Den Tarragon/John Wanoa Case Closed - Den Tarragon Concedes Defeat.

For years, Den Tarragon has been a loud voice pushing the claim that John Wanoa was a scammer and that the Moai Power House share sale was nothing but a fraudulent con. His narrative relied on bold accusations, repeated often, but never backed with verifiable evidence.

At the heart of Tarragon’s argument was a claim that Jason Warr had purchased shares and sent money to John Wanoa. This was his cornerstone proof — his “gotcha” moment. Yet, when pressed for actual evidence, that claim collapsed completely. Jason Warr himself confirmed he did not buy shares and did not send money to John Wanoa.

Presented with this indisputable evidence, Den Tarragon had nowhere to go. His reply was not a defence, not a counter-argument, not even an attempt to provide alternative evidence. Instead, he simply muttered:

“Have it your way, Matt.”

That phrase is telling. It is the language of retreat, of conceding defeat without admitting it outright. It is the moment the mask slips and the bluff is called.

The Tactics of a Lost Argument.

Tarragon’s behaviour is textbook for someone losing an argument:

Making bold claims without evidence. Repeating them until people assume they must be true.

Shifting the goalposts. When one point is dismantled, introducing a new, unrelated accusation.

Threats and intimidation. When facts fail, resorting to warnings about “going to the nonce police” or “airing secrets.”

Deflection. When cornered, brushing aside the discussion with dismissive phrases like “have it your way.”

None of this changes the core fact: his central claim has been disproven.

What This Means.

Den Tarragon has no verifiable evidence to back up his accusations. His cornerstone example — that Jason Warr sent money to John Wanoa — has been exposed as false.

This is more than just a personal victory. It is a wider lesson about how misinformation spreads. People like Tarragon shout loudly, wrap themselves in the banner of “truth,” and repeat lies until an audience starts to believe them. But when challenged with facts, they have nothing to stand on.

The concession has been made. The evidence is in. The scam was never real.