Premium Only Content

Misrepresentation Claim Requires Production of Representation
Not Wise to Attempt Rescission Without Evidence
Post 5173
Desiree Durga and Justin Durga v. Memberselect Insurance Company, No. 371891, Court of Appeals of Michigan (August 13, 2025) Desiree Durga and Justin Durga (plaintiffs) claimed the insurer wrongfully attempted to rescind an auto policy.
THE ALLEGATIONS
The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant breached their automobile insurance contract by rescinding their policy based on an allegation of fraudulent misrepresentation in the application process. The rescission was attempted because plaintiff Justin Durga had two or more substance abuse convictions in seven years, his Michigan operator's license was mandatorily revoked from June 9, 2007 "until requirements have been met."
While defendant MemberSelect claimed that Desiree Durga's application for insurance contained a material misrepresentation, it did not produce a copy of the June 2012 application. In fact defendant admitted the application for insurance no longer exists.
Trial Court Decision
The trial court granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary disposition on their breach of contract claim and denied the defendant's cross-motion for summary disposition, which argued that it was entitled to rescind the policy. The court found that the defendant failed to provide clear and convincing evidence of fraud and that the plaintiffs had disclosed that Justin Durga did not have a valid driver's license. The court also noted that the defendant's reliance on underwriting guidelines that were not made available to the plaintiffs was not sufficient to support their claim .
The court ultimately affirmed the trial court's decision, granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $82,476.04.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Insurance policies are contracts and, in the absence of an applicable statute, are subject to the same contract construction principles that apply to any other species of contract. An insurance policy must be enforced in accordance with its terms, which are given their commonly used meaning if not defined in the policy
Seeking Policy Rescission Based Upon Alleged Fraud In The Application Or Procurement Process
MemberSelect asserted the common law defense of fraudulent misrepresentation in plaintiff's application for or procurement of the subject automobile insurance policy allowed it rescission of the policy ab initio in order to avoid its contractual obligations to pay on plaintiffs' claim.
Because a claim to rescind a transaction is equitable in nature, it is not strictly a matter of right but is granted only in the sound discretion of the court.
The insurer, as the party asserting entitlement to the defense of fraudulent misrepresentation, bears the burden of proving the elements of rescission. At best, the question seeking license status of a proposed insured was ambiguous, such that it is construed against the drafter in favor of coverage. As a result the representation made by the plaintiffs did not constitute a false representation for purposes of establishing that prima facie element of a fraud in the application rescission claim.
DEFENDANT IS NOT ENTITLED TO RESCISSION
When people seek to procure insurance by making a clear material misrepresentation to the insurance company, thereby entitling the insurance carrier to rescind the subject policies of insurance, the insurer must produce admissible evidence of the misrepresentation. Not only has defendant not provided clear and convincing evidence of fraud in this case defendant provided no evidence of fraud. Therefore, it was not entitled to rescission.
ZALMA OPINION
Rescission is an equitable remedy that seeks to deal fairly with both parties to the insurance contract. The insurer claimed that the Durgas lied on the application which they could not produce because it did not exist. An insurer seeking rescission must do so fairly and in good faith with clear and unambiguous evidence of the misrepresentation. The insurer failed when it was unable to produce the allegedly false application.
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk.
-
8:29
Insurance Law
12 days agoThe Dick Law Firm and its Client Sanctioned
39 -
LIVE
JULIE GREEN MINISTRIES
53 minutes agoLIVE WITH JULIE
13,155 watching -
26:39
Producer Michael
18 hours agoMY $32,000 EMIRATES FIRST CLASS FLIGHT!
18.8K2 -
48:21
The Confessionals
19 hours agoPossessed by the Gods? The Truth About Avatars w/ Jonathan Cahn
2.39K3 -
36:34
The Finance Hub
16 hours ago $1.29 earnedBREAKING: BILL CLINTON'S EPSTEIN TIES JUST GOT RELEASED!!!
4.05K5 -
LIVE
BEK TV
22 hours agoTrent Loos in the Morning - 9/10/2025
281 watching -
LIVE
The Bubba Army
21 hours agoFeds STEP IN on Charlotte Stabbing Case - Bubba the Love Sponge® Show | 9/10/25
3,920 watching -
LIVE
FyrBorne
10 hours ago🔴Warzone M&K Sniping: An Old Meta Returns To Cut Down The Competition
66 watching -
25:54
ZeeeMedia
13 hours agoThe Shadow Government, Mask Plague, Nepal Uprising Topples Government | Daily Pulse Ep 104
13K23 -
LIVE
Biscotti-B23
6 hours ago $0.06 earned🔴 LIVE DRAGON BALL GEKISHIN SQUADRA IS HERE 🐉 RANKED MATCHES & BATTLE PASS SHOWCASE
37 watching