A Kill List of Seven Countries in Five Years

A Kill List of Seven Countries in Five Years
America is standing in the way of world peace with a kill list of seven countries in five years as pointed out by General Wesley Clark.

Christians are funding and supporting Zionists who are killing Christians and other non Zionists and the American people are silent.

US Congress is in the hands of Israel's stooges This episode of Unscripted interviews Jeffrey David Sachs, an American economist and public policy analyst, about the meeting between Iran and the E3, the 12-day war between Iran and Israel, US hostility against Iran, US-Israeli plans for the Middle East and wars in the region, the two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and much more.

What is the Benjamin Netanyahu Clean Break Doctrine in 1996 that gave us the General Wesley Clark Seven Countries in Five Years Kill List?

Netanyahu seems to be the main mover in America's official adoption of the 1996 white paper A Clean Break, authored by him and American fellow neocons, which aimed to aggressively remake the strategic environments of Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran.

Google AI Overview

The "Clean Break Doctrine" is the common name for the 1996 policy paper A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. It was drafted by a neoconservative-led study group for Benjamin Netanyahu, who was entering his first term as Israeli Prime Minister. The document advocated for Israel to abandon the "land for peace" strategy and adopt a more proactive, aggressive military and diplomatic approach to reshape the Middle East.

Core components and recommendations
The paper presented several recommendations to counter Israel's perceived security threats:

Destabilize regional rivals: The document proposed destabilizing and "rolling back" regimes hostile to Israel, particularly in Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq. It specifically advocated for the removal of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.

Shift Palestinian strategy: It recommended changing Israel's relationship with the Palestinians by reasserting security control, including the right of "hot pursuit" into Palestinian-controlled areas. It also sought to undermine Yasir Arafat's leadership by promoting alternatives.

Build new alliances: The paper suggested building new regional alliances, specifically with Turkey and Jordan, to create a counterweight to other Arab states.

Re-establish preemption: It urged Israel to re-establish the principle of preemptive action rather than simply retaliating after an attack.
Context and influence

A product of neoconservative thought: While prepared for Netanyahu, the report was a product of an Israeli think tank with strong ties to American neoconservatives. Its recommendations aligned with the broader neoconservative goal of reordering the Middle East.

Resonated with U.S. policymakers: The paper's ideas resonated with U.S. neoconservatives and influenced some American foreign policy discussions, particularly regarding regime change in Iraq. Critics argue this contributed to regional instability and helped build the case for the 2003 Iraq War.

Actual impact on Netanyahu's policy: It is unclear to what extent Netanyahu formally adopted the doctrine. Some of its more controversial recommendations were reportedly rejected. However, critics argue that the aggressive, security-first approach described in the paper has been a hallmark of his long-term policy.

Long-term debate
The Clean Break document remains a subject of controversy and debate. Supporters view it as a necessary and vital strategy for ensuring Israel's security, while critics condemn its aggressive recommendations for fueling regional instability and militarism. The report is often cited in discussions concerning the evolution of Israeli and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.

Google AI Overview

General Wesley Clark did not visit seven countries in five years; rather, he proposed that the United States military should invade seven countries in the Middle East within a five-year period, starting with Iraq, following the collapse of the Soviet Union. He stated this during a May 1992 meeting with the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Paul Wolfowitz, though the accuracy and intent of this alleged proposal are debated.

Details of the Alleged Proposal:
What was proposed:
According to Clark, the US military could take advantage of the post-Cold War power vacuum to destabilize and overthrow governments in the Middle East.

Which countries were mentioned:
Clark named Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Libya.

Why it was proposed:
The purpose was to dismantle states that were perceived as potential threats to US interests, creating a favorable strategic position for America.

Source of the information:
The information comes from Clark himself, who described this conversation in interviews and during his presidential campaign.

Context and Controversy:
Debate over intent:
Critics question whether Clark was serious about the proposal, suggesting it was a rhetorical exercise or a serious strategic concept.

Subsequent events:
Some observers have connected the proposal to later US military actions, such as the Iraq War, though Clark claims he later opposed the invasion of Iraq.

Further reading:
General Clark on Paul Wolfowitz and the Seven Countries in Five Years plan- The Nation Wesley Clark's "Seven Countries in Five Years" Plan - Video from The Nation

Join the Weekly Video Call
Call 305-333-1925