Charlie Kirk Assassination, Does this prove the microphone was an explosive?!

Charlie Kirk Assassination: What They’re NOT Telling You | Rifle Analysis, Ballistics & Inconsistencies
In today’s video, we dive into the strange inconsistencies surrounding the alleged Charlie Kirk assassination. While avoiding the political noise and media spin, I focus strictly on the firearms, ballistics, and the physical plausibility of the official narrative.
💥 Was it really a 30-06 rifle?
🎯 Could the supposed shooter even carry and deploy the weapon as claimed?
🛡️ Was Charlie Kirk wearing body armor—or is something else going on here?
📏 What does the entry/exit wound tell us about the trajectory and caliber used?
🏢 Could there have been a second shooter?
I use real rifles, tactical gear, and ballistic demonstrations (including slow-motion clay tests) to analyze:
Rifle disassembly and concealment myths
Backpack size and weapon fit
Bullet trajectory and wound patterns
Energy comparisons: .30-06 vs. 6.5 Creedmoor
Armor spalling tests and shirt damage
🚨 My Conclusion: The narrative doesn’t add up. I believe the rifle was a different caliber, the man on the roof wasn’t the actual shooter, and a second shooter theory makes a lot more sense based on the available evidence.
👉 What do YOU think? Drop a comment below — I want to hear your thoughts.
👍 Don’t forget to LIKE, COMMENT, and SUBSCRIBE for more breakdowns, gear tests, and truth-seeking analysis.
🔔 Hit the bell so you don’t miss future uploads.
#CharlieKirk #AssassinationAnalysis #SecondShooterTheory #BallisticsTest #FirearmBreakdown #GunAnalysis #ConcealedCarry #RifleTest #GunTruth #AR15 #30-06 #65Creedmoor #PlausibilityCheck #ConspiracyOrCoverup