Virology — A Critique of Its Foundations - Mike Stone

BRILLIANT 5-minute overview of why "modern virology" is not a real science, but is instead a pseudoscience built on false assumptions and logical fallacies. Here are the basics introduced in this first episode (video embedded below):
Germ “theory” is a falsified hypothesis.

Pasteur, Koch, and others failed to prove any bacteria “pathogenic” using logical evidence derived from the scientific method.

The “virus” concept was invented as a workaround to avoid the evidence that had already falsified the germ “theory.”

Virologists have never purified and isolated particles presumed to be “viruses” prior to experimentation in order to use them as an independent variable and establish causation.

Instead, they assume a “virus” is present in unpurified fluids from sick hosts, never purify or isolate it, and mix these fluids with a cocktail of substances—fetal bovine serum, antibiotics, animal or aborted fetal cells, chemicals, etc.

They then point to an artificial, lab-created effect (the cytopathic effect, or CPE) as “proof” that a “virus” was present and caused cell death.

Their reasoning relies heavily on logical fallacies such as begging the question, affirming the consequent, and false cause fallacies (more on this in Episode Two).

From this flawed set-up, virologists lean on indirect evidence—electron microscope images, genomic data, “antibody” testing, and animal torture—to infer the existence of “viruses.”

Yet they have never provided direct evidence, through the scientific method and Koch’s Postulates, proving that such entities exist, cause disease, and can transmit between humans.

The result: virology is not science but pseudoscience, built on a false foundation.

If you’d like to go deeper into the arguments against germ “theory” and virology, my article Intro to ViroLIEgy expands on these points with more detail and references.

See the amazing website by Mike Stone:
https://viroliegy.com/

Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=feNt0uGo3dY