9 days ago

******Dietrich Bonehuffer was a Heritic.
Well known for doctrinal teachings on Jesus and Jazz. Ughh....
Below insights.
The web page of the first Movie has a pledge to repent, (lol) for Christians causing the Holobunga. It didnt happen. It was war Propaganda. https://rumble.com/v5kdd0t-why-bonhoeffer-is-in-hell-exposing-a-failed-assassin-false-prophet-and-fake.html
Liberalism

Liberalism is the belief that the Bible contains errors. It denies the infallibility of Scripture, which it very troubling. While being a heresy itself, it also opens up the door for other heresies. Bonhoeffer wrote on page 73 of Christ the Center,

‎”The Bible remains a book like other books. One must be ready to accept the concealment within history and therefore let historical criticism run its course. But it is through the Bible, with all its flaws, that the risen one encounters us. We must get into the troubled waters of historical criticism. Its importance is not absolute, but neither is it unimportant. Certainly it will not lead to a weakening, but rather to a strengthening of faith because the concealment within the historical belongs to the humiliation of Jesus Christ.”

When speaking of the creation account, Bonhoeffer claimed it was in error. He said,

“Here we have before us the ancient world picture in all its scientific naïveté. While it would not be advisable to be too mocking and self-assured, in view of the rapid changes in our own knowledge of nature, undoubtedly in this passage the biblical author stands exposed with all the limitations caused by the age in which he lived. The heavens and the seas were not formed in the way he says: we would not escape a very bad conscience if we committed ourselves to any such statement.” (Creation and Temptation, page 27)

Moral Relativism

The moral law of God is a reflection of God’s nature. It is absolute and unchanging. However, some, including Bonhoeffer, would claim that all morality is subjective. He claimed,

“The Christian himself creates his standards of good and evil for himself.” (No Rusty Sword, page 143)

To claim this is to claim that God’s law is subjective. It could be considered a form of Antinomianism.

Pluralism

Morality is not the only thing Bonhoeffer thinks is Relative. He has also promoted the idea of their being many paths to God, which is the Pluralist heresy. In Testament to Freedom on page 53, Bonhoeffer claimed,

“What are we to think of other religions? Are they as nothing compared to Christianity? We answer that the Christian religion as religion is not of God. It is rather another example of a human way to God, like the Buddhist and others, too, though of course these are of a different nature.”

Not only does he falsely claim that Christianity is not of God, but he states that Buddhism and other religions are the same as Christianity, all being examples of human ways to God. He said something similar in his sermon entitled “Jesus Christ and the Essence of Christianity”.

“Christ is not the bringer of a new religion, but rather the one who brings good. Therefore, as an impossible way from the human to God, the Christian religion stands with other religions.”

Neinauferstehungism
The resurrection is essential to Christianity. A denial of the resurrection is a serious heresy. Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15:14 (ESV),
“And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.”
This is a large contrast to what Bonhoeffer has to say in Letters and Papers from Prison, page 329,
My view is that the full content, including the ‘mythological’ concepts, must be kept—the New Testament is not a mythological clothing of a universal truth; this mythology (resurrection etc.) is the thing itself.
His prime example of a myth is the resurrection? That is troubling. Since his faith is in a Jesus who has not risen from the dead, I would say that that faith is in vain and his preaching is in vain.
Peccatheism

The sinlessness of Jesus is essential for the atonement. Without being sinless, His sacrifice would be insufficient and He would no longer be a perfect sacrifice. In fact, He would also cease to be God! To claim otherwise is a heresy I call Peccatheism. Dietrich Bonhoeffer was a Peccatheist. This can be read in Christ the Center page 109, where he claims,

“The sinlessness of Jesus fails if it is based upon the observable acts of Jesus. His acts take place in the homoioma sarkos. They are not sinless, but ambiguous. One can and should see both good and failure in them.”
Bonhoeffer was not a sound teacher. He may have done good things, but his teachings should be avoided and warned about.

Maimonides ranked Islam superior than Christianity on theological grounds. For him, Christianity is the prime example of the error of such anthropomorphism in its original doctrine of the Incarnation and in its associated doctrine of the Trinity.
Jeremiah 7:16, when God says DON'T PRAY for .....7:16 ¶Therefore pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee.
**** THE GOSPEL The death Burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ was a Legal Procedure.
It's called... Penal, Substitutionary, Atonement.
IT'S A JUDICIAL LAW of the universe of present and Time past that all humanity owes and Jesus paid according to this law.
Everyone has sinned against God. The price we owe him for having done this is to much for us to ever pay.
GOOD THING JESUS DID IT FOR YOU...Someone has to pay the debt, You or Him. Let him.
There's only one truth. Jesus came to tell you its him.

The Resurrection
LUKE 24: 5.and as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead?6.He is not here, but is risen:
*****************Next
on Maimonides who christians should not entertain, he, via, the talmud states
" my son, be more careful on the obsevance of the words of the talmud (Oral law, not written )than the words of the torah" The Oral law precedes the written law.
Pharisaic beliefs and business
A "middle-class" movement. Unlike the Sadducees, who were tied to the priestly, aristocratic elite and the Jerusalem Temple, the Pharisees were mostly laymen who made their living from various professions. Many were merchants and tradesmen, ( coppersmiths ex) which helps explain why so much of the Talmudic material—which grew out of Pharisaic thought—deals with commercial matters.
Acts 4:6.
They had investments in making idols for the idol worshipping gentiles. Money went into their God, the temple. Pattern was just that. Jesus knew that they taught and practised. Ex.
Mark 7 :9-11
if HONOR THY FATHER AND MOTHER commandment was broken, CORBAN which is a sacrifice would get them out of the consequences the law called for. They did not even believe Moses. JESUS said
13Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
In The idol making business. It was permitted to sell idols to gentiles. They did not honor the law of Moses on idols either. They worshipped the temple. It was an idol.
Mark 7:
8For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9¶And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.

The Soncino edition of the babylonian talmud,
In it their holy writ states,
Isaiah was punished for saying the children of israel had unclean lips. Yebomoth 49 b
🚨 Tractate yebomoth 49 b - quote,
"When the saw reached his mouth he died. ( and this was punishment) for having said,
"And I dwell in the
midst of a people that have unclean lips."

Tractate yebomoth 49 b from the Babylonian talmud it...
discusses the execution of
the prophet Isaiah
as a penalty for having said of the israelites they had
unclean lips.
This is what the oral tradition the talmud, judaisms authority teaches about the
prophet Isaiah.....
that he was killed, and he received what he deserved,
for daring to say, the israelites had unclean lips.

Jesus knew the oral law and traditions of the elders the talmud....in Mark 7 he addresses it.
The talmud is the written form of the traditions of the elders.

Loading comments...