The Gov & Soc Media Loves to Censor, So Why Can We Find Child Porn On Most Any Soc Media Platform

Section 230: Shield or Loophole? The Battle Over Big Tech, Censorship & Child Safety

Originally passed in 1996, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act was meant to protect tech platforms by classifying them as neutral "billboards"—not publishers. But in today’s digital world, that same law is shielding platforms from responsibility while child sexual abuse material (CSAM) spreads unchecked.

In this explosive discussion, we ask the hard questions:

🧱 What is Section 230, and why was it created?

⚖️ Has it become a loophole for tech giants to avoid accountability?

🧒 Why can users still find child exploitation content on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Snap?

🚨 What reforms are needed to protect children online while preserving free speech?

🇺🇸 Can Section 230 be amended or sunset for a safer digital world?

It’s time for a serious national conversation on Big Tech, censorship, and child protection. This isn't about silencing voices—it's about saving lives.

🔔 Subscribe for more uncensored truths and policy breakdowns.

#Section230 #BigTechAccountability #ChildSafetyOnline #CSAM #ProtectKids #FreeSpeechVsSafety #EndExploitation #TechReform #CommunicationsDecencyAct #OnlineSafety #ScottBennett #PolicyDebate #DigitalRights