Soros, Clinton and the Great Manipulation: A Plan to Attribute Fraud to Trump

In the recently declassified documents—part of the annex of Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation—an alarming story emerges for American democracy. Emails allegedly directed by senior officials of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations reveal a coordinated plan by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to falsely link Donald Trump to Russia, with the goal of diverting attention from her private email scandal.

The messages attributed to Leonard Benardo, senior vice president of the foundation, are devastating: “this will be a long-term issue” to “demonize Putin and Trump,” and once the narrative took hold, “the FBI will throw more fuel on the fire.” Another line indicates that Hillary Clinton gave the green light to the plan of using those allegations as a distraction from her missing emails. This scheme was accompanied by the hope that the accusations of collusion with Russia would divert attention away from her own legal troubles.

Most alarming is that the FBI received this intelligence and ignored it, continuing with the Russian interference narrative without properly investigating the evidence pointing to a possible setup by the Democratic campaign. This not only taints the integrity of the Clinton campaign but also the institutional framework of the State, exposing a covert political strategy.

Context and Clear Implications

These findings confirm what many had long suspected: the “Russia-Trump” narrative was artificially fueled by the Democratic campaign, with the support of both the media apparatus and government institutions. The fact that Louis Benardo and Jeffrey Goldstein, Soros officials, participated in conversations with DNC leadership and Clinton advisers—such as Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Julianne Smith—demonstrates the depth and disgraceful planning behind this deception.

Furthermore, the FBI’s silence in the face of this scheme proves that certain state organs were used as political tools to discredit Trump, while simultaneously covering up Clinton’s internal scandals.

Where Was Obama?

What is most outrageous is that during the investigation, senior members of the Obama administration—including the then-Attorney General and the CIA—were aware of this operation. Yet nothing was done. This suggests a deliberate use of the institutional apparatus for political ends.

Consequences for Democracy

Covert political manipulation: The combination of private foundations, political campaigns, and federal entities working together to fabricate narratives is an affront to transparency.

Loss of public trust: If the FBI and intelligence services ignored a possible deceptive maneuver, how can the public trust their official assessments?

Moral failure of the system: Using government agencies for propaganda purposes is a form of corruption with lasting consequences.

Conclusion: A Dangerous Course Must Be Corrected

These declassified documents from the Durham report reveal a story the nation cannot ignore. Hillary Clinton’s campaign, with George Soros’ influence, devised a propaganda operation to distract from her own scandals.

The Trump administration, by contrast, is committed to repairing the damage, restoring transparency, and healing the cracks of distrust in our institutions. Democracy demands accountability, not cover-ups. The truth matters. And the American people deserve to know it.