# 1

8 days ago
21

Coloring agreement “trustees” officials in question, “trustees” under Oath, to an agreement,

PUBLIC JUDICIAL OFFICIALS OF OATH OF OFFICE ARE BONDING UNDER OATH:
106 U.S. 196,,,, 1 S.Ct 240,,, 289 U.S. 227 & Inter alia.

Pa. Const. Art. V. Sec. 18(d)(1), board is for investigating judicial discipline for violation of Sec. 17 of this Art. V, misconduct in
office, neglect, failure to perform, prejudice to the adm. of justice, capacity prohibited by law, violations of [canon] & [rules prescribed by the Supreme Court].

This judge refused to perform his/her own sworn OATH, DUTY, but CONTINUES to cash his/her pay check & NOT EXECUTE CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. constitutes FRAUD & only performs JUDICIAL ATRACITIES of law, DERELICTION OF DUTY, DEFALCATION, EMBEZZLEMENT OF PUBLC FUNDS.

Court statues exposed, judges ignored court procedures court trends transgressive on equal protection & any due process, reliability of written laws, in meaning, what it is says & saying, what it means has suffered the detriment of all.

Loading comments...