Bending The Ruler - Time Travel, The Speed of Light, Gravity, and The Big Bang

26 days ago
20

Bending The Ruler - Time Travel, The Speed of Light, Gravity and The Big Bang
Challenge your assumptions and explore alternative theories of everything

#short #bigbang #gravity #timetravel #thespeedoflight #thebigbang #bendingtheruler

Bending The Ruler - Time Travel, The Speed of Light, Gravity, and The Big Bang
https://www.amazon.com/Bending-Ruler-Travel-Speed-Gravity/dp/0989331881

Thank You God - Finding Gratitude in Hard Times
https://www.amazon.com/Thank-You-God-Finding-Gratitude/dp/0989331873

The Science Of God Volume 1 - The First Four Days
https://www.amazon.com/Science-God-First-Four-Days/dp/1956814248

The Science Of God Volume 2 - Gravity, Land, Seas, and Evolution of Plant
https://www.amazon.com/Science-God-Gravity-Evolution-Plants/dp/1956814264

The Science Of God Volume 3 - Day Five and Day Six - The Creatures - Revolution or Evolution
https://www.amazon.com/Science-God-Creatures-Revolution-Evolution/dp/1956814280

The Science Of God Volume 4 - Day Six - Evolution versus Man - In Our Image
https://www.amazon.com/Science-God-Evolution-versus-Image/dp/B0CHL7DLBR

The Science Of God Volume 5 - Boats, Floods, and Noah - The Deluge
https://www.amazon.com/Science-God-Boats-Floods-Deluge/dp/B0CJDF9Z66

The Big Bang theory and redshift interpretation have long been accepted pillars of modern cosmology. However, increasing numbers of scientists and researchers are beginning to question the accuracy and assumptions behind these models. We explore the major failures of the Big Bang theory and problems with redshift interpretation that are forcing many to reconsider our understanding of the universe.

One of the most cited failures of the Big Bang theory is the horizon problem. According to the theory, different regions of the universe should not have had enough time to exchange information or energy, yet the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation is remarkably uniform in all directions. To fix this, cosmologists introduced inflation theory, an untestable idea that space itself expanded faster than the speed of light. But rather than solving the problem, inflation raises even more questions and adds complexity to the model.

The Big Bang theory predicts a universe that should have quickly curved into either a “closed” or “open” geometry. Instead, observations show a flat universe, balanced on a knife’s edge. This incredible fine-tuning is considered statistically improbable without some unknown mechanism or tuning—again, inflation is used to “patch” this inconsistency.

The Big Bang model heavily relies on dark matter and dark energy—mysterious substances that have never been directly observed. Combined, they make up about 95% of the universe under the standard model, yet no conclusive evidence exists for their physical properties. Critics argue this is akin to inventing unseen forces to keep a flawed theory alive, rather than admitting the model may need revision.

Redshift is the idea that galaxies moving away from us shift light toward the red end of the spectrum—is the cornerstone of the expanding universe theory. But this interpretation assumes redshift is caused only by motion (Doppler effect or cosmological expansion). Alternative theories like tired light, intrinsic redshift, or plasma cosmology suggest that redshift might result from other mechanisms, such as interaction with intergalactic matter.

Notably, Halton Arp, a prominent astronomer, documented cases of high-redshift quasars physically connected to low-redshift galaxies, directly contradicting the standard redshift-distance relationship. These findings have been largely dismissed by mainstream cosmology but continue to spark debate.

The Big Bang predicts matter and antimatter should have been created in equal amounts. Yet the observable universe contains almost no antimatter. Where did it go? The lack of a compelling explanation remains a major unresolved issue.

While the Big Bang theory and redshift remain central to cosmology, there are growing concerns and evidence pointing to serious theoretical failures. Whether due to fine-tuning, reliance on unobservable entities, or conflicting observations, many scientists argue it's time to re-examine our cosmological models.

This book looks at other views in a simplified language for most everyone to understand.

Loading comments...