The Supreme Court Clerk, Scott S. Harris, is a Traitor.

10 days ago
88

Scott S. Harris is a Traitor. He is the Enemy.
Andy gives a brief description of the ENEMY's tactics.
The Complicit Judges and Clerks across America engage in “SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY” (Title 18 US Code 2384) as an “ENEMY” (Title 50 U.S. Code 2204) executing “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (Title 18 U.S. Code 2331) and TREASON (Title 18 U.S. Code 2381) against “the People” of America by weaponizing judicial authority from top to bottom for any objective and/or target.

CHARGES - CGS 54-170 Arrest without Warrant:
The Complicit Participants named above are in violation of the following: the US Constitution; Title 18 U.S.C Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law; Title 5 Administrative Procedure Act 1946; Title 18 U.S. Code 1509. Obstruction of court orders; Title18 U.S. Code 2076 Clerk is to File; Title 18 U.S. Code 2071 : Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, documents filed; Title 50 U.S. Code 2204 Definitions “ENEMY”, “SPOILS OF WAR”, etc.; Title 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1346 - Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”; Title 15 U.S. Code § 1122 - Liability of United States and States, and instrumentalities and officials thereof; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2331 – Definitions “Domestic Terrorism”; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2332b - Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason.
Dates of the Supreme Court Petitions (Restitution):

September 13, 2024 – RE: Samuel A. Magliari, Jr., [Bill of Complaint -$1,767,881,784]

September 13, 2024 – RE: Andrew Hamilton Pritchard & “We the People of Connecticut”. [Bill of Complaint - $725,781,907,128]

November 13, 2024 – RE: Joseph B. Elad & “We the People of America” [Bill of Complaint - $140,000,000,000]

December 16, 2024 – RE: “We the People of America” and Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. [Bill of Complaint - $33,755,862,000,000]

July 31, 2025 – RE: “The 658 Cantor Fitzgerald Employees Killed in 9/11” and Partner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. [Bill of Complaint - $673,888,633]

September 8, 2025 – RE: “We the People of America” and Andrew Hamilton Pritchard. [Bill of Complaint - $1,712,164,760]

Restitution Total: $34,625,797,842,305

Downs v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
"It will be an evil day for American Liberty if the theory of a government outside supreme law finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this Court than to exert its full authority to prevent all violations of the principles of the Constitution.”

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, (1966)
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them."

Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
"The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151 ) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better."

Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390 - Supreme Court 1923
Take judicial notice of an adjudicated fact by the Supreme Court, that writ of habeas corpus--may be invoked if the petitioner is free from bodily restraint and thereby the court is prohibited from dismissing this petition on the grounds the petitioner is not a prisoner or jailed.
As to LIBERTY, “While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”
Wild v. Fregein Construction, 68 P.3rd 855 (2003).
To falsify information is indisputably fraud. “If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck.., even if it is holding a piece of paper that says it is a chicken”

King James Version (KJV) Galatians 6:7, “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.”

Loading comments...