There is no WAY Charlie Kirk was shot by a 30-06

Description:
In this video, we break down the claims surrounding the supposed .30-06 rifle shot that allegedly hit Charlie Kirk. Many are saying the wound could have come from a high-velocity round at 120–200 yards, but after real testing with a 6.5 Creedmoor at 250 yards and comparisons with .30-06 and 5.56 NATO rounds, the evidence just doesn’t add up.
A neck shot from a high-powered rifle like the .30-06 would cause catastrophic damage, not the type of wound shown. Even with arguments that the bullet could have lodged in vertebrae, the energy transfer and wound channel prove otherwise. What we’re seeing looks much more like a low-velocity, close-range impact—not a long-distance sniper shot.
We’ll also talk about the missing high-definition footage from multiple camera angles that has yet to be released. Why is the full video being withheld? What are we not being shown?
If you’re interested in ballistics testing, rifle comparisons, and debunking misleading narratives, you’ll want to watch this breakdown.
🔫 Topics Covered:
.30-06 ballistics vs. wound analysis
6.5 Creedmoor clay block testing at 250 yards
5.56 NATO velocity & energy comparison
Why Charlie Kirk’s wound doesn’t match a high-powered rifle round
The unanswered questions about missing HD footage
👉 Don’t forget to Like, Comment, and Subscribe for more in-depth breakdowns, theories, and firearms testing.
#CharlieKirk #BallisticsTesting #RifleBallistics #FirearmsAnalysis #SniperShot #Debunked #FirearmTesting
#firearmstraining
#tactical #gunchannel #youtube #gunreviews