Question Time - Patriots vs Elites

1 month ago
3

SUMMARY:
------------------------------
I’m buzzing to share this lively Q&A from our Patriots vs Elites event — a real grassroots evening where people came to ask direct, tough questions. The session opens with clear ground rules (one question per person, state your intended speaker) and quickly gets into it. Bob asks Peter Spenser about Pauline Hanson’s trial and whether the jury was truly a jury of peers. Peter fires back passionately, arguing the jury was ‘concocted’ and reduced to a puppet meant to protect today’s elites rather than ordinary citizens. The conversation pivots to faith when another audience member asks if our problems are spiritual. Peter answers with a moving, personal story about his daughter and his deep, sustaining belief in God — a heartfelt reminder that conviction and compassion sit alongside the political debate. If you want candid commentary, real people asking real questions, and speakers who respond plainly and passionately, this clip delivers. Watch, share and join the conversation — it’s Australian, raw and unfiltered.

RUMBLE DESCRIPTION:
-----------------------------------
Welcome to the Question & Answer session from our Patriots vs Elites meeting — a short, sharp slice of grassroots politics and personal testimony. We set the tone at the start: one question per person, tell us which speaker you want to address, and step up to the mic. No stagecraft, no polished lines — just citizens getting stuck in.

Highlights in this clip: Bob directs a pointed question to Peter Spenser about Pauline Hanson’s trial — was the jury really representative, or just window-dressing for the elites? Peter doesn’t hold back. He argues that the jury system was subverted, explaining why a true jury of peers is meant to be a bulwark against an emerging aristocracy. He spells out his concerns about jury construction and the loss of common-law protections.

The tone shifts when another attendee asks whether our problems are spiritual. Peter’s reply is unexpectedly personal: an honest account about his family, grief and a deep faith in God that helps him keep going. It’s a human moment in a political evening — emotion, conviction and thoughtful reflection.

If you value frank public debate, real questions from the floor, and answers that mix law, politics and personal belief, this is for you. Leave your thoughts below, subscribe for more community events, and share with friends who want politics with heart. We’re keen to hear your take — civil, respectful discussion is welcome. Support grassroots conversation — share, comment and join the channel.

⚠️ CONTENT DISCLAIMER ⚠️
The views, opinions, and statements expressed in this video are those of the individual speaker(s) and audience members. They do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of Western Heritage Australia or its affiliates.

This content is presented for educational and informational purposes as well as to facilitate public discourse on important social and political issues. We provide a platform for diverse Australian voices to be heard, to assist the public in forming their own informed opinions.

Western Heritage Australia does not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the accuracy of statements made by speakers. All claims, statistics, and opinions remain the responsibility of the original speaker. Viewers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult multiple sources when forming opinions on these topics.

This video may contain strong political opinions, controversial viewpoints, strong language, or mature themes. Viewer discretion is advised.

Loading comments...