Premium Only Content

Statutes Are Not Laws
Confusion over the Bill of Rights and the so called "law".
Statutes are not laws.
Any legislative body can only REGULATE COMMERCE.
So without a living being or property being harmed, no crime has taken place.
All the rest is smoke & mirror BS statutes.
We used to have booze free Sundays, and stores closes on Sundays, and even in prohibition, they couldn't arrest you for the consumption, only the selling & distribution.
If they created a statute that it was illegal to eat jellybeans on Sunday, is that a law?
Would a jury convict me of a "crime" if I was caught eating jellybeans on Sunday? Not likely.
But a statutory jury in and administrative court would direct them to do so.
But under the "common law", which is the law regarding private rights, nobody would because my eating jelly beans hasn't harmed anyone.
And that's the deciding factor.
All the rest is consent and contracts of commerce.
They trick the people into being in commerce.
So once you have the lens to SEE this, it's easy to extrapolate from it.
If the Bill of Rights isn't being respected, isn't that warring against the Constitution?
Don't the two go hand in hand?
That IS the contract to constrain the so called government right?
But the government isn't the government anymore.
They are private corporations.
You hear a lot about the Articles these days in Trump 2.0 and thank God we are.
This is so unfamiliar to people that the super ignorant who support the looney left topics consider it to be tyrannical when one is following the Constitution because of FEELINGS.
Article I is legislative. Legislative controls commerce.
Unless a court is specifically Article III it's Article I and you have no rights in those courts.
They are fictitious.
Article II is the powers of the president/executive branch.
Article III is judicial.
Not all courts are created equal in fact I'd say it's the biggest legal fockery of a lifetime.
I discovered a judgment against me declared by a Justice of the Peach (laughing) where I was never served, never mailed anything, and the judgement never hit my credit.
But the attorneys can claim a victory and probably got paid by whomever hired them.
But it was completely unlawful and administrative.
I reported it to the state judiciary ethics.
Crickets.
You know what they do?
Only monitor the personal behavior of the judge, which doesn't count IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTROOM.
This is legal fockery.
Join the fight at https://InalienableUniversity.com
-
1:36
Gianna Miceli
15 days agoKeep All Your Business Money
197 -
3:36:25
The Charlie Kirk Show
8 hours agoTHOUGHTCRIME Ep. 101 The New York City Communist Debate? MAGA vs Mamdani? Medal of Freedom Reactions
152K62 -
2:14:47
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoSatan’s Agenda vs. God’s Timeline: Witchcraft, Israel, and the Assassination of Charlie Kirk w/ Robin D. Bullock and Amanda Grace | FOC Show
56.2K10 -
3:14:57
PandaSub2000
5 days agoBye Sweet Carole | MIDNIGHT ADVENTURE CLUB (Original Live Version)
40.4K1 -
1:22:51
Glenn Greenwald
10 hours agoThe Irony of John Bolton's Classified Docs Indictment; Prominent Dems Now Stutter When Asked About AIPAC; Celebs in Saudi Arabia Controversy: What Does it Reveal? | SYSTEM UPDATE #532
102K57 -
39:25
Donald Trump Jr.
9 hours agoFBI's Incredible Crime Crackdown, Plus my Message to ABC!! | TRIGGERED Ep.283
156K114 -
2:53:38
BigTallRedneck
7 hours agoPGA 2K25 - REDNECK'S WAY OR THE HIGHWAY
19.1K1 -
2:43:58
megimu32
7 hours agoON THE SUBJECT: MTV | From 24/7 Music to… Silence?
13.5K6 -
4:38:09
Reolock
8 hours agoWoW Classic Hardcore | More Ultra? Maybe Mage?
8.83K -
1:02:05
BonginoReport
10 hours agoMusic Stars Go Viral For Anti-ICE Rants - Nightly Scroll w/ Hayley Caronia (Ep.157)
79.5K44