ruling against gerrymandering could hand Republicans 17–30 seats instantly. We explain how Democrats weaponized civil rights law into a political cheat code, why the Left is panicking, and what this means for Congress. With Trump’s Supreme Court picks and redistricting in GOP states, the stage is set for a historic shift in power.
#trump #news #supremecourt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*DISCLAIMER*
Proceed with caution: You're about to experience the wild musings of a certified nutcase. Designed purely for entertainment purposes, chuckles and grins, the views expressed in this video are solely those of a man whose love for sarcasm is only outmatched by his inability to pass up a good Philly cheesesteak.
The content on this channel may cause sudden bouts of laughter, eye-rolling, or, in extreme cases, enlightenment. You listen at your own risk, especially if you are prone to missing jokes or allergic to different opinions.
You've been warned.
---------------------------------------
This video may include copyrighted material used for educational and informational purposes, such as parody, commentary, and criticism. Such use is protected under the “fair use” doctrine outlined in Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. Relevant case law includes Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F. Supp. 3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (510 U.S. 569, 1994), Equals Three, Kelly v. Arriba-Soft (336 F.3d 811, 9th Cir. 2003), LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015), and Fisher v. Dees (794 F.2d 432, 9th Cir. 1986), and others.
© 2025 Copyright Jabberhouse Media, LLC, DBA RPW Media
-
7:49
RPWMedia
11 days agoCuomo’s Ad Backfires Or Brilliant Strategy?
422 -
48:42
Donald Trump Jr.
5 hours agoCommunism vs Common Sense, What's Next for NYC? | TRIGGERED Ep.289
114K246 -
1:31:25
The Charlie Kirk Show
4 hours agoTHOUGHTCRIME Ep. 104 — Post-Election Palette Cleanser + Tucker/Fuentes Interview Reaction
74.4K28 -
LIVE
tminnzy
2 hours agoSmooth Moves Only 💨 | Naraka: Bladepoint Chill Gameplay | !gx
100 watching -
1:04:33
BonginoReport
5 hours agoWill The LA Dodgers Dodge WH Visit?! - Nightly Scroll w/ Hayley Caronia (Ep.172) - 11/06/2025
48.8K66 -
3:23:13
Tundra Tactical
6 hours ago $0.01 earnedDadlefield Game Night BF6 New Update Weapon Grind
28.5K5 -
15:39
Megyn Kelly
6 hours agoTucker Carlson on Why He Interviewed Nick Fuentes and What He Wanted to Convey To Him
63.9K82 -
1:14:10
Kim Iversen
5 hours agoZionists PANIC Over Muslim Mayor In NYC
94.3K185 -
1:50:40
Redacted News
6 hours agoBREAKING! Trump Makes HUGE Announcement Trying To Save MAGA, Cost of Living & Israel CRUSHED GOP
124K240 -
10:09:39
Dr Disrespect
11 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - ARC RAIDERS - QUEST MASTER
137K16