Brian Wilshire - Agenda 21 - Environmentalism vs Private Property

SUMMARY:
------------------------------
Absolutely thrilled to share this clip of Brian Wilshire — the legendary 2GB broadcaster and author — speaking plainly and passionately about Agenda 21, sustainability and what he sees as a clash between environmentalism and private property. Brian mixes sharp radio-honed wit and real-world anecdotes (including a cracker of a listener story) with some provocative takes: the UN’s potential role in migration and resource allocation, the risk to landholders if large population shifts occur, and sceptical views on mainstream climate narratives — CO2 lag after warming, references to the Climategate emails and the Michael Mann “hockey stick” debate. He even riffs on long-term ice-age cycles, fantastical fixes like space mirrors, and how policy responses might threaten property rights. It’s combative, entertaining and thought-provoking. If you care about property rights, climate policy or just love a good, blunt broadcast voice, this is a must-watch. Leave your thoughts in the comments — I want to hear what you reckon.

RUMBLE DESCRIPTION:
-----------------------------------
Loved having Brian Wilshire join us — one of Australia’s most recognisable radio voices (2GB, started at 2NZ in 1969 and author of four books). Brian came along to talk about Agenda 21, sustainability and the tension he believes exists between environmentalism and private property. He opens with a few classic Wilshire anecdotes (including a funny listener email about pills and ‘kitchen dragons’) which set the tone: entertaining, candid and straight-talking.

From there he moves into heavier territory. Brian outlines scenarios where long-term climate cycles, migration and international action (he mentions the UN) could put property rights under serious pressure. He talks about CO2 lag after warming periods, the Climategate email revelations and the controversy around Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph — arguing that the science and the storytelling around it deserve scrutiny. He also raises provocative hypothetical fixes (think space mirrors) and warns about policy decisions made in panic that might erode individual land ownership.

This video isn’t a polished, academic lecture — it’s an old-school broadcaster delivering an opinionated, colourful take on a complex debate. Expect humour, scepticism and a lot to think about. If you’re into free-speech radio style discussions, property-rights issues or climate policy debates, hit play. Drop a comment with your view, share if you found it useful and subscribe for more talks and interviews like this. Keen to know what you reckon — agree, disagree or somewhere in between?

⚠️ CONTENT DISCLAIMER ⚠️
The views, opinions, and statements expressed in this video are those of the individual speaker(s) and audience members. They do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of Western Heritage Australia or its affiliates.

This content is presented for educational and informational purposes as well as to facilitate public discourse on important social and political issues. We provide a platform for diverse Australian voices to be heard, to assist the public in forming their own informed opinions.

Western Heritage Australia does not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the accuracy of statements made by speakers. All claims, statistics, and opinions remain the responsibility of the original speaker. Viewers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult multiple sources when forming opinions on these topics.

This video may contain strong political opinions, controversial viewpoints, strong language, or mature themes. Viewer discretion is advised.