Premium Only Content
Statutes Are Not Laws
Confusion over the Bill of Rights and the so called "law".
Statutes are not laws.
Any legislative body can only REGULATE COMMERCE.
So without a living being or property being harmed, no crime has taken place.
All the rest is smoke & mirror BS statutes.
We used to have booze free Sundays, and stores closes on Sundays, and even in prohibition, they couldn't arrest you for the consumption, only the selling & distribution.
If they created a statute that it was illegal to eat jellybeans on Sunday, is that a law?
Would a jury convict me of a "crime" if I was caught eating jellybeans on Sunday? Not likely.
But a statutory jury in and administrative court would direct them to do so.
But under the "common law", which is the law regarding private rights, nobody would because my eating jelly beans hasn't harmed anyone.
And that's the deciding factor.
All the rest is consent and contracts of commerce.
They trick the people into being in commerce.
So once you have the lens to SEE this, it's easy to extrapolate from it.
If the Bill of Rights isn't being respected, isn't that warring against the Constitution?
Don't the two go hand in hand?
That IS the contract to constrain the so called government right?
But the government isn't the government anymore.
They are private corporations.
You hear a lot about the Articles these days in Trump 2.0 and thank God we are.
This is so unfamiliar to people that the super ignorant who support the looney left topics consider it to be tyrannical when one is following the Constitution because of FEELINGS.
Article I is legislative. Legislative controls commerce.
Unless a court is specifically Article III it's Article I and you have no rights in those courts.
They are fictitious.
Article II is the powers of the president/executive branch.
Article III is judicial.
Not all courts are created equal in fact I'd say it's the biggest legal fockery of a lifetime.
I discovered a judgment against me declared by a Justice of the Peach (laughing) where I was never served, never mailed anything, and the judgement never hit my credit.
But the attorneys can claim a victory and probably got paid by whomever hired them.
But it was completely unlawful and administrative.
I reported it to the state judiciary ethics.
Crickets.
You know what they do?
Only monitor the personal behavior of the judge, which doesn't count IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTROOM.
This is legal fockery.
Join the fight at https://InalienableUniversity.com
-
14:14
Gianna Miceli
6 days agoPart Two 9th Amendment Where Are Our Rights?
221 -
32:09
Comedy Dynamics
13 hours agoBest of Jesus Trejo: Stay at Home Son - Stand-Up Comedy
1.46K -
55:43
TruthStream with Joe and Scott
1 day agoHoney and Lisa 11/17: How powerful we are, Trauma release, Becoming Sovereign (next healing event 11/20/25 @ noon eastern and 4pm eastern) #513
4.54K10 -
LIVE
Lofi Girl
3 years agolofi hip hop radio 📚 - beats to relax/study to
605 watching -
1:00:27
Coin Stories with Natalie Brunell
1 day agoMike Alfred’s Full Investment Playbook: Inside Bitcoin, Miners & AI
36.3K2 -
2:34:07
Badlands Media
13 hours agoDEFCON ZERQ Ep. 018: Global Smokescreens & the Deep State Energy War
215K64 -
2:05:03
Inverted World Live
7 hours agoHouse Votes to Release Epstein Files w/ Emilie Hagen & Denise Bovee | Ep. 143
63.7K4 -
3:02:27
TimcastIRL
7 hours agoEpstein Transparency PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, Trump To SIGN Release | Timcast IRL
256K123 -
6:26:43
SpartakusLIVE
9 hours agoARC is SO ADDICTING - I just CAN'T stop || NEW SCHEDULE, NEED SLEEP
89K3 -
4:53:41
Drew Hernandez
1 day agoEPSTEIN TRANSPARENCY ACT PASSES: POLITICAL THEATER OR FULL DISCLOSURE?
74.4K9