Rand Paul: Del Bigtree Has Been Effective in the American Fight to Drain the Swamp

Luke 2:1 And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.

Google AI Overview states that the U.S. forces attacked Iraq in 2003 to remove weapons of mass destruction. So if the U.S. forces do not find any weapons of mass destruction doesn't that make the American U.S. forces the terrorists?

An Google AI Overview is not available for this search

Remind me why the U.S. forces attacked Hawaii? Why In 1893, U.S. Marines assisted in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy?

The 1893, U.S. Marines assisted in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy does that make the American U.S. forces the terrorists?

An Google AI Overview is not available for this search

Google AI Overview

U.S.-backed overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy (1893)

American business owners, primarily sugar plantation owners, grew to have outsized influence in the Hawaiian Kingdom by the late 19th century. In 1893, after Queen Liliʻuokalani attempted to restore the power of the monarchy and native Hawaiians, a group of businessmen conspired to overthrow the queen.

The coup: Known as the Committee of Safety, the group asked for help from John L. Stevens, the U.S. Minister to Hawaii. Stevens sent 162 U.S. sailors and Marines from the USS Boston ashore. Though under orders of neutrality, their presence supported the coup.
The result: Facing overwhelming U.S. military power, Queen Liliʻuokalani surrendered her authority to prevent bloodshed. The new Provisional Government, led by Sanford B. Dole, intended to annex Hawaii to the United States.

U.S. apology: In 1993, the U.S. Congress passed the Apology Resolution, which admitted that the overthrow was "with the active participation of agents and citizens of the United States" and was illegal.

Google AI Overview

on This day, January 17th, 132 years ago in 1893.... Ka La O ...
U.S. Marines assisted in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy in 1893 to support a group of American businessmen and sugar planters who wanted to depose Queen Liliʻuokalani and annex Hawaii. The coup was orchestrated by the "Committee of Safety" who cited the Queen's attempts to restore power to Native Hawaiians and create a new constitution as a threat to their interests. The presence of U.S. Marines, under the command of U.S. Minister John L. Stevens, provided the military backing for the coup, allowing the Committee to take control by deterring any armed resistance from the Queen's supporters.

Economic interests: American businessmen in Hawaii, primarily sugar planters, feared the Queen's plan to create a new constitution that would re-enfranchise Native Hawaiians and weaken their political and economic power. They saw annexation by the United States as the only permanent solution for their business interests, especially after the end of U.S. sugar tariffs in 1890.

U.S. diplomatic and military support: The U.S. Minister to Hawaii, John L. Stevens, was a key conspirator who supported the Committee of Safety's plans. He ordered 300 U.S. Marines from the USS Boston to land, ostensibly to protect American lives and property.

Deterrence of resistance: The presence of U.S. troops created a show of force that prevented the Hawaiian monarchy from mounting a successful defense. Queen Liliʻuokalani ultimately surrendered her authority under protest, yielding to the "superior force of the United States," in the hope that the U.S. government would rectify the situation and reinstate her.

Del Bigtree Has Been Effective in the American Fight to Drain the Swamp

Google AI Overview

Based on Del Bigtree's public record, viewers of his show The HighWire and supporters of his organizations may believe he is effective in combating what they perceive as corruption and undue influence, or "the swamp," within the government and pharmaceutical industry. However, his critics, including public health experts and journalists, contend that his activism involves promoting misinformation and conspiracy theories.

Activities viewed as "draining the swamp"

Bigtree's work focuses on scrutinizing government health officials and institutions, which is a common theme for those who seek to "drain the swamp".

Critiquing the establishment: As CEO of the anti-vaccination group Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), Bigtree has challenged federal health authorities and criticized their handling of public health, including during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Influencing health policy: Bigtree and ICAN have lobbied legislators to keep vaccination exemptions in place and pursue legal claims against vaccine mandates.

Political involvement: Bigtree served as communications director for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s 2024 presidential campaign and later took a leading role in MAHA Action and the MAHA Alliance super PAC, which continue to pursue a "Make America Healthy Again" agenda.

Controversies and criticisms

Conversely, critics contend that Bigtree's methods and associations undermine his supposed anti-establishment goals and instead spread dangerous misinformation, which is counter to the idea of a healthy public square.

Promoting misinformation: Bigtree has been widely criticized by the scientific community and journalists for promoting baseless and conspiratorial health claims. He has amplified discredited theories, including the debunked link between vaccines and autism, and spread false narratives about COVID-19.

Associating with conspiracists: Bigtree and his organizations have associated with other promoters of conspiracy theories. For example, ICAN paid a consulting fee to Uncover DC, a website founded by a QAnon promoter, and Bigtree has streamed the Plandemic conspiracy films on his show.

Financial conflicts: While criticizing the pharmaceutical industry's funding of health officials, Bigtree has been paid through organizations and campaigns he is associated with. For example, he received a salary from ICAN and consulting fees from Kennedy's campaign, for which he also solicited donations.

Exaggerating influence: Despite being removed from platforms like YouTube and Facebook for spreading misinformation, Bigtree has continued to claim his audience is growing and that his efforts are having a significant impact.

For those who define "draining the swamp" as holding powerful interests accountable, Bigtree's actions may be seen as a legitimate challenge to the medical and pharmaceutical establishment. For those concerned with misinformation, scientific evidence, and potential financial motivations, his work is considered an example of the very kind of misleading and self-serving behavior the movement claims to oppose.

Drain the Swamp - Imprimis - Hillsdale College
Hillsdale College
hillsdale.edu
Nov 19, 2024 — He has been canceled, derided, slandered, libeled, investigated, searched, impeached, arrested, prosecuted, tried, convicted, shot, and yet…

Del Bigtree talks with Rand Paul

Google AI Overview

While details on any recent private talks between Del Bigtree and Rand Paul are not publicly available, Bigtree featured Paul on his show The Highwire in March 2024 to discuss alleged COVID-19 "cover-ups". Both have also been vocal critics of vaccine mandates and certain public health officials.

Del Bigtree and Rand Paul's public commentary
Interview on The Highwire (March 2024): Bigtree, a prominent voice in
the anti-vaccine movement, hosted Senator Paul to discuss the government's response to the pandemic, including alleged cover-ups and vaccine safety.

Criticism of vaccine mandates: The conversation was consistent with Bigtree and Paul's established public views. Both have frequently criticized vaccine mandates and questioned the official narrative surrounding the pandemic.

Paul's public criticisms of Dr. Fauci: A significant part of Paul's public commentary on the pandemic has centered on his clashes with Dr. Anthony Fauci during Senate committee hearings. In an October 2025 hearing, Paul questioned Fauci's COVID-19 response, to which Fauci responded that Paul was "egregiously incorrect".

Expert counter-arguments: Some of Paul's claims regarding vaccines have been refuted by medical experts. A September 2025 article in Forbes fact-checked several of Paul's comments, asserting they were not backed by scientific evidence and could erode public trust in public health officials.

The purpose of public "talks"

Bigtree and Paul's public discussions serve to advance a specific narrative regarding vaccine policy and government health mandates. Their public statements align with the broader anti-vaccine movement promoted by The Highwire and other platforms.

Complete exchange between Sen. Rand. Paul and Dr. ...
C-SPAN Video
c-span.org
18 hours ago — Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) questions Dr. Anthony Fauci during Senate HELP Committee hearing on COVID-19 Response. FAUCI: "It makes me very ...

Who was the president of the USSR when the Soviet Union ended? Mikhail Gofbachev.

Google AI Overview

Mikhail Gorbachev was the president of the Soviet Union when it ended in December 1991. He was the first and only person to hold this title, as the office was created in 1990 and abolished upon the dissolution of the Soviet state.

Key details about Gorbachev and the end of the USSR:
Final resignation: On December 25, 1991, Gorbachev formally resigned as president in a televised address. The Soviet flag was lowered over the Kremlin for the final time and replaced with the Russian tricolor flag.

Catalyst for collapse: Gorbachev's policies of glasnost ("openness") and perestroika ("restructuring"), intended to reform the Soviet system, unintentionally led to its collapse. The reforms allowed for greater freedom and fueled growing nationalist movements within the constituent republics.

The August Coup: In August 1991, communist hardliners attempted a coup to oust Gorbachev and stop his reforms. The coup failed but irreparably weakened his authority and accelerated the independence of the Soviet republics.

Dissolution declaration: Following the failed coup, the leaders of Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus signed the Belovezha Accords on December 8, 1991, declaring that the Soviet Union no longer existed. The formal dissolution occurred on December 26, 1991.

As the president of the Soviet Union did Mikhail Gorbachev swear an oath to the Soviet Union Constitution?

Google AI Overview

Yes, Mikhail Gorbachev swore an oath to the Soviet Union Constitution when he became president. The presidency was a new office created in 1990, and Gorbachev was the first and only person to hold the title.

Details of the event:
On March 15, 1990, Gorbachev was sworn in as president of the Soviet Union after being elected by the Congress of People's Deputies.

During the ceremony, he took the oath with his right hand on a red, bound copy of the Soviet Constitution.

The oath affirmed his commitment to serve the Soviet people, uphold the constitution, protect citizens' rights, and fulfill his presidential responsibilities.

This event occurred just a year and a half before the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991.

Donald Trump swore an oath to the United States Constitution when he became president. What if Donald Trump did the same thing that Mikhail Gorbachev did? Maybe the American people need to be prepared in the event that Donald Trump pulls the run from under our Constitutional Republic?

Join the Weekly Video Call
constitutionhelp.com