About King Arthur.

All right, then. Okay, let's let's get let's get stuck in. Thank you, Stu. All right, then. King Arthur is complete fiction. Well, that's what a lot of people thought. And actually, that's what I thought until I came across Alan Wilson and Baron Blacket. Um, I first saw Alan Wilson and Baron Blacket on Rich Planet TV. As we all know, um, Richard D. Hall is the host of Rich Planet TV, and he had Alan Wilson on there, and Alan Wilson was pretty much saying that, um, the Welsh records acknowledge King Arthur as a real historical figure. And um, I mean, I I think I was much I I took the news. Yeah, the irony. It's crazy, isn't it? I took the news that um King Arthur was a real historical figure as complete rubbish. Quite frankly, I was very much like yourself and Taffy Taffy the Mongo. I took it I took it with a pinch of salt. But then Richard Deh Hall kept on having Adam Wilson and Baron Blacket back on the show and what they said made sense and of course I brought all their books. I got the King Arthur the War King and I got um well you know I got all the books I could on Alan Wilson Baron Black and as an intelligent man which listen I put my hand up and say yes I'm I'm an intelligent man. I'm intelligent as the next man, you know, as intelligent as the next man. I read their books and I could came to the conclusion that they're on to something. Everything they said was backed up with archeological evidence. French fiction writer wrote the whole whole thing, Camelot, Arthur, Lancelot, etc. etc. I agree that the French I call what we learn what we know about King Arthur as French romantic rubbish from the 14th century but of course King Arthur was alive in the 5th 6th century born 503 AD on Christmas day south South Wales Glorgan so I I totally agree with you Stu what we know about King Arthur is based on 14th century French fiction writer bullshit. And that's what Hollywood bases their story of King Arthur on French fiction writer bullshit. But of course the real story of King Arthur is based on the Welsh records, Welsh poems, Welsh chronicles which the establishment acknowledge are there but the establishment call those records false. They claim it is all an 18th century forgery which of course Alan Wilson Baron Blacket debunked. So yes, Joe, you know, I totally get what you're saying because I felt the same way. But um having researched to my satisfaction, I've now come to the conclusion that King Arthur the second was a real historical figure. And when I say the second, I I I specify that point because as we all know with kings and queens, you get we've had two Elizabeths. We've got three King Charles In the same way, there's been five King Arthurs. King Arthur I was the grandson of Emperor Constantine, the son of Magnus Magnus. And King Arthur II, born Christmas Day 503 AD, South Gloran, Wales, is the king we identify with at the moment. He was the king who who fought the Saxons. King Arthur the first caught fought the Romans. But King Arthur II fought the Saxons, united the kingdom. He brought in the summer games, the round table, Camelot. So it's all there for the taking and all you have to do is is read Alan Wilson and Baron Blacket. And of course, um, then Ross Broadstock came along and he felt the same way. It much the same with me. He heard about Anon Wilson on the Richard D. Hall show. He looked into it and he came to the same conclusion. So, thank you, Stu. But I do find it interesting how after asking and this is very and I'm not going to beat you up for it, okay? I just think it's it illustrates perfectly what mindset you have. So after asking whether your comments can be seen or not, are my comments still blocked? You realize they aren't. So whack coming with the um with the slap with that you know King Arthur is complete fiction and mind you Stu Infinity for the first time actually I think maybe you could be the Mr. Degenerate because he uses the minions doesn't he?