Anthony Dillon: An Indigenous Voice?

SUMMARY:
------------------------------
Thanks so much — I’m really excited to share this candid talk, “Anthony Dillon – An Indigenous Voice.” I lay out where I stand: I haven’t dismissed the Voice outright, but if I had to vote tomorrow I’d probably say no because there’s too much missing detail. I’m speaking from personal experience and Aboriginal land ancestry, but I don’t claim to be the last word on anything and I welcome correction and respectful challenge. Over 25 years I’ve seen repeated attempts to create a separate representative body for Indigenous people; the Voice feels like the latest version of that thinking. I explore the tension between the genuine need for special measures to close the gap and the risk of formalising identity politics or making certain perspectives untouchable. This talk is honest, reflective and a little restless — full of questions, real concerns and an invitation to open, mature debate. If you want nuance rather than slogans, and a perspective from someone who cares deeply about outcomes, this is for you.

RUMBLE DESCRIPTION:
-----------------------------------
Welcome — glad you’re here. In this recorded talk Anthony Dillon speaks plainly about the proposed Indigenous Voice to Parliament: where he stands, why he’s hesitant, and the personal context behind his views. Anthony makes it clear he hasn’t dismissed the Voice completely, but if voting were tomorrow he’d be inclined to say no because the proposal still lacks crucial detail. He’s honest about his background — Aboriginal land ancestry — while also stressing that lineage doesn’t automatically make someone an expert or place them beyond challenge.

Over more than 25 years Anthony has watched repeated efforts to create a separate advisory or representative body for Indigenous Australians. In this presentation he argues the Voice is simply the latest manifestation of that long-running idea. He examines both sides of the argument: the legitimate case for special measures to Close the Gap, and the real risks of formalising identity politics or creating an institution that could make dissenting voices harder to hear.

This is a thoughtful, conversational talk rather than a legal brief — Anthony isn’t a lawyer and points listeners to the Q&A and other speakers for technical detail. Expect candid reflections, some uncomfortable questions, and a heartfelt call for informed, respectful debate. Drop a comment, share your thoughts, and if you find this useful please like and subscribe for more talks like this.

⚠️ CONTENT DISCLAIMER ⚠️
The views, opinions, and statements expressed in this video are those of the individual speaker(s) and audience members. They do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of Western Heritage Australia or its affiliates.

This content is presented for educational and informational purposes as well as to facilitate public discourse on important social and political issues. We provide a platform for diverse Australian voices to be heard, to assist the public in forming their own informed opinions.

Western Heritage Australia does not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the accuracy of statements made by speakers. All claims, statistics, and opinions remain the responsibility of the original speaker. Viewers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult multiple sources when forming opinions on these topics.

This video may contain strong political opinions, controversial viewpoints, strong language, or mature themes. Viewer discretion is advised.