Public Warning: The Perverse Minds Behind BaconBashers and Call me SIR.

It is with deep concern that I must highlight the behaviour of two individuals operating under the usernames BaconBashers and Call me SIR. These accounts have used my YouTube comment section to publish vile and false accusations of child sexual abuse against myself and my family.

Let me be clear: their words are not simple insults. They are graphic, detailed, and perverse. To construct such comments requires a disturbing imagination—an imagination steeped in imagery no healthy or decent person would conjure up, let alone write publicly.

By choosing to spread these accusations, BaconBashers and Call me SIR reveal more about themselves than they do about me. Their comments are projections, confessions of a warped mindset. They are using the anonymity of YouTube not to share opinions, but to broadcast their own perversions.

This behaviour is a forewarning of who they truly are and what they may be capable of. The most pressing concern is the possibility that these individuals may be parents themselves. If that is the case, then children could be at risk—not from the person they target, but from the disturbed individuals making these comments.

Therefore, I urge the following:

To BaconBashers and Call me SIR: Seek professional help immediately. Your words have exposed your inner world, and it is one of corruption and danger. Left unchecked, this trajectory leads nowhere good.

To anyone who knows the true identities of these individuals: Do the right thing. Contact the appropriate authorities and alert them to the behaviour being displayed online. The safety of children may depend on it.

The internet offers anonymity, but words leave fingerprints. By their own hand, these trolls have revealed themselves. The world should take note—and act accordingly.

Projection of Perversion: When Trolls Reveal Themselves.

“agh the old slosher would be proud of her son touching up his own kiddies shes real proud xxxx are you still grinding the kids arms & legs matty social workers never fell of the littles accidental rubs did thay”

“I heard he touched up Emma too back when the Mum left them alone at home.”

In the world of online interaction, comment sections are often described as the modern-day public square. They are places where opinions, ideas, and reflections can be shared freely. Yet, as many of us have witnessed, they are also breeding grounds for abuse, slander, and projection.

A striking example of this is the behaviour of individuals who enter these spaces not to engage with the content, but to weaponise it for their own dark ends. When faced with comments that accuse someone of the most vile and unspeakable acts—particularly relating to child abuse—it is essential to pause and ask: what does it say about the mind of the person who wrote it?

The reality is this: in order to write such comments, the imagery must already exist in the writer’s head. The construction of accusations such as “touching up children,” “grinding arms and legs,” or inventing stories of incest, does not emerge from nowhere. These words are not neutral or casual. They are laden with perverse imagination, the product of a mind that dwells on such imagery enough to put it into writing.

By accusing others, these individuals inadvertently reveal themselves. This is projection in its most toxic form. They attribute to others the very sickness they harbour within. In psychology, projection is the mechanism by which a person deflects their own unacceptable feelings or impulses by attributing them to someone else. It is easier for them to call another person a monster than to confront the monster inside their own mind.

This makes such comments more than just harassment—they are windows into the writers’ subconscious. When someone repeatedly uses accusations of child abuse as their weapon of choice, it tells us more about them than it ever does about their target. A healthy, balanced individual does not leap to these kinds of allegations. A normal person does not dwell on such grotesque scenarios. Only someone who carries those images around, who feeds upon them in some way, would feel the need to type them out and publish them in a public forum.

In doing so, they misuse comment sections as an outlet for their own perversions. While the intended target feels the sting of defamation, the real revelation lies in what the attacker has exposed about themselves. Their choice of words betrays their inner world. They do not humiliate their victim so much as they humiliate themselves.

What these trolls fail to grasp is that their tactics backfire. Each accusation, each attempt to tarnish another person’s name, only leaves a clearer fingerprint of their own disturbed psychology. They may think they are clever, hiding behind pseudonyms, spreading bile under the cloak of anonymity. But anonymity does not erase truth. Their words betray them.

Thus, when we encounter such comments, we must reframe our reaction. Instead of internalising the insult, we recognise the projection. We see it for what it is: the confession of a diseased mind masquerading as mockery. They are not revealing who we are. They are revealing who they are.

And that, ultimately, is the deepest irony. By trying to smear another person, they end up broadcasting their own corruption. By attempting to brand another as perverse, they unwittingly signpost the perversion within themselves.