Bad Teacher
~ Supplemental Material ~
"When politics is no longer a mission but a profession, politicians become more self-serving than public servants."
- Emmanuel Macron
In the grand theater of American politics, where perception is the currency and narrative, the script; Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill has proven herself a virtuoso of persona. She presents a meticulously curated portfolio of American virtues: the naval officer, the federal prosecutor, the mother. This is not a life lived but a role performed.
A role crafted with the precision of a Hollywood studio; to project unassailable integrity. A biographical narrative, polished to cinematic gloss, for public consumption. The stagecraft is impeccable, the lighting perfect. The score is soaring and the audience is told to believe what they see.
Yet, behind this meticulously directed production; in the dimly lit wings and dusty backstages; a more complex and troubling production is underway: a performance of ambition. This is not a story of bold artistic vision but of strategic rewrites and focus-grouped dialogue. Her narrative is not driven by the principles she would defend at all costs but by the scenes she is willing to cut, when the audience's mood shifts.
This critique ventures beyond the standard review; to pull back the curtain on the production itself; to examine the calculated voids in the script. The spaces where conviction should resonate but are instead filled with the hollow echo of a teleprompter and the whispered directions of her political handlers.
Every compelling drama requires a powerful origin story and Sherrill's deliberate stagecraft begins with her military narrative. She speaks her lines with precision, describing herself as "among the flight school graduates in the first class of women eligible for direct assignment to fly combat aircraft;" positioning herself as a pioneering heroine.
The campaign's symbolism: the helicopter and the repeated invocation of service; functions as masterful product placement. By commodifying her military experience, it transforms what should be the foundation of character, into a reusable marketing prop.
Yet from the opening scene, the threads of her carefully woven production is showing signs of unraveling. A plot hole emerges in this pilot. The 1994 cheating scandal at the Naval Academy, represents a scene cut from the official trailer. This is the unseen director's cut, that haunts this carefully managed premiere.
This incident is telling; not for the misconduct itself but for the opaque nature of the deleted scenes and the production's persistent refusal to provide transparency; involved in what has been described as "the largest cheating and honor code scandal, in the history of the United States Navy;" underscores a foundational ambiguity: her simultaneous leveraging and obscuring of her own past.
Sherrill was not accused of cheating but did not walk with her graduating class. A punishment she attributes to failing to report classmates. She has built her entire franchise upon this military backstory; asking voters to accept her version of events, while denying them the complete disciplinary and academic record.
Her Republican adversary, Jack Ciattarelli, has consistently urged her to "release the records," highlighting a fundamental issue in the narrative. The deliberate curation of a life story; emphasizing the heroic parts, while concealing the complexities. This establishes a recurring theme in her professional journey: the strategic use of selective transparency, which has become her political persona.
Choosing a legal career came next; strategically selected for its positioning. Following her studies at Georgetown Law; her role as a federal prosecutor, in New Jersey; provided instant credibility, on matters relating to law and order. Skillfully dodging the ideological stereotypes of a progressive or conservative legal figure.
This pragmatic positioning reflects, not a lack of principles but rather a savvy awareness that, rigid beliefs can restrict political maneuverability. While her military background may have shaped her image, her tenure in Congress exposes the real essence of her narrative: the troubling nexus between public duty and personal financial gain.
As a member of the House Armed Services Committee (a role wielding significant influence over defense policies and acquisitions), Sherrill was found to have engaged in lucrative stock trading on the side, resulting in substantial financial gains; publicly estimated at a remarkable $7 million. This side storyline undeniably raises concerns about conflicts of interest.
The perception of impropriety, deepened with the ensuing repercussions. Reports revealed that she faced fines for breaching federal regulations regarding undisclosed transactions. When questioned about these actions during a debate, her response was not a robust defense. Instead, it was widely viewed as evasive and lacking accountability, with her claiming that she is "unaware of how she earned the money."
https://www.businessinsider.com/mikie-sherrill-stock-act-congress-ubs-trades-2021-12
https://www.mikiemademillions.com/
"There may be honor among thieves but there's none in politicians."
- T.E. Lawrence, Lawrence of Arabia (1962)
Sherrill's surprising declaration of ignorance, regarding her substantial wealth; was a disconcerting moment, shattering the audience's immersion in her carefully staged narrative of the conscientious public servant. This single, unscripted episode starkly exposes the troubling void between the sacred responsibilities of public office and the alluring temptation of personal financial gain.
Her repeated, flustered assertions of being uninformed about millions in profits serve as a powerful soliloquy that underscores a fundamental disconnection, a performance that should deeply unsettle every voter in the theater. This lack of clarity in financial matters, however, is not a fresh act on the political platform; it is a classic revival, a subplot borrowed from a well-known production in the corporate realm.
Her performance echoes a familiar storyline, one that once held a household name as its tragic lead: the Martha Stewart saga. This was a masterclass in selective outrage. Her 2004 conviction was not merely for the insider trade itself (the timely sale of ImClone Systems stocks) but for the supporting role she played: conspiracy and obstruction of justice, for lying to federal investigators.
She faced prison for her deceptive performance; a public morality play designed to convince the audience that justice is fair. The production was a success; it created an enduring archetype of "insider trading" in the public consciousness: the privileged white executive, brought low.
This popular narrative, however, is a form of manufactured malfeasance. The spotlight focuses intently on the corporate suite, creating a compelling but incomplete drama of class warfare. In reality, the flow of non-public information is a mundane undercurrent in corporate life, where employees at various levels may share operational news with confidants.
Within any corporation, from the executive suite to the mailroom, non-public information, about upcoming products or financial windfalls, often flows through informal networks of employees, family and friends. While technically illegal, this is often portrayed as a widespread, if unprosecuted, practice that lacks the sinister, monolithic intent of the mainstream depiction.
This portrayal frames a complex issue with overly simplistic, socialist-tinged imagery, which facilitates a narrative of the rich getting richer, by unfair advantage and often ignoring that investors come from all ethnic and middle-class backgrounds. This manipulated perception, which targets corporate executives, while ignoring the commonplace nature of the act; encourages division and validates class warfare.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it wrongly and applying unsuitable remedies."
- Sir Ernest Benn
The misguided public anger, ignores where true corruption lies; obscuring a far more dangerous truth. The calculus shifts entirely when the stage moves from corporate boardrooms to the theater of Congress. Here, the transgression evolves from profiting from information asymmetry to a fundamental corruption of governance itself.
For years, legislators could legally trade stocks in industries they regulated, a practice that government watchdogs decried as legalized insider trading. A privilege unavailable to the ordinary citizens and other federal employees. The public outcry led to the landmark STOCK Act (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) of 2012, which explicitly made it illegal for members of Congress and their staff to use non-public information for private profit.
However, its enforcement has been a theatrical failure. With penalties as low as $200 and a reliance on self-policing, the law has fostered a "culture of impunity." A 2023 investigation found that 97 members of Congress violated its disclosure rules, yet none faced meaningful consequences.
The legislation, designed to restore public trust, has instead highlighted a grotesque double standard: Martha Stewart served time for her deception, while members of Congress face a mere slap on the wrist for trading on information that moves markets and shapes national policy.
The controversy has not subsided; it has intensified into a long-running legislative farce. Efforts to pass stricter laws have repeatedly failed, with recent attempts like a so-called STOCK Act 2.0 being criticized as a "toothless mess," riddled with loopholes and lacking independent enforcement, effectively allowing members to continue judging their own ethical performances.
The true, undeniable corruption occurs not in corporate breakrooms, but in the halls of government. When political leaders engage in stock trading, the problem transcends the mere use of non-public information. These officials are placed in a position where they own parts of companies that stand to gain or lose from their own legislative and policy decisions.
This creates an intolerable situation: a lawmaker who holds stock in a defense contractor may influence budget allocations; one with investments in a pharmaceutical company may shape healthcare legislation. A member of a banking committee can trade stocks right after a private briefing on a looming financial crisis . This creates an intolerable situation where the national interest and a politician's portfolio become dangerously intertwined.
The ethical breach for a politician, is of a fundamentally different and more dangerous character than that of a corporate employee. For a sitting member of Congress, the conflict is not merely about personal profit from a tip. It is about being placed in a position where their public policy decisions; from awarding lucrative government contracts to crafting regulations, that shape entire industries; can be directly influenced by their private financial holdings, in the very companies they are meant to oversee.
This is not a "manufactured malfeasance," it is a direct corrosion of governance. This is no longer just about information; it is about the direct manipulation of policy for profit. The "fabricated" outrage over corporate insider trading, pales in comparison to the very real and systemic corruption that occurs, when our elected leaders are both the regulators and the beneficiaries.
This is not a theoretical danger. The situation with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse provides a clear case study in ethical ambiguity. As a prominent voice against "dark money," Whitehouse faced allegations of hypocrisy after an ethics complaint highlighted he voted for legislation that directed millions in federal grants to the Ocean Conservancy, a nonprofit that works with and pays his wife.
One ethics specialist criticized it as "the pinnacle of hypocrisy," while another described it as "corruption, D.C. style." These actions shed light on a system, where political elites can evade consequences for conduct that would severely impact average citizens. The subsequent list offers a concise overview of other notable occurrences in this ongoing drama of ethical uncertainty:
- The COVID Trades (2020): Several senators, such as Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, faced sharp scrutiny for timely stock trades following confidential briefings on the looming pandemic.
- The Bank Collapse Trades (2023): Amid the chaos of the Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank collapses, specific members of Congress; notably Representative Earl Blumenauer; were involved in stock sales from local banks; raising suspicions of insider trading.
The narrative reaches a dangerous climax when these financial conflicts intertwine with national security. A troubling scene exposes that numerous congress members have collaborated and continue to work alongside foreign entities, despite the detrimental impact on the American populace.
https://rumble.com/v6s0njv-boy-meets-world.html
The content discussed in the link provided above, mirrors Senator Bob Menendez's serious situation, where an incumbent senator confronts accusations of serving as a foreign agent: leveraging his position to benefit the governments of Egypt and Qatar, in exchange for personal gain. This goes beyond a mere conflict of interest; it's a betrayal of the nation's soul; where the oath of office is traded for personal profit.
The potential offenses associated with this specific narrative:
- Honest Services Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1346): This law criminalizes schemes aimed at depriving others of the intangible right to honest services. By voting on a bill, directly benefiting a company in which they have ownership; these lawmakers could be perceived as defrauding the public of their right to impartial governance.
- Bribery and Illegal Gratuities (18 U.S.C. § 201): While a direct proof of a quid pro quo arrangement is challenging; a continuous flow of financial benefits from a company, as a result of official actions (such as creating conditions for a monopoly); could be seen as illegal gratuities - essentially a reward for official acts.
- Acting as an Unregistered Foreign Agent (Foreign Agents Registration Act - FARA): This presents a more intricate, innovative argument. If a legislator's decisions, influenced by financial ties to a US enterprise, perfectly align with and actively support a foreign power's strategic interests, one could argue that they are working, albeit indirectly, to push a foreign agenda for their personal gain.
The gravity of what is documented concerning this case; would have all the various politicians involved; see these charges being the very least of what they would be facing. A credible investigation would lay bare further criminal charges.
The seriousness of the evidence would likely result in all implicated politicians, to anticipate that these charges are just the beginning of their legal troubles. A thorough investigation would likely expose additional criminal allegations. The realization that individuals tasked with upholding national security, are so often cast in roles that pervert that sacred duty.
To make matters worse, members of armed services committees; responsible for shaping defense policies; hold substantial investments in major defense contractors like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. The financial successes of these companies are directly impacted by the decisions made by these committee members, raising concerns about the integrity of political figures known for their aggressive stance on war.
https://rumble.com/v376wcf-lair-of-the-dragon-war-dogs.html
The aforementioned video, although originally aired on March 24, 2023; delves into a timeless facet of the military establishment. Its most significant insights are unveiled prior to the 5 minutes and 14 seconds mark; providing valuable understanding into the intricacies of geopolitics: the military industry is a profitable enterprise.
"The professional soldiers and sailors don't want to disarm. No admiral wants to be without a ship. No general wants to be without a command. Both mean men without jobs. They are not for disarmament. They cannot be for limitations of arms."
- Smedley D. Butler
The economic interests prevalent in this sector play a pivotal role in shaping global diplomatic relations. This presents a grim reality, where financial gains often trump the value of human lives. When those responsible for sanctioning wars, also stand to profit from conflict; viewing human lives as mere figures on a financial report; the resulting heartlessness inevitably nurtures animosity; that poses a true threat to the very nation they are meant to safeguard.
For a comprehensive grasp of the gravity of this issue, the subsequent materials provided are enlightening:
https://rumble.com/v3iuf62-iron-man.html
https://rumble.com/v3cdgbi-home-of-the-brave.html
https://rumble.com/v6zysaq-somewhere-between.html
https://rumble.com/v2e0tkc-white-house-opposes-ceasefire-in-ukraine.html
https://rumble.com/v3mokva-its-all-about-ukraine-money-ep.-2021-10032023.html
"There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket."
- Smedley D. Butler
In this climate, Sherrill’s alleged transactions and fine are not an anomaly but part of this long-running serial of ethical ambiguity. Her narrative fits perfectly: a character who portrays herself as a public servant while engaging in the same lucrative, morally questionable subplots as the entrenched establishment she claims to challenge.
Her evasive performance when questioned about her stock profits follows a familiar script of political privilege. A deep investigation into her record reveals a telling performance: she has NOT been a vocal champion for stringent congressional stock trading bans. Her silence on this issue, juxtaposed with her personal financial windfall, is a devastating piece of character exposition.
It reveals a politician who, when the cameras are on, speaks of service, but when the script calls for action that would clip her own financial wings, delivers a masterful performance of inaction. The audience is left to wonder: is she a reformer, or merely a new actor, flawlessly reciting the same old, corrosive lines?
Her approach to public economics reveals a similar pattern of calculated improvisation. When asked point-blank to promise she would not raise sales, income or property taxes; Sherrill refused to make such a commitment, stating instead that she "would not commit." In the plain language of the audience, she is leaving the door open for a sequel, where the tax burden on New Jersey families increases.
This refusal takes on greater significance when viewed alongside her record of supporting the Murphy administration's dramatic expansion of state spending; which grew from $35 billion to $59 billion, during his tenure. She has, by all accounts, "rubber-stamped every dime" of this expansion, while offering no substantive plan to curb the escalating cost of living that drives families from New Jersey.
On immigration, her script contains only blank pages. She has "ducked and weaved, refusing to answer questions on New Jersey's sanctuary-state policies," when confronted in debate settings. This evasion leaves voters without a clear understanding of how she would navigate one of the most contentious issues in governance. Suggesting that her positions remain unformed or intentionally obscured.
This pattern of narrative vagueness is a directorial choice borrowed from a modern political playbook, one whose most celebrated production was the presidency of Barack Obama. As a candidate, Obama masterfully directed a campaign that presented him as a post-partisan unifier.
However, his voting record in the Illinois State Senate; particularly his repeated "present" votes on controversial legislation; revealed a politician skilled at avoiding clear positions. This ambiguity continued during his presidential campaign; where his rhetoric of unity, often contrasted with his actual record.
Sherrill's political trajectory demonstrates a similar chasm between marketed image and underlying substance; relying on voter inattention to the details of an actual record. As with the former President, where conservative analysts were able to unmask his rhetoric and expose Obama's true agenda; the same is true with Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill.
Her calculated ambiguity extends to her political identity in Congress, where she joined both the moderate New Democrat Coalition and the conservative-leaning Blue Dog Coalition, before eventually leaving the latter. This departure from the Blue Dogs represents more than a simple change of affiliation; it is her direction of the narrative creating a centrist politician that's independent.
With this initial appearance of independence, followed by eventual alignment with party orthodoxy; she presents herself as a moderate but her voting record tells a different story. She has "voted with President Joe Biden and Murphy every single time;" suggesting a reliable party vote behind the rhetoric of independence.
On energy, her proposed solution to soaring utility costs, a "rate freeze." Her plan was described as so lacking in detail, that even Governor Murphy himself considered it "unworkable." Meanwhile, she previously supported the very green mandates that contributed to these rising costs. Her moralizing tone, that compliance would "cost you an arm and a leg but if you are a good person, you'll do it," reveals a socialist worldview.
This should come as no surprise, considering her expressed support for New York City's Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani. It is a telling preview of the political disposition New Jersey residents can expect should she win.
https://rumble.com/v6zqryy-the-entitled.html
In education, she has "doubled down on her plan to force 'regionalization,' busing kids out of their neighborhoods," against the preferences of many families, who "want strong schools in their own communities." This top-down approach to educational policy, demonstrates a preference for ideological solutions over community-based approaches. Prioritizing abstract concepts of equity over parental choice and local control.
The lack of principled foundation in Sherrill's politics is perhaps most clearly illustrated by her and her party's approach to cultural issues, particularly the mischaracterization of movements they oppose. The manner in which she addresses complex ideological frameworks like Christian Nationalism reveals a troubling pattern of intellectual superficiality.
Rather than engaging with the substantive philosophical foundations of this worldview, she parrots her party's reductive characterization, vilifying a diverse movement to marginalize it from civil discourse. This approach represents either a calculated political maneuver or a concerning failure of intellectual rigor; both disqualifying for someone aspiring to executive leadership.
If the same specious characterization were applied to the Democratic Party, where extremist elements like ANTIFA (a minority fringe group), defined the entire organization; reasonable people would recognize such generalization as ludicrous. Yet this mischaracterization is allowed to run rampant within Sherrill's political party and their media allies, who have demonstrated consistent left-wing bias.
Christian Nationalism is not (as its critics claim), a theocratic desire to forcibly impose religious law. Instead, it represents:
- A Cultural Foundation: The belief that the United States was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, which are the primary source of its historic prosperity and moral clarity.
- A Protective Ethos: A movement to protect and restore those founding principles in the public square, which its adherents believe are under sustained assault by secular progressive ideologies.
- A Call to Civic Duty: The conviction that people of faith have a responsibility to be actively engaged in civic life, to be a "salt and light" influence; defending their values through democratic processes.
https://rumble.com/v406rk7-an-american-haunting.html
For Sherrill to parrot her party's reductive and inflammatory view of Christian Nationalism is not a sign of thoughtful leadership; it is an act of pure political tribalism that fuels the fires of division. Some may claim "she didn't know" or "wasn't properly informed." Both excuses are unacceptable for someone who purports to be a political leader.
"The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human."
- Aldous Huxley
This is the same political apparatus that infamously characterized destructive urban riots as "peaceful protests," creating a credibility chasm between their narrative and observable reality.
https://rumble.com/v6zsfke-escape-from-safehaven.html
Perhaps the most revealing example of her political flexibility, emerged in her handling of the Charlie Kirk resolution. She voted for the measure condemning the assassination of the conservative commentator, only to then "trash him in a press release, hours later." This two-step, symbolic gesture, followed by ideological reassurance; exemplifies the modern political calculus, where one can appeal to the center with a vote, while signaling to the base with subsequent rhetoric.
This not leadership but political triangulation perfected. A technique that provides deniability across the political spectrum, while committing to nothing substantive. The lack of principled foundation in Sherrill's politics, creates a vacuum where more dangerous elements can flourish. Among her supporters, there has been a growing and disturbing tolerance for violent rhetoric, particularly the slogan "Punch More Nazis."
This is the climate of violent rhetoric that her campaign seems to tacitly endorse. At a public event in Toms River, Sherrill's supporters were observed openly flaunting signs bearing the phrase "86 47." This phrase is not benign political slang. While its defenders claim it merely means to "get rid of" or "remove" the 47th president, its ambiguity is its power.
The term "86" has a well-documented history in military and intelligence circles, of meaning to eliminate or kill. A sinister interpretation that former President Trump and his supporters immediately recognized. For Sherrill's supporters to brandish this phrase, is to dance on the knife's edge of political discourse. Flirting with the suggestion of assassination while hiding behind plausible deniability.
This rhetoric exists alongside other violent sentiments from her base, including the slogan "Punch More Nazis;" a phrase that has been proudly displayed on T-shirts, at progressive political conferences. This slogan represents a dangerous normalization of political violence, one that Harvard political theorist, Danielle Allen has forcefully argued against, stating, "We need to restore a comprehensively shared commitment to nonviolence and clearly repudiate political violence of any kind."
Sherrill's silence in the face of such rhetoric, from her supporters is a profound abdication of leadership. Her failure to repudiate these violent sentiments, reveals a moral cowardice that should alarm every New Jersey voter, regardless of political affiliation. As one analysis notes, "To choose political violence is to choose to disassemble the foundation of a just, stable and peaceful society."
"When you don't take a stand against corruption you tacitly support it."
- Kamal Haasan
The escalating violence witnessed throughout the United States, is the dangerous culmination of a movement that thrives on dehumanization. This culture labels its adversaries as "fascists" and "Nazis," deeming them deserving of elimination. The rhetoric, which has transcended online spaces, now poses a real-world threat with deadly intentions.
https://rumble.com/v6zqwve-imaginary-friend.html
Sections of the left-wing community not only failed to denounce the violence but also actively promoted it. On various social media channels, hashtags celebrating such violence gained popularity. The deliberate manipulation of language by media and political leaders reflects the consequences of years of divisive rhetoric that demonizes a significant portion of the population as deplorables.
"Any politician who can be elected only by turning Americans against other Americans is too dangerous to be elected."
- Thomas Sowell
This underscores the power of influential individuals' words, which when planted in susceptible minds, can germinate into a harvest of appalling violence and societal chaos. A leader worthy of office would understand that "You can't fight for such ideas, for a society's very soul, with your fists. We fight for this vision at the ballot box."
Beyond questions of character and policy, lies the fundamental matter of diligence: the day-to-day work of representation. Here, the record reveals a startling pattern of absence, that belies her public commitment to service. This absenteeism has escalated dramatically during her gubernatorial campaign.
Public tracking data indicates that in a crucial period of legislative activity,from late July to mid-September 2025,she missed 55 of 63 roll call votes (representing a 87% absence rate). This suggests that the demands of campaigning have taken precedence over her congressional duties; leaving her constituents effectively without representation, during key legislative decisions.
This instrumental approach to representation; treating a current office as a stepping stone, rather than a responsibility; reveals a careerist orientation, that privileges ambition over service. It completes the portrait of a politician, for whom the trappings of power matter more than its responsible exercise.
The concerns about Sherrill's character and tactics are magnified by the very real and documented vulnerabilities in New Jersey's election system; a system she seeks to lead. For citizens concerned about election security, the assurance of a federal Election Security Coordination Task Force, provides little comfort in the face of proven, localized corruption and machine failures.
https://electionfraud.heritage.org/
The documented failures demand more than a reactive partnership; they require a fundamental reinforcement of the system's integrity. The federal framework exists. The Election Security Coordination Task Force; a partnership between state and federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI; is designed to protect election infrastructure.
Furthermore, the U.S. Attorney's Office for New Jersey maintains a dedicated hotline for reporting federal election crimes; demonstrating a pathway for accountability. However, this framework is clearly failing to prevent significant breaches, as evidenced by two critical areas of concern:
- Criminal Mail-In Ballot Fraud: The case of Craig Callaway, a political organizer and former President of the Atlantic City Council, is a stark example. Callaway was sentenced to 24 months in prison for a scheme in which he paid individuals $30 to $50, to act as unauthorized messengers to procure and cast fraudulent mail-in ballots for the 2022 general election.
These ballots were cast in the names of voters who confirmed they "did not vote in the 2022 General Election and that they did not authorize Callaway, his subordinates or anyone else, to cast ballots for them." Many of these fraudulent ballots were counted. This is not a hypothetical threat; it is a successfully executed criminal conspiracy that corrupted an election's outcome.
- Non-Citizen Voting: Further eroding trust in the system; a New Jersey woman, Emily Custodio, was charged with voter fraud, for falsely claiming she was a U.S. citizen. Custodio, a citizen of the Philippines, registered and voted in the 2020 general election in Philadelphia. This case highlights vulnerabilities in the registration system that allow ineligible votes to dilute the voices of lawful American citizens.
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/illegal-aliens-are-still-voting-our-elections
- Voting Machine Vulnerabilities: Concerns persist, regarding the reliability and impartiality of voting technology, with instances alleged where machines appeared to malfunction in ways that disadvantaged specific candidates.
This pattern of failure, from criminal conspiracies to systemic loopholes; paints a picture of an electoral process in dire need of scrutiny and strengthening. The existing federal task force (while a formal structure), has not prevented these breaches, suggesting a need for more proactive and rigorous oversight.
https://rumble.com/v4f4zb0-new-jersey-county-sues-dominion-voting-systems.html
In a classic case of political gaslighting, the Democratic party claims there's no need to worry about election security, while simultaneously having screamed about Russian collusion between that nation and the Trump administration (claims that have been debunked for several years). The evidence of criminal activity exists and those caught have been part of the party that claims there should be no concern.
With the real and documented threats to election integrity providing a vital roadmap for voters, this is no longer merely a choice between candidates; it is a test of the electorate's commitment to preserving the foundational principles of transparent and accountable government.
To ensure this information achieves maximum impact, citizens can demand federal action on election security. The documented cases of fraud in New Jersey provide powerful justification to contact the President and demand the use of all available resources to monitor all election-related activities in New Jersey; from the start of early voting until the last ballot is counted and all county elections activities are certified.
Utilizing traditional mail services in addition to digital communication, enhances the likelihood of eliciting the desired responses and actions from your elected officials. To reach the President by this means:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
The first link, is where he seems to be the most active.
https://rumble.com/c/ilDonaldoTrumpo
https://rumble.com/c/whitehouse
https://youtube.com/@whitehouse
Sharing any of the web addresses below, will help recognize the need for such actions.
https://rumble.com/v4f4zb0-new-jersey-county-sues-dominion-voting-systems.html
https://electionfraud.heritage.org/
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/illegal-aliens-are-still-voting-our-elections
- The Choice Before New Jersey -
Mikie Sherrill represents a particular species of modern political figure: one whose aesthetic of competence, masks a reality of calculation; whose rhetoric of service conceals a pattern of self-interest; whose performance of principle belies a practice of convenience. She is not an anomaly but an archetype: the product of a political system that rewards narrative over substance, ambition over integrity and flexibility over conviction.
New Jersey stands at a crossroads, facing very real challenges of affordability, education and governance. The question before its voters is not merely about policy preferences but about the very character of leadership they will endorse. Will they choose the carefully constructed persona; the master of political ambiguity; the candidate who refuses to be pinned down? Or will they seek leadership grounded in transparency, consistency and unwavering commitment to principle rather than party?
Sherrill's record suggests a fundamental truth: political talent should not be confused with political character. She has demonstrated considerable skill in navigating the currents of political advancement but has she demonstrated the moral compass necessary for genuine leadership? The evidence suggests she has not.
In the end, the polished performance cannot forever conceal the hollowness within; the absence of a core philosophical foundation, that would enable her to transcend political calculation and serve something greater than her own advancement. For New Jersey, the risk is not merely a continuation of current policies but the validation of a political style, that elevates ambition over integrity and calculation over conviction.
- Resources:
- The Call to Action -
For every person around the world, American and or otherwise...the patterns in Mikie Sherrill's career represent more than a political case study; they constitute a civic emergency. The detailed record of her evolution, from a figure of purported integrity, to a candidate enmeshed in controversy; provides a vital roadmap for voters navigating the fog of political marketing.
The urgency of this moment demands more than passive observation; it requires active participation in the production. By sharing every article and video; one effectively amplifies these substantiated concerns, where the biased media cannot control the message shared. By elevating any of the resources below by sharing it with others, knowledge is passed on but a larger audience is created as such activity generates online recognition by make these resources go viral.
- Resources:
- Jack Ciattarelli: Opponent not seeking to weaken American values or divide America, helping his campaign, helps not just New Jersey but helps in making a better America. His website:
- Scott Presler is America's leading conservative activist. Well known in Republican circles due to his success rate in flipping areas to be conservative.
- Conservative news outlet for New Jersey:
"Our cause is the cause of all mankind and that we are fighting for their liberty in defending our own."
- Benjamin Franklin
In conclusion, for those who value this channel and desire to make a positive impact, the most impactful gesture is through prayer. Offering prayers for the well-being of this channel is a sincere and meaningful way to contribute.
In consideration of the presence of various officials and supporters of the Woke movement, the identity of the operator behind this communication will remain undisclosed. Nevertheless, individuals are encouraged to offer prayers for "the individual managing the channel, Blue Enigma zero-one." Your intentions will be recognized by God.
"If everything around you seems dark, look again, you may be the light."
- Rumi
Addendum: Within the "Supplemental Material" section (situated beneath the date of the video post, the number of views and assigned tags); there lies a treasure trove of valuable content waiting to be discovered. This segment frequently comprises an abundance of extra information and resources.
Exploring this segment could prove to be advantageous in obtaining deeper insights. The purpose of this detailed explanation, is to accommodate the varied terminology used by different individuals; which can sometimes make it challenging to locate the desired content.
(LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE FOR USER-GENERATED CONTENT PLATFORM:
1. FAIR USE NOTICE UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW
All audiovisual materials, excerpts or derivative content (collectively, "Third-Party Content") displayed on this channel are utilized STRICTLY PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 107 (Copyright Act of 1976). Such use is confined to:
- (a) Criticism, commentary and educational analysis;
- (b) Historical documentation and scholarly research;
- (c) Transformative repurposing that adds new meaning, context or insight distinct from the original work.
This channel does not claim ownership over Third-Party Content. Any copyright-related inquiries must be directed to the rights holder(s) pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(c).
2. ABSOLUTE NON-ENDORSEMENT CLAUSE
- Persons & Entities: Mention, depiction or reference to any individual, organization, political group or entity (including hyperlinks in descriptions) DOES NOT CONSTITUTE endorsement, affiliation, sponsorship or approval by this channel.
- Platform Liability: Rumble Inc. and its affiliates are EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED from responsibility for this channel's content under 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1).
- Viewer Interpretation: All analysis, conclusions or narratives presented are solely those of the channel operator and DO NOT REFLECT the views of creators of Third-Party Content.
3. RELIGIOUS, SYMBOLIC & AESTHETIC CONTENT
Use of religious iconography, political symbols or cultural imagery serves EXCLUSIVELY for:
- (a) Academic analysis of sociopolitical movements;
- (b) Visual contextualization of subject matter;
- (c) Satirical or critical commentary protected under *Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,* 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
*USAGE DOES NOT IMPLY PROMOTION OF/AFFILIATION WITH any faith, ideology or institution.
4. PROHIBITION ON CONTENT REUSE
EXPLICIT RESTRICTIONS:
- Third-Party Content is NOT LICENSED for redistribution, commercial exploitation or derivative use by viewers.
- Written commentary by the operator is permitted for citation under fair use only if:
(i) Attributing this channel;
(ii) Not modified;
(iii) Used non-commercially.
5. HEALTH & FINANCIAL DISCLAIMERS
- HEALTH/NUTRITION CONTENT: Any references to medical treatments, supplements or diets are FOR INFORMATIONAL SCRUTINY ONLY AND CONSTITUTES PERSONAL OPINION. They lack review or approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consult licensed healthcare providers before acting on such information (21 U.S.C. § 343 et seq.).
- FINANCIAL/POLITICAL ANALYSIS: Discussions of economic policy, investments or legislation constitute OPINION, not professional advice. No outcomes are guaranteed. Independent verification via qualified advisors is required.
6. GENERAL LIABILITY RELEASE
This channel disclaims all liability for:
- (a) Accuracy of Third-Party Content;
- (b) Damages arising from viewer reliance on content;
- (c) Legal actions initiated by third parties (viewers indemnify operator per DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT safe harbor provisions).
Jurisdiction for disputes resides exclusively in U.S. federal courts governing copyright law.
*ACKNOWLEDGMENT
By accessing this channel, viewers confirm:
"I understand this content is educational/commentary. I release the channel operator from liability and acknowledge that political neutrality is maintained in legal assertions herein."
Help rekt the system of ctrl and abuse by the ieleez
-
LIVE
StoneMountain64
2 hours agoBF6 Full Release Gameplay Review - I have been playing EARLY
182 watching -
LIVE
Barry Cunningham
14 hours agoBREAKING NEWS: PRESIDENT TRUMP HOSTS FULL CABINET MEETING!
936 watching -
1:59:05
The Charlie Kirk Show
2 hours agoTurning Point Halftime + Antifa Panel Aftermath + Right-Wing Taylor Swift? |Patrick, Cuomo|10.9.2025
31.1K12 -
27:46
Jasmin Laine
2 hours agoCBC TURNS On Carney After Trump HUMILIATES Him–Poilievre’s Response Goes Viral
3044 -
4:27:44
Right Side Broadcasting Network
5 hours agoLIVE REPLAY: President Trump Hosts a Cabinet Meeting - 10/9/25
87.2K40 -
LIVE
Mark Kaye
2 hours ago🔴 Schumer BUSTED Celebrating Democrat Shutdown!
990 watching -
1:00:33
Timcast
2 hours agoTrump To Declare Antifa FOREIGN Terrorist Org, Antifa Leaders FLEE Country
120K69 -
2:41:53
MattMorseTV
4 hours ago $6.53 earned🔴Trump's Cabinet Meeting BOMBSHELL.🔴
40.7K35 -
18:54
Neil McCoy-Ward
1 hour ago🔥 SHOCK! What She Just DECLARED Over The 🇺🇸 USA & Trump!
5.17K8 -
LIVE
Rebel News
1 hour agoLive from ostrich farm, Trump lists Antifa as terrorists, Poilievre calls out Carney | Rebel Roundup
366 watching
