Revoke the release of a defendant

The court hearing regarding a motion to revoke the release of a defendant, Mr. Thompson, based on allegations of menacing and reckless endangerment involving his neighbor, Mr. Reed, over a disputed shared driveway easement.
Motion to Revoke Release Hearing
The hearing addresses a state's motion to revoke the release of Mr. Thompson due to alleged violations of a conditional release agreement.

The hearing is focused on a motion filed by the state on August 1, 2025, regarding Mr. Thompson's alleged menacing and reckless endangerment towards Mr. Reed.
Mr. Thompson had signed a release agreement on March 3, 2025, prohibiting contact with Mr. Reed, the alleged victim.
The state presents Mr. Reed as a witness to testify about the alleged violations of the release agreement.

Dispute Over Shared Driveway
The case involves a dispute between Mr. Thompson and Mr. Reed regarding the use of a shared driveway and easement. ​

Mr. Thompson claims exclusive rights to the easement established by a deed in 1971, while Mr. Reed asserts his right to use the shared driveway. ​
The easement is described as 30 feet wide and runs along the east side of Mr. Reed's property.
Mr. Reed has provided video evidence of Mr. Thompson's alleged harassment while using the easement.

Video Evidence and Objections
The court examines video evidence presented by Mr. Reed, while Mr. Thompson raises objections regarding privacy and admissibility.

Mr. Reed recorded videos showing Mr. Thompson yelling at him, which he claims are evidence of harassment.
Mr. Thompson objects to the videos being admissible, arguing they were taken on his private easement where he has a right to privacy. ​
The court ultimately admits the videos into evidence despite Mr. Thompson's objections.

Testimony from Mr. Reed
Mr. Reed provides testimony about multiple instances of harassment by Mr. Thompson since the conditional release agreement was signed.

Mr. Reed estimates that Mr. Thompson has verbally contacted him 8 to 10 times since March 3, 2025.
He describes specific incidents, including one where Mr. Thompson approached him on a bicycle and yelled at him. ​
Mr. Reed mentions having surveillance cameras that could corroborate his claims but did not present that footage in court.

Mr. Thompson's Defense and Claims
Mr. Thompson defends himself against the allegations, asserting that he is the victim in this situation.

He claims that there is no shared driveway and that the easement is exclusively his, as established by the 1971 deed.
Mr. Thompson argues that Mr. Reed's actions constitute stalking and harassment, not the other way around.
He emphasizes that the conditional release agreement does not restrict his use of the easement for accessing his property.

Legal Dispute Over Easement Rights
The text discusses a legal argument regarding the rights and responsibilities associated with an easement in Oregon law. ​

The easement was created in 1971, with no involvement from the Reed family.
Multiple easement holders require a maintenance agreement, which has not been established.
The speaker has maintained the easement alone, including snow removal. ​
The easement is for roadway purposes, benefiting the dominant tenement, not the servient property. ​
The servient property must not interfere with the easement. ​

Conditional Release Agreement Concerns
The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the conditional release agreement process and its implications.

The speaker claims they were not consulted on the wording of the agreement.
They describe feeling coerced into signing the agreement.
The agreement lacks clarity regarding the rules and conditions.
The speaker alleges ongoing interference with their easement rights since the agreement was established. ​

Incidents of Harassment and Confrontation
The text details specific incidents of harassment involving the Reed family and the speaker.

On July 6, 2025, Timothy Craig Reed allegedly assaulted the speaker's wife.
The speaker describes being stalked and confronted by the Reed family on their easement.
The speaker asserts that the Reeds have made false statements about their interactions.
The speaker maintains that they have never sought contact with the Reed family.

Legal Proceedings and Witness Testimonies
The text includes testimonies from the speaker's wife regarding property ownership and easement rights.

Rachel Thompson confirms they are the sole holders of the easement.
The couple has owned the property for about nine years and has maintained the easement.
They have filed a quiet title lawsuit, which is currently stalled. ​
The conditional release agreement was not clearly explained during the arraignment. ​

Ongoing Legal and Property Issues
The text highlights the ongoing legal battles related to the easement and property rights. ​

The couple has faced extensive litigation over the easement for 13 years.
There is no resolution in sight for the quiet title lawsuit. ​
The speaker believes the conditional release is an attempt to interfere with their property rights. ​
The speaker and their wife feel their safety and enjoyment of property are compromised by the Reeds' actions.