RAGE QUIT #2 OF SATURDAY NIGHT

2 months ago
28

Option 1: “True Crime… Eventually”
Tonight’s stream is a roller coaster: audio check ✅, flashing-warning (belated) ✅, and then straight into creator cage-match. Expect legal cosplay (RICO! “paperwork’s on the way!”), strike-happy pep talks, and enough shout-outs to power a telethon. We do attempt true-crime updates (Kohberger, Times Square, a grab bag of cases)… before swerving back into beef, memberships, and missing links. Come for the cases, stay for the chaos.
Content note: strong language, creator drama, zero chill.

Option 2: “Second Stream, Same Energy”
Part two of the night and the carnival lights are still on. We’ve got: accusations flying, threats of “see you in court,” a whiteboard moment we can’t unsee, and repeated calls to smash that like/join button to fuel the lawyer fund. Also: brief detours into actual cases, promptly derailed by beef. If you’re here for receipts, they arrive “later.” If you’re here for spectacle, you’re right on time.

Option 3 (Short & punchy)
Creator drama with a side of true crime. Legal talk without the legal docs. Big promises, bigger pivots. Strong language. Seatbelts on.
#truecrimecommunity #cramacommunity #awbj
26:56–27:21 – Vulgar “these nuts… on your chin” bit held up on a whiteboard. Sets an antagonistic tone; not exactly “true-crime coverage.”

27:38–28:04 – “Evidence is mounted… paperwork’s on the way… you’re going to court.” Legal chest-thumping without specifics; feels like intimidation, not information.

29:01–29:13 – Epilepsy/flashing warning arrives after the flashy intro. If true, that’s a safety red flag.

29:53–30:24 – Coordinating strikes against another channel (“strike her again… we expect you to”). Reads like brigading/ToS-risky behavior.

31:06–31:11 – “The paper’s coming.” Reiterates threat posture rather than moving to evidence.

32:06–32:45 – Unverified “RICO” talk + direct insults (“dumb motherf—”). Big claims, zero sourcing.

33:09–33:26 – Accusation that critics have a “bingo card” of someone’s personal info. If accurate, that hints at doxxing; if not, it’s incendiary hearsay.

34:1334:32 & 41:5442:16 – Frequent “thumbs up / become a member” pushes—especially alongside legal drama—look like monetizing conflict. Mentions of “how close we are” without numbers = transparency gap.

35:32–36:10 – Sweeping claims about Dubai being half-finished/ghetto. Off-topic and unsourced.

39:14–40:53 – Rapid-fire sensational crimes with little verification/context. Headline-surfing, not reporting.

43:12–43:29 – Clarifies “served” ≠ showing up at someone’s house. Useful, but it follows earlier escalation that muddied that line.

46:09–47:28 – Claims “Kohberger submitted four possible new suspects” per court docs. That’s a big assertion with no citation—prime candidate for misinformation unless sourced.

49:24–49:33 – “My last stream is… hidden.” Suggests moderation/demonetization concerns; raises questions about why.

52:30–53:12 – “Take it to the media,” “Kiwi Farms,” “FBI territory.” Heavy rhetoric, no receipts shown.

58:121:01:22 – “I’m not a scammer,” then reads a dictionary definition. Self-exoneration without evidence; later pivots to accusing others about “billboard money” (1:02:031:02:11)—again, no proof offered.

📌 FULL LIVE HERE -

📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

Loading comments...