Bad Teacher
~ Supplemental Material ~
"When politics is no longer a mission but a profession, politicians become more self-serving than public servants."
- Emmanuel Macron
In the grand theater of American politics; a realm where perception is the ultimate currency and narrative is the sacred script; Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill has proven herself a virtuoso of persona. She presents a meticulously curated portfolio of American archetypes: the pioneering naval officer; the stern federal prosecutor; the concerned mother.
This is not a life organically lived but a role meticulously performed. A character crafted with the precision of a Hollywood studio, to project an aura of unassailable integrity. Her biographical narrative is polished to a cinematic gloss, for public consumption. The stagecraft is impeccable; the lighting perfect; the score a soaring orchestral piece, that commands the audience to believe what they see.
Yet, behind this meticulously directed production, in the dimly lit wings and dusty backstages, where the real work of ambition is done; a more complex and troubling performance is underway. It is a play of ambition, staged not upon the solid ground of core principle but upon the shifting, creaking sets of political expediency.
This is not a story of bold artistic vision but of strategic rewrites and focus-grouped dialogue. Her narrative is driven, not by the principles she would defend at all costs but by the scenes she is willing to cut when the audience's mood shifts.
This critique ventures beyond the standard review. Pulling back on the curtain, to look at the production itself and to examine the calculated voids in the script. The spaces where conviction should resonate but are instead filled with the hollow echo of a teleprompter and the whispered directions of her political handlers.
Every compelling drama requires a powerful origin story and Sherrill's deliberate stagecraft begins with her military narrative. She speaks her lines with precision, describing herself as "among the flight school graduates in the first class of women eligible for direct assignment to fly combat aircraft;" positioning herself as a pioneering heroine.
The campaign's symbolism: the helicopter and the repeated invocation of service; functions as masterful product placement. By commodifying her military experience, it transforms what should be the foundation of character, into a reusable marketing prop.
Yet from the opening scene, the threads of her carefully woven production is showing signs of unraveling. A plot hole emerges in this pilot. The 1994 cheating scandal at the Naval Academy, represents a scene cut from the official trailer. This is the unseen director's cut, that haunts this carefully managed premiere.
This incident is telling; not for the misconduct itself but for the opaque nature of the deleted scenes and the production's persistent refusal to provide transparency; involved in what has been described as "the largest cheating and honor code scandal, in the history of the United States Navy;" underscores a foundational ambiguity: her simultaneous leveraging and obscuring of her own past.
Sherrill was not accused of cheating but did not walk with her graduating class. A punishment she attributes to failing to report classmates. She has built her entire franchise upon this military backstory; asking voters to accept her version of events, while denying them the complete disciplinary and academic record.
Her Republican adversary, Jack Ciattarelli, has consistently urged her to "release the records," highlighting a fundamental issue in the narrative. The deliberate curation of a life story; emphasizing the heroic parts, while concealing the complexities. This establishes a recurring theme in her professional journey: the strategic use of selective transparency, which has become her political persona.
This foundational ambiguity forces a troubling question about how she genuinely values the currency of military service. The question is magnified into stark relief by her political alliances, particularly her expressed support for Governor Tim Walz. Walz faced a firestorm of allegations, from fellow soldiers who claimed his stories of combat service were embellished; a scenario that brushes against the dark specter of stolen valor.
For a political figure like Sherrill, who has built her public identity upon the bedrock of her own military record, the decision to defend Walz is not merely a partisan alliance; it is a profound character note. It suggests a political calculus where partisan loyalty can supersede a shared commitment to military integrity.
This alignment casts her own meticulously managed narrative in a new, unflattering light; positioning her on the same guilty continuum as Walz; not for crossing the line but for dancing so comfortably along its edge. Sherrill's military narrative reveals a strategic curation, that blurs the lines between honorable service and combat-hero symbolism.
By highlighting her membership in a class "eligible" for combat aircraft; the narrative cleverly implants the image of a fighter pilot or a gunship crewmember, in the minds of the public. However, the specific airframe she operated, the Sikorsky SH-3 Sea King, tells a different story. The Sea King was a venerable workhorse; primarily deployed for critical but supportive missions: anti-submarine warfare; search and rescue and logistics.
This mission profile is fundamentally distinct from the direct, violent engagement of attack aviation. During her era of service, the Army was deploying the formidable AH-64 Apache attack helicopter. A platform designed from the ground up, as a flying tank-killer. Its very name evoking hunter-killer prowess.
The parallel between piloting a Sea King and crewing an Apache, is to conflate two profoundly different realities of military life. The fashion in which Sherrill speaks of her service, loans her the standing of a warrior, without the corresponding crucible. To place her in the same category as Senator Tammy Duckworth (an Army UH-60 Black Hawk pilot, who suffered catastrophic wounds when her aircraft was shot down in a combat assault), is not just an oversimplification; it is an ontological error.
Sherrill's narrative is thus engineered to appropriate the aura of front-line sacrifice, without having endured its life-altering reality. It is a masterclass in political alchemy; transforming respected and dedicated service into the gilded and far more politically potent, stuff of legend.
Choosing a legal career came next. A role strategically selected for its optimal positioning. Following her studies at Georgetown Law, her part as a federal prosecutor in New Jersey, provided instant credibility on law-and-order issues, while skillfully dodging the ideological stereotypes of a progressive or conservative legal figure. This non-ideological positioning reflects, not a lack of principles but a savvy awareness that rigid beliefs can restrict political maneuverability. It is the career path of a tactician, not a true believer.
While her military background may have shaped her image, her tenure in Congress exposes the real essence of her narrative: the troubling nexus between public duty and personal financial gain. As a member of the House Armed Services Committee (a role wielding significant influence over defense policy and procurement), Sherrill engaged in lucrative stock trading, resulting in substantial financial gains publicly estimated at a remarkable $7 million.
This side storyline undeniably raises concerns about profound conflicts of interest. The perception of impropriety deepens with the ensuing repercussions. Reports revealed that she faced fines for breaching federal regulations, regarding undisclosed transactions. When questioned about these actions during a debate, her response was not a robust defense. Instead, it was widely viewed as evasive and lacking accountability, with her claiming that she was "unaware of how she earned the money."
https://www.businessinsider.com/mikie-sherrill-stock-act-congress-ubs-trades-2021-12
https://www.mikiemademillions.com/
"There may be honor among thieves but there's none in politicians."
- T.E. Lawrence, Lawrence of Arabia (1962)
Sherrill's surprising declaration of ignorance, regarding her substantial wealth; was a disconcerting moment - shattering the audience's immersion in her carefully staged narrative, of the conscientious public servant. This single, unscripted episode starkly exposes the troubling void between the sacred responsibilities of public office and the alluring temptation of personal financial gain.
Her repeated, flustered assertions of being uninformed, about millions in profits; serve as a powerful soliloquy that underscores a fundamental disconnection. A performance that should deeply unsettle every voter in the theater. Yet, the domestic stage of stock trades was but a prelude to a grander, more ominous performance; where the stakes were measured not merely in dollars but in the very currency of global sovereignty.
Here, the narrative ascends from the petty corruptions of the bazaar, to the sublime calculus of the chancellery; where the fate of nations is weighed on a banker's scale. Sherrill, with a vote that echoed in the chambers of the Capitol and the trading desks of Zurich; cast her lot for a 2022 funding bill that unleashed a torrent of supplemental military and economic aid to Ukraine.
Her public soliloquy was a masterpiece of high-minded idealism: a sonnet to democracy's defense and the sacred security of the NATO alliance. But this lofty rhetoric; this performance of geopolitical conviction; was shadowed by a subplot of breathtaking confluence. A narrative twist so profound it threatened to unmask the entire production.
For while she spoke of liberty's front lines, her husband (a high-level banker for UBS), was enmeshed in the very architecture of European and global financial stability. A system whose tectonic plates shifted with every artillery shell fired; every pipeline severed; every sovereign bond rated.
UBS, a colossus astride the world's monetary flows; held a vested, monumental stake in the outcome of this conflict. Stability or its controlled unraveling, is the financier's element; the reconstruction of a continent; the debt instruments of a nation reborn; the hedging of currencies in a time of war.
These are the realms where fortunes are forged and financial empires are cemented. The vote to fund the war was not (in this chilling light), a simple act of foreign policy. It was a lever pulled on the world's financial machinery. A decision that directly recalibrated the risk and reward matrices of the very institutions; in which her household was a privileged, insider occupant.
The idealistic statesman and the pragmatic banker; a partnership sanctified in private, now performed a dizzying pantomime on the public stage. One crafting the policy that shaped the market; the other navigating the markets that were shaped by the policy. In this elegant, unspoken symbiosis; the line between a statesman's duty and a household's portfolio dissolved into a gray, profitably ambiguous haze.
The Ukrainian plains became a distant, bloody theater for a domestic drama of influence; where the rhetoric of democracy provided the perfect acoustics for the quiet, accumulating click of a vault. This lack of clarity in financial matters, however, is not a fresh act on the political platform; it is a classic revival. A subplot borrowed from a well-known production in the corporate realm.
"A corrupt society is terrible for humanity and great for business."
- Farhan Akhtar
Sherrill's performance echoes a familiar storyline. One that once held a household name, as its tragic lead: the Martha Stewart saga. This was a masterclass in selective outrage. Stewart's 2004 conviction was not merely for the insider trade itself (the timely sale of ImClone Systems stocks) but for the supporting role she played: conspiracy and obstruction of justice; for lying to federal investigators.
She faced prison for her deceptive performance. A public morality play, designed to convince the audience that justice is fair. The production was a success. It created an enduring archetype of "insider trading," in the public consciousness: the privileged white executive, brought low.
This popular narrative, however, is a form of manufactured malfeasance. The spotlight focuses intently on the corporate suite; creating a compelling but incomplete drama of class warfare. In reality, the flow of non-public information, is a mundane undercurrent in corporate life; where employees at various levels, may share operational news with confidants.
Within any corporation; from the executive suite to the mailroom; non-public information about upcoming products or financial windfalls, often flows through informal networks of employees, family and friends. While technically illegal, this is often portrayed as a widespread (if unprosecuted), practice that lacks the sinister, monolithic intent of the mainstream depiction.
This portrayal frames a complex issue with overly simplistic, socialist-tinged imagery; which facilitates a narrative of the rich getting richer, by unfair advantage and often ignores that investors come from all ethnic and middle-class backgrounds. This manipulated perception, which targets corporate executives, while ignoring the commonplace nature of the act; encourages division and validates class warfare.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it wrongly and applying unsuitable remedies."
- Sir Ernest Benn
The misguided public anger, ignores where true corruption lies; obscuring a far more dangerous truth. The calculus shifts entirely when the stage moves from corporate boardrooms, to the theater of Congress. Here, the transgression evolves from profiting from information asymmetry, to a fundamental corruption of governance itself.
For years, legislators could legally trade stocks in industries they regulated. A practice that government watchdogs decried as legalized insider trading. A privilege unavailable to ordinary citizens and other federal employees. The public outcry led to the landmark STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) of 2012, which explicitly made it illegal for members of Congress and their staff to use non-public information for private profit.
However, its enforcement has been a theatrical failure. With penalties as low as $200 and a reliance on self-policing; the law has fostered a "culture of impunity." A 2023 investigation found that 97 members of Congress violated its disclosure rules, yet none faced meaningful consequences.
The legislation, designed to restore public trust; has instead highlighted a grotesque double standard: Martha Stewart served time for her deception, while members of Congress face a mere slap on the wrist for trading on information that moves markets and shapes national policy. The controversy has not subsided but instead has intensified, into a long-running legislative farce.
Efforts to pass stricter laws have repeatedly failed. With recent attempts like a so-called STOCK Act 2.0 being criticized as a "toothless mess," riddled with loopholes and lacking independent enforcement; effectively allowing members to continue judging their own ethical performances.
The true, undeniable corruption occurs not in corporate breakrooms but in the halls of government. When political leaders engage in stock trading, the problem transcends the mere use of non-public information. These officials are placed in a position where they own parts of companies, that stand to gain or lose from their own legislative and policy decisions.
"Dictators can fix up their entire families in good jobs, in or around government and often do. In democracies, such a practice is frowned upon. Privileged access to the corridors of power through family connections and a kind of old boys' network, is also deemed an abuse of power."
- Jimmy Reid
This creates an intolerable situation where the national interest and a politician's portfolio become dangerously intertwined: a lawmaker who holds stock in a defense contractor, may influence budget allocations; one with investments in a pharmaceutical company may shape healthcare legislation.
The ethical breach for a politician is of a fundamentally different and more dangerous character, than that of a corporate employee. For a sitting member of Congress; the conflict is not merely about personal profit from a tip. It is about being placed in a position, where their public policy decisions; from awarding lucrative government contracts to crafting regulations that shape entire industries; can be directly influenced by their private financial holdings in the very companies they are meant to oversee.
This is not a "manufactured malfeasance;" it is a direct corrosion of governance. This is no longer just about information; it is about the direct manipulation of policy for profit. The "fabricated" outrage over corporate insider trading, pales in comparison to the very real and systemic corruption that occurs when our elected leaders are both the regulators and the beneficiaries.
This is not a theoretical danger. The situation with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse provides a clear case study in ethical ambiguity. As a prominent voice against "dark money," Whitehouse faced allegations of hypocrisy, after an ethics complaint highlighted that he voted for legislation that directed millions in federal grants to the Ocean Conservancy.
A nonprofit that works with and pays his wife. One ethics expert labeled it "the height of hypocrisy," while another stated, "This is corruption, Washington, D.C., style." Such actions reveal a system where, political privilege can shield behavior for which private citizens face severe consequences.
- A Glimpse of Congressional Conflicts -
- The Rio Tinto Land Swap (2013): Lawmakers invested in the mining company: Rio Tinto, voted on a land swap bill, that directly benefited the firm; creating a clear link between their legislative power and personal financial gain.
- The COVID Trades (2020): Several senators, such as Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, faced sharp scrutiny for timely stock trades, following confidential briefings on the looming pandemic. Senator Richard Burr sold $628k-$1.7M in stocks, after confidential COVID-19 briefings in 2020, just before a market crash. He faced no legal consequences.
- The Bank Collapse Trades (2023): Amid the chaos of the Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank collapses; specific members of Congress (notably Representative Earl Blumenauer), were involved in stock sales from local banks, raising suspicions of insider trading.
"A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar."
- H.L. Mencken
The narrative reaches a dangerous climax when these financial conflicts intertwine with national security. A troubling scene exposes that numerous congress members have collaborated and continue to work alongside foreign entities, despite the detrimental impact on the American populace.
https://rumble.com/v6s0njv-boy-meets-world.html
The content discussed in the link provided above, mirrors Senator Bob Menendez's serious situation; where an incumbent senator confronts accusations of serving as a foreign agent: leveraging his position to benefit the governments of Egypt and Qatar, in exchange for personal gain. This goes beyond a mere conflict of interest; it's a betrayal of the nation's soul; where the oath of office is traded for personal profit.
The potential offenses associated with this specific narrative:
- Honest Services Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1346): This law criminalizes schemes aimed at depriving others of the intangible right to honest services. By voting on a bill, directly benefiting a company in which they have ownership; these lawmakers could be perceived as defrauding the public of their right to impartial governance.
- Bribery and Illegal Gratuities (18 U.S.C. § 201): While a direct proof of a quid pro quo arrangement is challenging; a continuous flow of financial benefits from a company, as a result of official actions (such as creating conditions for a monopoly); could be seen as illegal gratuities - essentially a reward for official acts.
- Acting as an Unregistered Foreign Agent (Foreign Agents Registration Act - FARA): This presents a more intricate, innovative argument. If a legislator's decisions, influenced by financial ties to a US enterprise, perfectly align with and actively support a foreign power's strategic interests, one could argue that they are working, albeit indirectly, to push a foreign agenda for their personal gain.
The seriousness of the evidence would likely result in all implicated politicians, to anticipate that these charges are just the beginning of their legal troubles. A thorough investigation would likely expose additional criminal allegations. The realization that individuals tasked with upholding national security, are so often cast in roles that pervert that sacred duty.
"Despotic power is always accompanied by corruption of morality."
- Baron John Dalberg-Acton
To make matters worse, members of armed services committees; responsible for shaping defense policies; hold substantial investments in major defense contractors like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. The financial successes of these companies are directly impacted by the decisions made by these committee members, raising concerns about the integrity of political figures known for their aggressive stance on war.
https://rumble.com/v376wcf-lair-of-the-dragon-war-dogs.html
The aforementioned video, although originally aired on March 24, 2023; delves into a timeless facet of the military establishment. Its most significant insights are unveiled prior to the 5 minutes and 14 seconds mark; providing valuable understanding into the intricacies of geopolitics: the military industry is a profitable enterprise.
"The professional soldiers and sailors don't want to disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot be for limitations of arms."
- Smedley D. Butler
The economic interests prevalent in this sector play a pivotal role in shaping global diplomatic relations. This presents a grim reality, where financial gains often trump the value of human lives. When those responsible for sanctioning wars, also stand to profit from conflict; viewing human lives as mere figures on a financial report; the resulting heartlessness inevitably nurtures animosity; that poses a true threat to the very nation they are meant to safeguard.
https://rumble.com/v70g5kk-green-zone.html
For a comprehensive grasp of the gravity of this issue, the subsequent materials provided are enlightening:
https://rumble.com/v3iuf62-iron-man.html
https://rumble.com/v3cdgbi-home-of-the-brave.html
https://rumble.com/v6zysaq-somewhere-between.html
https://rumble.com/v2e0tkc-white-house-opposes-ceasefire-in-ukraine.html
https://rumble.com/v3mokva-its-all-about-ukraine-money-ep.-2021-10032023.html
"There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket."
- Smedley D. Butler
In this climate, Sherrill's alleged transactions and fines are not an anomaly but part of this long-running serial of ethical ambiguity. Her narrative fits perfectly: a character who portrays herself as a public servant, while engaging in the same lucrative and morally questionable subplots, as the entrenched establishment she claims to challenge.
Her evasive performance, when questioned about her stock profits; follows a familiar script of political privilege. A deep investigation into her record reveals a telling performance: she has not been a vocal champion for stringent congressional stock trading bans. Her silence on this issue, juxtaposed with her personal financial windfall, is a devastating piece of character exposition.
It reveals a politician who; when the cameras are on, speaks of service but when the script calls for action, that would clip her own financial wings; delivers a masterful performance of inaction. The audience is left to wonder: is she a reformer, or merely a new actor, flawlessly reciting the same old, corrosive lines?
"Politics, noun. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage."
- Ambrose Bierce
Her approach to public economics reveals a similar pattern of calculated improvisation. When asked point-blank, to promise she would not raise sales, income or property taxes; Sherrill refused to make such a commitment, stating instead that she "would not commit." In the plain language of the audience, she is leaving the door open for a sequel, where the tax burden on New Jersey families increases.
This refusal takes on greater significance; alongside her record of supporting the Murphy administration's dramatic expansion of state spending (which grew from $35 billion to $59 billion), during his tenure. She has, by all accounts, "rubber-stamped every dime" of this expansion, while offering no substantive plan to curb the escalating cost of living, that drives families from New Jersey.
On immigration, her script contains only blank pages. She has "ducked and weaved, refusing to answer questions on New Jersey's sanctuary-state policies," when confronted in debate settings. This evasion leaves voters without a clear understanding of how she would navigate one of the most contentious issues in governance; suggesting that her positions remain unformed or intentionally obscured.
In this, the most fraught drama of national sovereignty and domestic security; Sherrill's performance ascends from mere evasion to a Shakespearean-grade tragedy of inaction. She has become Hamlet at the gate. Pacing the battlements of policy; soliloquizing endlessly on the theoretical nuances of the issue, yet perpetually paralyzed when the moment demands a decisive thrust.
"To enforce or not to enforce; that is the question," this theatrical performance of indecisiveness, Sherrill excels at portraying the role of unresolved introspection. Instead of acting decisively, her brilliance lies in her inability to make a decision. Through a masterful portrayal of ambiguity, she skillfully hides the void where a spine should be. This theatrical indecision, however, is not a victimless art.
As the Princess dithers, the body count rises. The open-border policy she endorses (albeit indirect); through her evasive behavior, is not a humanitarian aspiration but a harsh experiment, with severe real-life repercussions. It unfolds like a scripted tragedy; with the American populace unknowingly cast as extras and the toll counted in the gradual erosion of their safety, prosperity, and the fundamental rule of law.
- The Tragic Tale of Open Borders -
- In various regions across the country:
https://x.com/TONYxTWO/status/1836875143076802899
https://rumble.com/v70p0dw-illegal-alien-gets-awarded-for-crashing-into-ice-agents.html
Note: The video above provides additional materials in the "show more" section of the video post.
https://rumble.com/v4g4t60-latin-dragon.html
https://rumble.com/v4hpys0-jack-and-the-cuckoo-clock-heart.html
- On a global scale:
https://x.com/BGatesIsaPyscho/status/1836858162743324690
https://x.com/FromKulak/status/1658545111343456259
https://rumble.com/v20s606-lott-analysis-links-high-crime-and-immigration-in-eu-nations.html
The adoption of open border policies by different nations has resulted in adverse outcomes, affecting nations as distant as South Korea and Japan. A recurring trend is evident in every open borders country: the rise in criminal activities, especially those targeting vulnerable groups like children and women.
https://x.com/punishablepress/status/1946198711924580368
https://rumble.com/v4gbgib-60-impact-of-illegals-assaults-and-murders-airman-sets-self-on-fire.html
https://rumble.com/v62bw2w-an-illegal-immigrant-lit-a-woman-on-fire.html
Individuals entering these countries illegally, show little regard for human life and commit heinous acts that deeply unsettle the citizens. Ironically, the promotion of open borders, all fall under the very spectrums of the political left; where they also share a commitment to feminist values.
These groups contradict their feminist principles, as they overlook the increase in criminal behaviors, facilitated by lax border controls. Moreover, nations advocating the defunding the police, have only worsened the security issues in areas with open borders.
- Further Factors to Consider:
https://rumble.com/v4hx07c-birds-of-a-feather.html
This pattern of narrative vagueness, is a directorial choice borrowed from a modern political playbook; one whose most celebrated production was the presidency of Barack Obama. As a candidate, Obama masterfully directed a campaign that presented him as a post-partisan unifier. However, his voting record in the Illinois State Senate, particularly his repeated "present" votes, on controversial legislation; revealed a politician skilled at avoiding clear positions.
The recap of 44:
https://rumble.com/v70d442-he-who-dares.html
https://rumble.com/v70d578-the-big-i-am.html
Sherrill's political masquerade reveals a significant gap between the image she portrays to the public, versus the actual substance behind it. She exploits the fact that most voters do not delve deep into the details of her track record. Her deliberate vagueness of her political persona in Congress, where she was a member of both the moderate New Democrat Coalition and the conservative-leaning Blue Dog Coalition.
Doing so, further perpetuated an image of an independent but centrist politician. Her departure from the Blue Dog Coalition, signifies more than just a change in political allegiance; it signifies a shift in the narrative; an alignment with her true beliefs. Despite Sherrill's portrayal of herself as a moderate leader, her voting history paints a different picture.
Her consistent positioning of agreement and support with President Joe Biden and Governor Murphy, indicates a tendency to vote along party lines; contradicting the notion of independence she projects. This politically ambiguous figure that she portrays, reached a crescendo during the recent government shutdown.
A crisis she helped author, yet from which she was conspicuously absent. Despite paralyzing the federal government and furloughing thousands of New Jerseyans, Sherrill is not on the front lines in Washington, fighting for a resolution. Instead, she was physically absent from the Capitol; a testament to her priorities.
Her campaign for governor provided the convenient alibi, yet the stark reality remains: during a monumental failure of governance (which she helped orchestrate), she was missing in action. She voted with her party to trigger the shutdown, yet was not present in Washington to vote for the series of failed measures to end it. This is not merely a missed vote; it is an abdication of her current office in pursuit of a higher one; which is a dereliction of duty.
https://rumble.com/v70hoxa-ransom.html
On the stage of energy policy, Sherrill's performance is a study in theatrical inadequacy. Confronted with the soaring utility costs that her own support for green mandates helped inflate, her proposed solution: "rate freeze." The plan is so vaporous in its details, that even her party's lead, Governor Murphy, dismissed it as "unworkable."
This policy void is filled only by socialist ideology, captured in her own stunning moralizing: that compliance with such costly measures would "cost you an arm and a leg but if you are a good person, you'll do it." This is not pragmatic governance; it is the language of a moral superior addressing wayward children, a preview of the Marxist condescension that defines her true political disposition.
The trend of implementing expensive, feel-good environmental initiatives; extends further than just the energy sector, delving into a realm of astounding absurdity; exemplified by New Jersey's ban on plastic bags. Initially celebrated as a triumph for the ecosystem, this policy has instead paradoxically led to a surge in the use of heavier, reusable plastic bags.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-jerseys-plastic-ban-ban-did-not-work-report-shows
This legislation is a masterpiece of unintended consequences and epitomizes the core of governmental actions under Sherrill's leadership: a showy gesture, designed to garner public praise but upon closer examination, crumbles in the face of reality. Consequently, landfills are now inundated with greater quantities of these bags, exacerbating environmental repercussions.
The ill-fated trajectory of New Jersey's plastic bag prohibition is likely to repeat itself, as efforts towards achieving environmental goals are pursued with unrealistic ideals. Beneath the veneer of moral aspirations, lies a harsh reality; where the themes of ecological savior-fare are performed exclusively by the elite; leaving the audience to foot the bill through reduced incomes and limited choices.
https://rumble.com/v4cz2e6-the-climate-hustle.html
This narrative foreshadows what a Sherrill administration may entail. When a politician views policies as manifestations of personal virtue, the repercussions for the populace are often severe. We do not need to theorize about the outcomes of this hypothetical scenario; we can simply observe analogous scenes playing out in various regions under the guidance of similar policymakers.
https://rumble.com/v4s5uc9-laissez-faire.html
https://rumble.com/v3jft1y-automan.html
https://rumble.com/v4njzeb-angels-in-stardust.html
https://rumble.com/v4vvsnt-elysium.html
"It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance."
- Thomas Sowell
In education, Sherrill has "doubled down on her plan to force 'regionalization,' busing kids out of their neighborhoods," against the preferences of many families who "want strong schools in their own communities." The policy of forced school regionalization, often championed under the banner of equity, collapses under the weight of its own practical contradictions.
It presents a classic case of cognitive dissonance; where the stated goal of building community, is undermined by the very methods employed. The policy mandates the dissolution of community-centered schools, instead placing children on buses for long-distance transport. This logistical undertaking generates a significant and often unacknowledged environmental cost, through increased fuel consumption and vehicle emissions; directly counter to the professed "green" values of its proponents.
Furthermore, the massive expenditure of public and private resources: on transportation, administrative overhead and facility consolidation; represents a profound misallocation of capital that could otherwise be invested in strengthening educational excellence, within existing community schools. If the true objective were to foster a stronger sense of community, the evidence from districts where such programs have been implemented is starkly clear: they often achieve the opposite, eroding the local bonds and parental involvement that are the bedrock of a thriving educational environment.
This is a clear example of social engineering focused on theoretical concepts rather than the practical experiences of families and communities. This common approach in progressive initiatives aims to replace traditional neighborhood schools in the name of fairness, eroding community authority and parental decision-making. It signifies a substantial transfer of influence from families to bureaucratic officials.
https://rumble.com/v6zg9eg-mikie-sherrill-wants-to-force-lgbtq-indoctrination-in-schools.html
Numerous occurrences of similar phenomena have transpired by those holding to the same views as Sherrill.
https://rumble.com/v4n4u3o-the-people-vs.-larry-flynt.html
https://rumble.com/v4mbfgl-the-singing-nun.html
Like so many in her repertoire, she carefully avoids showing the audience the director's cut; the scenes of that isn't shown in theaters, due to the unintended consequences that unfold off-stage.
While her public script is filled with the rhetoric of supporting working families, her actions reveal a steadfast commitment to a singular, top-down approach: the government mandates in facets of life. Her party's push for policies like New Jersey's Senate Bill S1956 reveals a disturbing comfort with state overreach.
This bill would automatically enroll all individuals into the state's vaccine registry, with the option to opt-out. A reversal of the traditional consent model. Most alarmingly, it allows the Commissioner of Health to deny these opt-out requests during a declared health emergency. This is not prudent public health policy; it is the architecture of a surveillance state, a fundamental erosion of bodily autonomy and medical privacy under the guise of crisis.
Sherrill's silence on such measures speaks volumes, suggesting a comfort with the same "nanny state" overreach she employs in education. Sherrill's political career, is not a matter of complex, data-driven governance but a stage for moral posturing and partisan loyalty. Her record, characterized by a perfect voting alignment with the Biden and Murphy administrations, leaves no room for doubt.
When President Biden championed a federal $15 minimum wage and when Governor Murphy successfully enacted a state-level version; Sherrill was not a skeptical legislator weighing economic trade-offs. Instead, she was a reliable vote in the chorus line; endorsing a policy that; while packaged as a moral imperative; functions as a blunt instrument, with predictable collateral damage.
https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2025/10/nj-minimum-wage-to-go-up/
https://rumble.com/v6th9vh-60000-a-year-to-sweep-floors-in-california.html
This alignment is not merely theoretical; it is the operational reality in New Jersey. The state's minimum wage is set to rise to $15.92 per hour, for most employees on January 1, 2026; a nearly 43-cent increase from the previous year. This is part of a deliberate, multi-year trajectory, that began when Governor Murphy took office; raising the wage from $8.60 in 2018.
For Sherrill, this policy represents the perfect fusion of her political identity: it allows for a public performance of economic compassion, while faithfully executing the playbook written by her party's leadership. She has never met a minimum wage increase she wouldn't endorse.
Viewing the complex ecosystem of small businesses; seasonal employers and agricultural sectors not as entities to be understood but as supporting actors, to be managed through extended timelines; with small business wages climbing to $15.23 and agricultural wages to $14.20 on the same January date; on a path to full alignment in the coming years.
This worldview finds its pure expression in her alliances. Her expressed support for New York City's Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani; might appear to some as a paradox for a supposed moderate. Yet, for those charting her course, it is a confirming landmark.
https://rumble.com/v6zqryy-the-entitled.html
This is no more paradoxical than her previous alignment with Governor Tim Walz, amidst his own military narrative scandal.
https://rumble.com/v5hb7lh-why-has-tim-walz-travelled-to-china-over-a-dozen-times.html
These are not anomalies but alignments. Sherrill's entire political choreography is an impersonation of the early Obama campaign playbook; assuming the mantle of a post-partisan hopeful, while preparing a governance script, written by the party's most orthodox auteurs. While the full production of a Governor Sherrill administration remains in pre-production, the dailies and screen tests are alarming.
Another telling scene, in this act of calculated positioning; was her vote on the censure of Representative Rashida Tlaib. In November 2023, the House voted 234-188 to censure Tlaib for "promoting false narratives regarding the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel and for calling for the destruction of the State of Israel."
A formal rebuke centered on Tlaib's use of the "from the river to the sea" slogan; widely understood as a call for Israel's dismantling. Sherrill's decision to vote "Nay," was a moment of profound symbolic alignment. This was more than a policy disagreement; it was a refusal to censure what many see as hateful and destructive rhetoric.
The role the New Jersey Representative has assumed, clearly signifies her genuine loyalties. Once the disguise is shed, it reveals a politician who aligns herself with the extreme factions within her party, rather than the moderate center. Just like Sherrill, the mainstream media also contributes to keeping its audience ignorant about the individuals they promote.
https://rumble.com/v708u32-dark-tourist.html
It leads one to ponder if Sherrill's support for her colleague, Rashida Tlaib goes beyond mere party solidarity. She is able to view Tlaib differently than the general public does. Moreover, her seeking support from Ras Baraka (a follower of Louis Farrakhan, a notorious anti-Semite) and endorsement of Zohran Mamdani (another anti-Semite), raises questions about her own stance on anti-Semitism. Is she morally indifferent to the company she keeps or does she harbor anti-Semitic sentiments herself?
Sherrill's fundamental beliefs account for her silence, in the presence of the more perilous elements within her followers. She has allowed a disturbing level of tolerance for violent language to thrive; particularly exemplified by the motto "Punch More Nazis." This sets the tone for a culture of violent rhetoric, that her campaign implicitly supports.
During a public gathering in Toms River, Sherrill's followers openly displayed signs with the phrase "86 47." This expression is not harmless political jargon. While its defenders argue that it simply means to "get rid of" or "remove" the 47th president, its vagueness gives it its potency. The term "86" carries a well-documented history in military and intelligence circles, meaning to terminate or kill.
This fact was recognized immediately by former President Trump and his followers. For Sherrill's supporters to wield this phrase, is to tread a fine line in political dialogue. Toying with the insinuation of assassination, while veiling themselves with plausible deniability.
This rhetoric coexists with other aggressive sentiments from her audience. This slogan symbolizes a perilous normalcy of political violence. Sherrill's failure to condemn such expressions from her supporters, is a significant reflection of her tacit approval. Her silence towards these violent expressions, exposes a moral distortion that should concern every voter in New Jersey, no matter their political leaning.
The lack of foundational principles in Sherrill's politics is most evident in her tendency to distort movements she disagrees with. Her handling of ideological frameworks, like Christian Nationalism demonstrates a troubling mentality of justifying the end results. This use of propaganda has been, particularly highlighted in recent months - concerning her party.
If a similar misleading characterization were applied to the Democratic Party, labeling the entire organization based on extremist elements like ANTIFA (a small radical group), rational individuals would quickly see such sweeping generalizations as absurd. However, Sherrill's party and its media allies employ this same simplistic reasoning without hesitation.
One of the most harmful aspects of this, is the intentional blending of the broader ideology of Christian Nationalism, with the abhorrent principles of white nationalism. The latter, as identified by sources monitoring extremist movements, is a racial doctrine advocating for a white ethno-state; which contradicts the inclusive, multi-ethnic nature of mainstream Christian beliefs.
To merge the two; associating a movement focused on cultural values, with a movement rooted in racial supremacy, is not merely an oversimplification; it is an intellectual distortion, that contaminates public discourse and undermines any chance of constructive dialogue. Allowing this misrepresentation to persist, is not a display of thoughtful discourse but rather a weaponized form of ignorance; used to marginalize opposing viewpoints by association rather than reasoned debate.
https://rumble.com/v406rk7-an-american-haunting.html
An objective examination of the Christian Nationalism movement, reveals a vastly different perspective. Contrary to what critics assert, Christian Nationalism is not a push for a theocratic imposition of religious laws. Instead, it embodies:
- Cultural Foundation: The foundational belief that the United States thrived on Judeo-Christian principles, serving as the cornerstone for its historical prosperity and ethical clarity.
- Protective Ethos: A movement to protect and restore those founding principles in the public square, which its adherents believe are under sustained assault by secular progressive ideologies.
- Civic Responsibility: The strong conviction that individuals with faith have a duty to actively partake in civic affairs, serving as a guiding influence and upholding their principles through democratic means.
Attempting to oversimplify the diverse Christian political involvement, into mere "nationalism," overlooks the intricacies of both theology and history. The internal struggle within the faith, does not lie between a desire for a theocratic rule and a withdrawal from societal matters but rather between differing perspectives on divine authority and human accountability.
"The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human."
- Aldous Huxley
This tension mirrors the everlasting discussion between free will and predestination. It is not a division between orthodox beliefs and heresy but a profound disagreement among devout followers on how to embody the core teachings of their faith.
https://rumble.com/v6z5ta4-tenderness-of-the-wolves.html
Perhaps the most revealing example of her political flexibility, emerged in her handling of the Charlie Kirk resolution. She voted for the measure condemning the assassination of the conservative commentator, only to then "trash him in a press release, hours later." This two-step, symbolic gesture, followed by ideological reassurance; exemplifies the modern political calculus, where one can appeal to the center with a vote, while signaling to the base with subsequent rhetoric.
The escalating violence witnessed throughout the United States, is the dangerous culmination of a movement that thrives on dehumanization. This culture labels its adversaries as "fascists" and "Nazis," deeming them deserving of elimination. The rhetoric, which has transcended online spaces, now poses a real-world threat with deadly intentions.
https://rumble.com/v6zqwve-imaginary-friend.html
Sections of the left-wing community not only failed to denounce the violence but also actively promoted it. On various social media channels, hashtags celebrating such violence gained popularity. The deliberate manipulation of language by media and political leaders reflects the consequences of years of divisive rhetoric that demonizes a significant portion of the population as deplorables.
"Any politician who can be elected only by turning Americans against other Americans is too dangerous to be elected."
- Thomas Sowell
This underscores the power of influential individuals' words, which when planted in susceptible minds, can germinate into a harvest of appalling violence and societal chaos. A leader worthy of office would understand that "You can't fight for such ideas, for a society's very soul, with your fists. We fight for this vision at the ballot box."
Beyond questions of character and policy, lies the fundamental matter of diligence: the day-to-day work of representation. Here, the record reveals a startling pattern of absence, that belies her public commitment to service. This absenteeism has escalated dramatically during her gubernatorial campaign.
Public tracking data indicates that in a crucial period of legislative activity,from late July to mid-September 2025,she missed 55 of 63 roll call votes (representing a 87% absence rate). This suggests that the demands of campaigning have taken precedence over her congressional duties; leaving her constituents effectively without representation, during key legislative decisions.
This instrumental approach to representation; treating a current office as a stepping stone, rather than a responsibility; reveals a careerist orientation, that privileges ambition over service. It completes the portrait of a politician, for whom the trappings of power matter more than its responsible exercise.
The concerns about Sherrill's character and tactics are magnified by the very real and documented vulnerabilities in New Jersey's election system; a system she seeks to lead. For citizens concerned about election security, the assurance of a federal Election Security Coordination Task Force, provides little comfort in the face of proven, localized corruption and machine failures.
https://electionfraud.heritage.org/
The documented failures demand more than a reactive partnership; they require a fundamental reinforcement of the system's integrity. The federal framework exists. The Election Security Coordination Task Force; a partnership between state and federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI; is designed to protect election infrastructure.
Furthermore, the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Jersey maintains a dedicated hotline for reporting federal election crimes; demonstrating a pathway for accountability. However, this framework is clearly failing to prevent significant breaches, as evidenced by two critical areas of concern:
- Criminal Mail-In Ballot Fraud: The case of Craig Callaway, a political organizer and former President of the Atlantic City Council, is a stark example. Callaway was sentenced to 24 months in prison for a scheme in which he paid individuals $30 to $50, to act as unauthorized messengers to procure and cast fraudulent mail-in ballots for the 2022 general election.
These ballots were cast in the names of voters who confirmed they "did not vote in the 2022 General Election and that they did not authorize Callaway, his subordinates or anyone else, to cast ballots for them." Many of these fraudulent ballots were counted. This is not a hypothetical threat; it is a successfully executed criminal conspiracy that corrupted an election's outcome.
- Non-Citizen Voting: Further eroding trust in the system; a New Jersey woman, Emily Custodio, was charged with voter fraud, for falsely claiming she was a U.S. citizen. Custodio, a citizen of the Philippines, registered and voted in the 2020 general election in Philadelphia. This case highlights vulnerabilities in the registration system that allow ineligible votes to dilute the voices of lawful American citizens.
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/illegal-aliens-are-still-voting-our-elections
- Voting Machine Vulnerabilities: Concerns persist, regarding the reliability and impartiality of voting technology, with instances alleged where machines appeared to malfunction in ways that disadvantaged specific candidates.
This pattern of failure, from criminal conspiracies to systemic loopholes; paints a picture of an electoral process in dire need of scrutiny and strengthening. The existing federal task force (while a formal structure), has not prevented these breaches, suggesting a need for more proactive and rigorous oversight.
https://rumble.com/v4f4zb0-new-jersey-county-sues-dominion-voting-systems.html
In a classic case of political gaslighting, the Democratic party claims there's no need to worry about election security, while simultaneously having screamed about Russian collusion between that nation and the Trump administration (claims that have been debunked for several years). The evidence of criminal activity exists and those caught have been part of the party that claims there should be no concern.
In a classic case of political gaslighting, the Democratic party claims there's no need to worry about election security, while simultaneously having screamed about Russian collusion between that nation and the Trump administration (claims that have been debunked for several years). The evidence of criminal activity exists and those caught have been part of the party that claims there should be no concern.
With the real and documented threats to election integrity providing a vital roadmap for voters, this is no longer merely a choice between candidates; it is a test of the electorate's commitment to preserving the foundational principles of transparent and accountable government.
To ensure this information achieves maximum impact, citizens can demand federal action on election security. The documented cases of fraud in New Jersey provide powerful justification to contact the President and demand the use of all available resources to monitor all election-related activities in New Jersey; from the start of early voting until the last ballot is counted and all county elections activities are certified.
Utilizing traditional mail services in addition to digital communication, enhances the likelihood of eliciting the desired responses and actions from your elected officials. To reach the President by this means:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
The first link, is where he seems to be the most active.
https://rumble.com/c/ilDonaldoTrumpo
https://rumble.com/c/whitehouse
https://youtube.com/@whitehouse
Sharing any of the web addresses below, will help recognize the need for such actions.
https://rumble.com/v4f4zb0-new-jersey-county-sues-dominion-voting-systems.html
https://electionfraud.heritage.org/
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/illegal-aliens-are-still-voting-our-elections
- The Choice Before New Jersey -
Mikie Sherrill represents a particular species of modern political figure: one whose aesthetic of competence, masks a reality of calculation; whose rhetoric of service conceals a pattern of self-interest; whose performance of principle belies a practice of convenience. She is not an anomaly but an archetype: the product of a political system that rewards narrative over substance, ambition over integrity and flexibility over conviction.
New Jersey stands at a crossroads, facing very real challenges of affordability, education and governance. The question before its voters is not merely about policy preferences but about the very character of leadership they will endorse. Will they choose the carefully constructed persona; the master of political ambiguity; the candidate who refuses to be pinned down? Or will they seek leadership grounded in transparency, consistency and unwavering commitment to principle rather than party?
Sherrill's record suggests a fundamental truth: political talent should not be confused with political character. She has demonstrated considerable skill in navigating the currents of political advancement but has she demonstrated the moral compass necessary for genuine leadership? The evidence suggests she has not.
In the end, the polished performance cannot forever conceal the hollowness within; the absence of a core philosophical foundation, that would enable her to transcend political calculation and serve something greater than her own advancement. For New Jersey, the risk is not merely a continuation of current policies but the validation of a political style, that elevates ambition over integrity and calculation over conviction.
- Resources:
- The Call to Action -
For every person around the world, American and or otherwise...the patterns in Mikie Sherrill's career represent more than a political case study; they constitute a civic emergency. The detailed record of her evolution, from a figure of purported integrity, to a candidate enmeshed in controversy; provides a vital roadmap for voters navigating the fog of political marketing.
The urgency of this moment demands more than passive observation; it requires active participation in the production. By sharing every article and video; one effectively amplifies these substantiated concerns, where the biased media cannot control the message shared. By elevating any of the resources below by sharing it with others, knowledge is passed on but a larger audience is created as such activity generates online recognition by make these resources go viral.
- Resources:
- Jack Ciattarelli: Opponent not seeking to weaken American values or divide America, helping his campaign, helps not just New Jersey but helps in making a better America. His website:
- Scott Presler is America's leading conservative activist. Well known in Republican circles due to his success rate in flipping areas to be conservative.
- Conservative news outlet for New Jersey:
"Our cause is the cause of all mankind and that we are fighting for their liberty in defending our own."
- Benjamin Franklin
In conclusion, for those who value this channel and desire to make a positive impact, the most impactful gesture is through prayer. Offering prayers for the well-being of this channel is a sincere and meaningful way to contribute.
In consideration of the presence of various officials and supporters of the Woke movement, the identity of the operator behind this communication will remain undisclosed. Nevertheless, individuals are encouraged to offer prayers for "the individual managing the channel, Blue Enigma zero-one." Your intentions will be recognized by God.
"If everything around you seems dark, look again, you may be the light."
- Rumi
Addendum: Within the "Supplemental Material" section (situated beneath the date of the video post, the number of views and assigned tags); there lies a treasure trove of valuable content waiting to be discovered. This segment frequently comprises an abundance of extra information and resources.
Exploring this segment could prove to be advantageous in obtaining deeper insights. The purpose of this detailed explanation, is to accommodate the varied terminology used by different individuals; which can sometimes make it challenging to locate the desired content.
(LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE FOR USER-GENERATED CONTENT PLATFORM:
1. FAIR USE NOTICE UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW
All audiovisual materials, excerpts or derivative content (collectively, "Third-Party Content") displayed on this channel are utilized STRICTLY PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 107 (Copyright Act of 1976). Such use is confined to:
- (a) Criticism, commentary and educational analysis;
- (b) Historical documentation and scholarly research;
- (c) Transformative repurposing that adds new meaning, context or insight distinct from the original work.
This channel does not claim ownership over Third-Party Content. Any copyright-related inquiries must be directed to the rights holder(s) pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(c).
2. ABSOLUTE NON-ENDORSEMENT CLAUSE
- Persons & Entities: Mention, depiction or reference to any individual, organization, political group or entity (including hyperlinks in descriptions) DOES NOT CONSTITUTE endorsement, affiliation, sponsorship or approval by this channel.
- Platform Liability: Rumble Inc. and its affiliates are EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED from responsibility for this channel's content under 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1).
- Viewer Interpretation: All analysis, conclusions or narratives presented are solely those of the channel operator and DO NOT REFLECT the views of creators of Third-Party Content.
3. RELIGIOUS, SYMBOLIC & AESTHETIC CONTENT
Use of religious iconography, political symbols or cultural imagery serves EXCLUSIVELY for:
- (a) Academic analysis of sociopolitical movements;
- (b) Visual contextualization of subject matter;
- (c) Satirical or critical commentary protected under *Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,* 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
*USAGE DOES NOT IMPLY PROMOTION OF/AFFILIATION WITH any faith, ideology or institution.
4. PROHIBITION ON CONTENT REUSE
EXPLICIT RESTRICTIONS:
- Third-Party Content is NOT LICENSED for redistribution, commercial exploitation or derivative use by viewers.
- Written commentary by the operator is permitted for citation under fair use only if:
(i)
-
LIVE
SpartakusLIVE
1 hour agoNEW - REDSEC Battle Royale || The Duke of Nuke CONQUERS ALL
226 watching -
LIVE
Mally_Mouse
9 hours ago📣Telescreen Talks - LIVE!
216 watching -
LIVE
Quite Frankly
5 hours agoAggressive Texting, Practice Citizenship Test, Fed vs Fed | 10/29/25
622 watching -
LIVE
Blabs Games
39 minutes agoLet's Get Funky - Jurassic World Evolution 3 Stream #2
11 watching -
LIVE
Putther
10 minutes ago🔴BILLY ANDERSON RETURNS!
11 watching -
LIVE
The Mike Schwartz Show
2 hours agoTHE MIKE SCHWARTZ SHOW Evening Edition 10-29-2025
3,789 watching -
LIVE
SavageJayGatsby
2 hours ago📣Telescreen Talks - LIVE!
47 watching -
LIVE
Reidboyy
5 hours agoI found the BEST Controller Settings for RedSec
43 watching -
LIVE
Phyxicx
2 hours agoStuff and Things - 10/27/2025
94 watching -
LIVE
Rah_Gaming
45 minutes agoEnd Of The Resident Evil Marathon Tonight!
13 watching