Transvestigation 2/2: Is Brigitte Macron a man?

This analysis considers the allegation by Candace Owens—drawing on “years of research” by “investigative journalist” Xavier Poussard—that Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady of France, is secretly a man. Because it apparently takes years of research for some journalists to figure out the sex of a person. The case is so sensational and counterfactual, and Owens has so little access to information, that it gives to question if she was not naively tipped by an agent to destroy her career. To obtain a passport, which the first lady of France surely has, requires a birth certificate indicating one’s sex at birth. However, this evidence counts for nothing apparently. That legions of lawyers, politicians and journalists raised and cannot quell the controversy reveals the machinations and failure of the “system” and these professions, compared to science. Owens claims to be fighting the “elites”. However, the so-called “elites” want people to be dumb and distracted. Certainly, this case does nothing to raise public IQ or consciousness of significant information. Moreover, Owens and her peers on social media were never a threat to the so-called “Matrix”. In her video response to the Macrons’ lawsuit, she merely confesses her malice by stating that it is “fun to do bad things” and “hood rat stuff” at the risk of harming others. Of genuine concern is why Brigitte’s sex is even a question; let alone a debate; let alone one of such magnitude, lucre and stakes. The answer, as just noted, is because the system (that is, the nexus of media, law and politics) is pernicious, wasteful and imminently replaceable by a checkup. Owens also seems to be oblivious to the fact this is a presidential lawsuit. There are politics involved. If an American court rules against the Macrons, even if they are wrong, it would have an impact on America’s relationship to France. Owens is also unlikely to encounter a sympathetic judge or jury in Delaware, which is a strongly blue state. Like Nicolas Fuentes and the Tate brothers, Owens built her career serving Zionists and white supremacists. Basically, when they see Shekels, they bow to their masters and attack and insult their enemies. Then, when they see shackles and fall under Zionist crosshairs, with their careers and reputations—and even their lives—in jeopardy, they curse Jews and Israel in the hopes that the same people whom they attacked and insulted, like the Catholic Church or Muslims, will support them and that it will appear as if they were targeted because of principled opposition to the Palestinian genocide; not for serving the wrong masters. However, they will be disappointed to find that the Catholic Church is also in cahoots with Zionists (see, e.g., Epstein’s relationship to Pope John Paul II). Indeed, they may all end up converting to Islam like Andrew Tate in a desperate attempt to save themselves from their former masters, against whom there is no other support or resistance.

0:00 Outline
0:15 Claims
3:57 Law and facts
5:08 Analysis
13:30 Conclusion