Latest Breaking Cases! Why Does This Keep Happening??

A loosely run, chat-driven “true crime” livestream that promises multiple breaking cases but spends significant time on tech issues, greetings, and celebrating gifted memberships. The focal case is the Laken Snelling investigation; information is read from secondary sources and social posts with heavy moral commentary and speculation. Minimal original reporting.

Trigger warning: discussion of infant death, graphic case details, and strong opinions.
Note: All persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Health/medical claims mentioned on stream are unvetted; do not take them as advice.

What to expect

Repeated tech/audio interruptions and long donor shout-outs.

Host and guest oscillate between casual chit-chat (food, diets) and true-crime commentary.

Main case coverage: alleged discovery of an infant in a closet; charges cited as abuse of a corpse, tampering with evidence, concealing birth; bond/home-incarceration mentioned; coroner results pending at time of discussion.

Frequent speculation (e.g., boyfriend awareness, “pregnancy shoot” photos) and broader rants about “lenient judges.”
Accuracy & sourcing

Info is largely read from other outlets and social media; chat comments sometimes treated as facts.

No on-air verification of several claims; county names/terms occasionally misread.

If you need verified updates, check primary reports and court records.

My takeaway:

More community hangout than news brief. Substantive case details are fragmented and repeatedly interrupted by monetization segments and tech issues. Expect strong opinions and speculation, not a concise, sourced rundown.

📌 FULL LIVE HERE - https://www.youtube.com/live/Gg7lGys_MDI?si=Y3r1-Jb-uLTrMxiq

📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

📌 Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgSKmkXzVsuXIN5iQuKEhVw/join
👉 DMCA Attorney
Copyright Strikes
Protect your privacy from trolls and stalkers
Counterdmca.com