Desecration in Wales... Read on below.

In Llandudno, North Wales, a Christian cross that had stood atop Great Orme hill for more than 50 years was dismantled by a group of Jewish youths in Orthodox dress. The stones were then rearranged into a Star of David.

Locals reacted with outrage, describing the act as provocative and deeply disrespectful. Volunteers quickly restored the cross, which had long been part of the town’s landscape.

One thing is clear: if the roles were reversed, this story would be splashed across every major outlet as “hate crime.” Instead, it has been largely brushed aside.

The cross stands again today, thanks not to officials, but to ordinary people who refused to let a landmark of faith be trampled.

Jew Deception runs deep.

The Manufactured Myth of “Judeo-Christian Values”

We’ve somehow grown accustomed to this phrase and many no longer question it, but the notion does not descend from scripture, it was a 20th-century political invention.

In the 1930s–50s, American elites built a “tri-faith” identity: Protestant, Catholic, Jew, in order to (supposedly) unify the country against fascism and then against communism. The National Conference of Christians and Jews (NCCJ) literally toured America with its famous “Tolerance Trios,” where a priest, a minister, and a rabbi stood on stage preaching the tri-faith concept. Out of that PR campaign came a new phrase: “Judeo-Christian values.”

None other than George Orwell picked up the phrase in 1939–41 when he spoke of the “Judaeo-Christian scheme of morals.” By the 1940s and ’50s, it had become part of America’s civil religion. Eisenhower invoked it in speeches, and sociologist Will Herberg’s 1955 book Protestant–Catholic–Jew cemented it as the cultural template.

The purpose of this cultural campaign was to blur what are essentially irreconcilable doctrines.

Judaism denies the central claims of Christianity: that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and the path to salvation. Christianity, on the other hand, sees the old covenant as fulfilled in Christ, and the new covenant as binding for all. The Jewish covenant rests on obedience to the Law and justice as reciprocity; “an eye for an eye, whereas Christianity overturns that with grace, forgiveness, and the radical command to “turn the other cheek.” Where Judaism looks to a Messiah still to come, Christianity testifies that He has already come and fulfilled the law. One emphasizes ritual and separation; the other proclaims universality and the breaking down of barriers.

These are not superficial disagreements; they are entirely different moral worlds, yet the phrase “Judeo-Christian values” was designed precisely to conceal this gulf and present a false unity.

Just as the Scofield Bible rewired American evangelicals to see the rebirth of Israel as God’s plan, the “Judeo-Christian values” narrative worked in the public square to normalize the idea that Jews and Christians were fundamentally aligned. Together, these twin projects made it natural for Christians to support the establishment of Israel in 1948, and to accept unconditional U.S. backing ever since.

By 1969, Jewish thinker Arthur A. Cohen called the whole construct what it was: “The Myth of the Judeo-Christian Tradition.” A myth, however, with a purpose: to secure Christian support of Israel.

So when politicians invoke “Judeo-Christian values” today, remember the history. It was never a timeless religious truth.