Andrew McCabe on Comey Indictment: ‘Vengeance,’ Leak Claims, and DOJ Pressure Questions | CNN2.0

🎙️ Andrew McCabe says he was never contacted by investigators about Comey’s case and notes the indictment contains scant facts, raising questions about the probe’s thoroughness and transparency.
🧾 McCabe rejects being “Person Three” and points to Daniel Richman, a Comey associate and SGE, as the likely figure tied to past leak inquiries later closed without charges in 2020.
⚖️ On perjury claims, McCabe says he never saw Comey authorize others to leak and argues the cited testimony is too unclear to support a false‑statement prosecution.
🚨 Motive framing: McCabe calls the case part of a broader “revenge tour,” linking it to public pressure on DOJ leadership changes and the President’s stated intent to pursue additional opponents.
📜 Context recalled: McCabe references early‑term interactions and memos after concerns about interference, contrasting then‑private pressure with today’s public social‑media directives.
🔎 Watchlist: Motions challenging clarity of testimony, any new leak‑case evidence, and whether additional prosecutions align with a pattern of retaliatory intent.

#AndrewMcCabe #Comey #Indictment #DOJ #Leaks #DanielRichman #Perjury #Vengeance #RuleOfLaw #CNN2Point0