7th Amendment Suit At Common Law

This is THE MOST OVERLOOKED right we have!

Without this right, there is NO REMEDY.

None. Zero.

There is only tyranny left.

How so Gianna???

Have you seen government agencies that use resources, man power, or weaponry to suppress the people's dissent, disagreement, or prevent the free exercise of your rights?

We have hundreds of cases in our University!

We also have at least 40 people who have filed 7th Amendment right suits at common law in our Federal District Courts where 18 judges have weaponized their posistions to kick the cases based on NOTHING but their own tyrannical control!

The entire American Legal System is REPUGNANT to the Constitution.

There is literally no court that honors our 7th Amendment and we're at the precipice in time, where literally NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT IT.

Even the top so called legal minds such as John Eastman, Alan Dershowitz, Rudy Giuliani, Donald Trump's dream team of Alina Habba does not employ this right!

Why not?

Because the big secret is that there are TWO LEGAL SYSTEMS.

And the BAR association has been erasing the common law for easily 100 years.

But last year in 2024, it was brought to the light via two monumental cases.

The reversal of the Chevron deference and the SEC v Jarkesy.

The Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024), which overruled Chevron declared:

In Loper Bright, the Court said Chevron deference violates the separation of powers and that courts must interpret the law independently.

That ruling restored a more traditional common law/judicial role in statutory interpretation — bringing back judicial primacy.

What is judicial primacy?

I had that question too!

Judicial primacy is the principle that courts — not administrative agencies or other branches of government — have the final authority to interpret the law, especially statutes and the Constitution.

But a court is not a court on the surface.

There are many KINDS of courts and that's what Loeper & Jarkesy established.

Anything that is not of Article III from the Constitutuion, is by default, Article I administrative.

Let's go a little deeper.

Legislators of any politicial subdiviaion CAN ONLY legistlate....COMMERCE!

You are not in commerce.

You are never in commerce!

Only corporations are in commerce!

So they use LEGAL FOCKERY to get YOU to be the AGENT for the legal entity, IN COMMERCE!

In More Detail, the Loper Bright case revealed:

Under judicial primacy, judges — particularly in Article III courts — are the ultimate interpreters of legal meaning.

This principle aligns with separation of powers, where:

Legislatures make the law,

Executives enforce the law,

And judiciaries interpret the law.

Why It Matters

Judicial primacy matters because it:

Preserves constitutional balance: Prevents executive agencies from both interpreting and enforcing laws unchecked.

Protects individual rights: Ensures that neutral courts, not political agencies, resolve disputes.

This ruling maintains rule of law: Guarantees that law has a fixed meaning determined by courts, not fluctuating with agency leadership.

From the Jarkesy case:

Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Thomas, wrote separately to emphasize constitutional protections that he believes the SEC violated when it brought enforcement actions in its own administrative courts.

Key Themes in Gorsuch's Concurrence:

Right to a Jury Trial (7th Amendment):Gorsuch strongly reinforces the idea that when the government seeks penalties akin to those available in common law (like fines), individuals are entitled to a jury trial.

"The Seventh Amendment guarantees a right to a jury trial in all 'suits at common law' where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars. That right belongs to the individual. It is not the government’s to give or take away."

Due Process Concerns:He warns against letting agencies act as prosecutor, judge, and jury. In his view, this threatens fairness and liberty.

“The Due Process Clause promises a neutral decisionmaker—something administrative tribunals often cannot provide when an agency serves as both prosecutor and judge.”

Separation of Powers:Gorsuch stresses that allowing agencies to adjudicate core private rights disrupts the Constitution’s design:

“The Constitution does not permit the government to sidestep the judicial process when attempting to strip individuals of property or liberty.”

Critique of Agency Procedure:He contrasts agency adjudications with Article III courts, noting how they lack robust evidentiary rules, full discovery, and jury trials.

“The government’s case is prosecuted and judged by the same agency … procedural protections are a far cry from those found in Article III courts.”

Our rights ONLY EXIST in Article III courts.

Everything else is administrative, which requires a contract and your consent to do business with the LEGAL ENTITY you are unknowingly acting on the behalf of.

How they get you:

The driver's license.

Your consent through coercion like an IRS form.

From your signature on a social security card. (You can have it but don't knon how to use it.)

There can be many more, I just gave a sample.

This is why it's imperative to read my book, "Free-Dumb, The Patriot's Playbook to Restoring Your Rights & Freedom."

Join the fight at https://InalienableUniversity.com