The Full Leaked 2001 Benjamin Netanyahu Video

In a leaked video in 2001, Benjamin "The Butcher" Netanyahu is seen speaking openly in 2001 at a settler's home, discussing the Oslo Accords, Bill Clinton, and the United States.

How he deceived the U.S. to break the Oslo Accords, and how Americans will always support Israel if it faces backlash.

It clearly shows Benjamin "The Butcher" Netanyahu talking about how Israel intentionally will massively strike Palestinians - he says, 'We must hit the Palestinians hard, take them to a state of panic and fear, and the World will not say anything.'

For Benjamin "The Butcher" Netanyahu - Peace was never an option.

Original Transcript:
"Turn off the camera so we can elaborate on this. A few minutes later, the camera is turned back on, and Benjamin "The Butcher" Netanyahu resumes, speaking freely. We're starting to understand the meaning of the slogan 'Yesha Zeikan Judea, Samaria, and Azza are here.' Yesha is everywhere, so what's the difference? What does Arafat want? He wants one big settlement, implying that Palestinians see all of Israel as one. Yes, that's what my daughter-in-law from England says—that Palestinians even see Tel Aviv as a settlement. Tel Aviv is indeed a settlement from their perspective, and even our territorial waters belong to them in their eyes. The truth is, they want us in the sea, far off in the distance. The Arabs are now preparing for a campaign of terror, believing it will break us. The key strategy is to hit them hard, not just with one blow but many, so that the price becomes unbearable. Right now, the cost is not unbearable. What we need is a total assault on the Palestinian Authority, to bring them to a state of panic where everything seems to be collapsing. At that point, the fear of collapse will be what we drive them to. But wait a minute, at that point the whole world will ask, 'What are you, occupiers?' The world will say nothing; they’ll say we are defending ourselves. Aren't you afraid of the world? No, not especially now, with America. I know what America is. America is something that can be easily moved, moved in the right direction. They won’t bother us. Even if they say something to us, so what? 80% of Americans support us—it’s absurd! We have such great support there, and yet we ask ourselves, what should we do with it? Look, the previous administration under Clinton was extremely pro-Palestinian, but I wasn’t afraid to maneuver. I didn’t fear confrontation with Clinton or clashes with the UN. Since I’m already paying the price in the international arena, I might as well get something of equal value in exchange. But never mind that—we gave them things, and we can’t take them back because they won’t return them. First of all, Oslo is a system of agreements. You’re right, I don’t know what we can or cannot take back from the Palestinians. He has strong political opinions, believe me. And he’s right. He said things to Arik Sharon that I told him weren’t a child’s opinions. The Oslo Accords are a disaster. Yes, I know that, and you know that, but the people need to know. Right, but I thought the prime minister knew too, and that he would avoid doing critical things like handing over Hebron. What were the Oslo Accords? The Knesset signed them, and I was asked before the elections, 'Will you follow them?' I said yes, subject to reciprocity and limiting withdrawals. But how do you limit withdrawals? I interpret the accords in such a way that allows me to stop the rush toward the '67 borders. The Oslo Accords stipulated that Israel would gradually hand over territories to the Palestinians, except where there were settlements or military sites. This is where I found a loophole—no one defined military sites. So I said that security zones, like the Jordan Valley, were military sites. Then the question arose: who defines what a military site is? I received a letter, addressed to both me and Arafat, which said that only Israel would define the location and size of military sites. They didn’t want to give me this letter, so I refused to sign the Hebron Agreement. I stopped the government meeting and said, 'I’m not signing.' Only when the letter came, addressed to both me and Arafat, did I ratify the Hebron Agreement. This mattered because, at that moment, I effectively stopped the Oslo Accords. And yet, one of our own people, who knew it was a swindle and that we were committing suicide with Oslo, gave them Hebron anyway. I never understood that. Indeed, Hebron hurts. It’s painful. One of the famous rabbis whom I respect said to me, 'What would your father say?' I went to my father. Do you know my father’s position? He’s not exactly a dove, as they say. My father told me to tell the rabbi that my grandfather, Rabbi Natan Milikowski, was a smart Jew. He said, 'It’s better to give up two percent than a hundred percent. That’s the choice here. You gave two percent, and in doing so, you stopped the withdrawal instead of giving up everything.' The trick isn’t to break down, but to be there and pay a minimal price. May you say that as prime minister. In my estimation, that will happen."