Epstein Not Only A Spy But Designed to Keep Revolutionary Science Under Control Of Framework Group

Eric Weinstein is onto something HUGE. When I looked into the UAP issue, patents have been typically shunted and Weinstein and others are advancing the idea that Epstein was there to suppress scientific advancement, specifically gravity.

Eric Weinstein says he’d “bet money” Epstein was an intelligence asset—and that his reach even extended to controlling scientists and burying discoveries.

According to Weinstein, Epstein and his girlfriend's father were part of a “control mechanism” designed to keep revolutionary discoveries “within a framework.”

In plain English, that likely means discoveries didn’t see the light of day unless whoever was controlling Epstein approved it.

“I was in the Harvard Mathematics Department. Jeffrey Epstein was absolutely connected to the Harvard Math Department. I want to know why. How was he connected to the Math Department?”

“Jeffrey Epstein knew a tremendous amount about my work when nobody knew anything about my work.”

“It was very important to get Nobel laureates and some of the smartest people on Earth to come to the Virgin Islands and talk about gravity. Stephen Hawking was there, David Gross was there. Lawrence Krauss was there. Lisa Randall was there right before his conviction.”

“I think that his girlfriend’s father, Robert Maxwell, was all through scientific publishing. And I think Pergamon Press was in part a control mechanism for making sure that revolutionary discoveries were taking place within a framework.”

“I think Jeffrey Epstein was in part trying to fund science, trying to control it. I don’t really know.”

This 7-minute clip says a lot.

------------------------

Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​

"Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.