Karl Popper is WRONG Not Just Wrong but DANGEROUS: Philosophy of Science

10 days ago
10

Popper accepts the Humean critique of induction, and indeed, goes beyond it in arguing that induction is never actually used in science.

Popper provides no empirical evidence to show why his ideas are better or why we should reject Bacon's ideas

Please Support My Channel, so I can continue making videos about the Greatest Politician and Economist of the 21st Century.

Bitcoin Address: bc1q92yxpj0ctwklhq22tda3xgjmwyn9350m2kytak
Solana Address: 8vRfiTbq2j88g5sfeSCH3YPjssvLSgVX8v1ezNoMjVrZ
Ethereum Address: 0xafc989b220027562d4952005C8aA7dA803b59703

Monero Address:
85amnvzApX4LxUTegytRK5bosN2TqyHXz9AwCttA5W1u57hrHKxqqCgRDuQXQxczVGQrwiZ4T2UQFC9bkrXqvXvT38MmGjG

Loading 1 comment...